Online Joint Stiffness Transfer from Human Arm to Anthropomorphic Arm

The understanding of human arm stiffness have brought several significant advances to robotics. For the most part, the end-point stiffness of human arm serves as an important role in guiding and shaping the Cartesian stiffness of robot arm in the execution of complicated interaction tasks because of the convenience of using the common space where both stiffnesses function. However, investigation of the joint stiffness of human arm, on the other hand, will provide a more comprehensive perspective on the human arm stiffness and enable other appealing robotic applications, for instance, whole-arm interaction with unstructured environment. As a fundamental research for these applications, the feasibility of an online joint stiffness transfer approach from human to anthropomorphic arms is discussed in this paper. This is realized by a proposed concept of physiological joint stiffness, which is shared by the human and anthropomorphic arms. The desired joint stiffness of robot arm is transformed from the estimated joint stiffness of human arm by requiring both arms to have the same apparent physiological joint stiffness. To make the calculated joint stiffness achievable in a robot controller, the stiffness matrix is subsequently optimized to be symmetric and positive definite. Proof-of-concept experiment is performed on a fully integrated robotic teleoperation setup to validate the efficacy of the proposed method.

[1]  V. M. Zat︠s︡iorskiĭ Kinetics of human motion , 2002 .

[2]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Cheng Fang,et al.  A unified language for anthropomorphic arm motion , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[4]  Aude Billard,et al.  End-Point Impedance Measurements Across Dominant and Nondominant Hands and Robotic Assistance with Directional Damping , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[5]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  The New Robotics—towards Human-centered Machines , 2007 .

[6]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  Neural Data-Driven Musculoskeletal Modeling for Personalized Neurorehabilitation Technologies , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  On the Value of Estimating Human Arm Stiffness during Virtual Teleoperation with Robotic Manipulators , 2017, Front. Neurosci..

[8]  Kazuhiro Kosuge,et al.  Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration , 2017, Autonomous Robots.

[9]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  XBotCore: A Real-Time Cross-Robot Software Platform , 2017, 2017 First IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC).

[10]  F. Gantmacher,et al.  Applications of the theory of matrices , 1960 .

[11]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Human-Like Adaptation of Force and Impedance in Stable and Unstable Interactions , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Christian Ott,et al.  Cartesian Impedance Control of Redundant and Flexible-Joint Robots , 2008, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[13]  Ubbo Visser Human-Centered Robotics , 2013, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[14]  Xilun Ding,et al.  A Novel Method of Motion Planning for an Anthropomorphic Arm Based on Movement Primitives , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[15]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Reduced-complexity representation of the human arm active endpoint stiffness for supervisory control of remote manipulation , 2018, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[16]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Online Model Based Estimation of Complete Joint Stiffness of Human Arm , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[17]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Towards a Robot Hardware Abstraction Layer (R-Hal) Leveraging the XBot Software Framework , 2018, 2018 Second IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC).

[18]  Imin Kao,et al.  Conservative Congruence Transformation for Joint and Cartesian Stiffness Matrices of Robotic Hands and Fingers , 2000, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[19]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..