Does the cerebellum play a role in podokinetic adaptation?

After sustained stepping in-place on a rotating disc, healthy subjects will inadvertently turn in circles when asked to step in-place on a stationary surface with eyes closed. We asked whether the cerebellum is important for this adaptive phenomenon, called podokinetic after-rotation (PKAR). Subjects with cerebellar degeneration and age-matched control subjects performed 15 min of stepping in-place with eyes open on a rotating disc, then 30 min of attempting to step in-place with eyes closed on a stationary surface. Rotational velocity of PKAR was measured during this 30-min period. All control subjects demonstrated PKAR; average initial rotational velocity for control subjects was 16.4±3.5 °/s. Five of the eight cerebellar subjects demonstrated impaired PK adaptation, defined as PKAR with an initial velocity more than two standard deviations below the control mean initial velocity. Average initial rotational velocity for cerebellar subjects was 7.8±0.2 °/s. Impaired PK adaptation was not associated with impaired time constants of decay and was not correlated with variability of PKAR velocity. Our results suggest that the cerebellum is important for regulation of the amplitude of PK adaptation and that reduced PKAR amplitude is not likely the result of dyscoordination or variability of movement in the subjects tested.

[1]  S. Cooper,et al.  Differential effects of deep cerebellar nuclei inactivation on reaching and adaptive control. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  D. Timmann Classically conditioned withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients , 2000 .

[3]  F B Horak,et al.  Prediction and set-dependent scaling of early postural responses in cerebellar patients. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  D. Yanagihara,et al.  Nitric oxide plays a key role in adaptive control of locomotion in cat. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Baizer,et al.  Cerebellar lesions and prism adaptation in macaque monkeys. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  A. Bastian,et al.  Cerebellar subjects show impaired adaptation of anticipatory EMG during catching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  W T Thach,et al.  The cerebellum and the adaptive coordination of movement. , 1992, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  E. W. Block,et al.  Motor learning in the “podokinetic” system and its role in spatial orientation during locomotion , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  H. Diener,et al.  Classically conditioned withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients. 1. Impaired conditioned responses , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  F. Horak,et al.  Postural responses to changing task conditions in patients with cerebellar lesions , 1998, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  H. Deubel,et al.  Cerebellar lesions impair rapid saccade amplitude adaptation , 2001, Neurology.

[14]  M. Hallett,et al.  International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[15]  J. R. Bloedel,et al.  Adaptive changes in responses to repeated locomotor perturbations in cerebellar patients , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  C. R. Gordon,et al.  Adaptive plasticity in the control of locomotor trajectory , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Theodore Raphan,et al.  Habituation and adaptation of the vestibuloocular reflex: a model of differential control by the vestibulocerebellum , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.