Cortical Magnification Theory Fails to Predict Visual Recognition

The sense of form is poor in indirect view. Yet the cortical magnification theory asserts that the disadvantage can be made up by scaling the image size according to the spatial variation in the mapping of the retina onto the cortex. It is thus assumed that all visual information passes through a functionally homogeneous neural circuitry, with the spatial sampling of input signals varying across the visual field. We challenge this notion by showing that character recognition in the visual field cannot be accommodated by any concept of sole size scaling but requires increasing both size and contrast of the target being viewed. This finding is formalized into a hyperbolic law which states that target size multiplied by log contrast is constant across the visual field. We conclude that the scalar cortical magnification theory fails for character recognition since the latter depends on multidimensional pattern representations in higher, i.e. striate and prestriate, cortical areas.

[1]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: Asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability , 1984, Vision Research.

[2]  N. Drasdo.  The neural representation of visual space , 1977, Nature.

[3]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[4]  A. Cowey,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells that project to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in the macaque monkey , 1984, Neuroscience.

[5]  Orientation Sensitivity in the Peripheral Visual Field , 1984, Perception.

[6]  Eric L. Schwartz,et al.  Computational anatomy and functional architecture of striate cortex: A spatial mapping approach to perceptual coding , 1980, Vision Research.

[7]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Deviations from strict M scaling , 1992 .

[8]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. III. The target extent as a sensitivity controlling parameter. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[9]  D. Robinson.  Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. , 1972, Vision research.

[10]  Ingo Rentschler,et al.  Numerosity judgments in peripheral vision: Limitations of the cortical magnification hypothesis , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Temporal contrast sensitivity and cortical magnification , 1982, Vision Research.

[12]  F. W. Weymouth.  Visual sensory units and the minimal angle of resolution. , 1958, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Trichur Raman Vidyasagar,et al.  The responses of cells in macaque lateral geniculate nucleus to sinusoidal gratings. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Effects of practice and the separation of test targets on foveal and peripheral stereoacuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[15]  C. Zetzsche,et al.  Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two-dimensional signals , 1990, Vision Research.

[16]  MARGARET S. LIVINGSTONE,et al.  Spatial relationship and extrafoveal vision , 1985, Nature.

[17]  Satosi Watanabe,et al.  Pattern Recognition: Human and Mechanical , 1985 .

[18]  B. Boycott,et al.  Cortical magnification factor and the ganglion cell density of the primate retina , 1989, Nature.

[19]  Lewis O. Harvey,et al.  Efficient estimation of sensory thresholds , 1986 .

[20]  G. Westheimer.  The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[21]  J S Pointer,et al.  THE CORTICAL MAGNIFICATION FACTOR AND PHOTOPIC VISION , 1986, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[22]  D. Whitteridge,et al.  The representation of the visual field on the cerebral cortex in monkeys , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  R Näsänen,et al.  Cortical magnification and peripheral vision. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[24]  CONTRAST SENSITIVITY OF THE HUMAN RETINA* , 1972, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[25]  G. D. Schweinitz.  SOME OF THE PHASES AND CONTRIBUTIONS OF AMERICAN OPHTHALMOLOGY , 1930 .

[26]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  D. H. Kelly,et al.  Retinal inhomogeneity. I. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  N. Drasdo,et al.  Receptive field densities of the ganglion cells of the human retina , 1989, Vision Research.

[29]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Neural mapping and space-variant image processing , 1990, 1990 IJCNN International Joint Conference on Neural Networks.

[30]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Chapter 7 New views of primate retinal function , 1990 .

[31]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. IV. The influence of the mean retinal illuminance. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[32]  A. Cowey,et al.  The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: Implications for central magnification factors , 1985, Vision Research.

[33]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Model of peripheral and amblyopic hyperacuity , 1991, Vision Research.

[34]  Minami Ito,et al.  Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 1992, Nature.

[35]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[36]  Elek Ludvigh,et al.  Extrafoveal Visual Acuity as Measured with Snellen Test-Letters , 1941 .

[37]  J Saarinen,et al.  Perception of Positional Relationships between Line Segments in Eccentric Vision , 1987, Perception.

[38]  R Hilz,et al.  Functional organization of the peripheral retina: sensitivity to periodic stimuli. , 1974, Vision research.

[39]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Sensitivity to phase distortions in central and peripheral vision , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[40]  M. Banks,et al.  Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision , 1987, Nature.

[41]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Contrast thresholds for identification of numeric characters in direct and eccentric view , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.

[43]  I Rentschler,et al.  Hidden-face recognition: comparing foveal and extrafoveal performance. , 1985, Human neurobiology.

[44]  L. Ling,et al.  Magnification factors and the organization of the human striate cortex. , 1988, Human neurobiology.

[45]  S. Freguia.  Researches in Binocular Vision. , 1950 .

[46]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.