Sharing Data and Results in Ethnographic Research: Why This Should Not Be an Ethical Imperative

Researchers recently have argued that offering to share research results with study participants should be an “ethical imperative.” This article considers that suggestion in light of the practice of ethnographic, particularly anthropological, research. Sharing results is discussed in relation to several issues, e.g., whether it occurs during or after completion of a project, whether the research is long-term, the complexities involved in depositing field materials in archives, the changing politics of ethnographic research, research not concerned with communities, situations in which participants and the anthropologist may be in danger, and changing styles of ethnographic research. I argue that, ideally, sharing should be a regular component of ethnographic research but should not be an ethical requirement. Given the complexity, variety and changing political contexts of ethnographic research, implementing such a requirement would often be practically impossible and sometimes would be inadvisable. I recommend instead that research ethics boards educate themselves about the nature of ethnographic research. Further, they should approach decision making on the issue of data or results sharing on a case-by-case basis. For researchers, I recommend that discussion of data and result sharing should become part of the education of all ethnographers and that discussion of the issue should be fostered.

[1]  C. Geertz AN INCONSTANT PROFESSION: The Anthropological Life in Interesting Times , 2002 .

[2]  R. Lederman Introduction: Anxious borders between work and life in a time of bureaucratic ethics regulation , 2006 .

[3]  R. Handler Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. George E. Marcus , Michael M. J. Fischer , 1986 .

[4]  J. Sluka Death Squad: The Anthropology of State Terror , 2000 .

[5]  Naho Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession (OCAP) or Self-Determination Applied to Research: A Critical Analysis of Contemporary First Nations Research and Some Options for First Nations Communities , 2005 .

[6]  Jeremy Sugarman,et al.  Ethical goals of community consultation in research. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[7]  Maria E. Garcia Ethnographic responsibility and the anthropological endeavor : Beyond identity discourse , 2000 .

[8]  H. Mann Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results , 2002, The Lancet.

[9]  Martin Tolich,et al.  Internal Confidentiality: When Confidentiality Assurances Fail Relational Informants , 2004 .

[10]  Linda T. Smith ON TRICKY GROUND Researching the Native in the Age of Uncertainty , 2005 .

[11]  J. Clifford,et al.  Writing culture : the poetics and politics of ethnography : a School of American Research advanced seminar , 1986 .

[12]  Michael Burawoy,et al.  Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis , 1991 .

[13]  C. Weijer Protecting Communities in Research: Philosophical and Pragmatic Challenges , 1999, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

[14]  Martin Tolich,et al.  If Ethics Committees were Designed for Ethnography , 2006, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[15]  J. Berg,et al.  Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[16]  Michael F. Brown Can Culture Be Copyrighted?1 , 1998, Current Anthropology.

[17]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[18]  J. C. Kovats-Bernat Negotiating Dangerous Fields: Pragmatic Strategies for Fieldwork amid Violence and Terror , 2002 .

[19]  H. Bernard Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1988 .

[20]  A. Perl,et al.  Code of Ethics , 1963, Science.

[21]  R. Kirby Ethics and Regulation Of Clinical Research , 1982 .

[22]  D. Price Cold war anthropology: Collaborators and victims of the national security state , 1998 .

[23]  A. Robben,et al.  Fieldwork Under Fire: Contemporary Studies of Violence and Survival. , 1998 .

[24]  Kevin McGovern Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research , 2008 .

[25]  Philip Denenfeld,et al.  Statement on Professional Ethics , 1966 .

[26]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Protecting communities in research: current guidelines and limits of extrapolation , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[27]  C. Fluehr‐Lobban Ethics and the profession of anthropology : dialogue for ethically conscious practice , 2003 .

[28]  Marlene Brant Castellano Ethics of Aboriginal Research , 2004 .

[29]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Protecting Communities in Biomedical Research , 2000, Science.

[30]  T. H. Allegri The Code of Federal Regulations , 1986 .

[31]  M. Burgess Beyond consent: ethical and social issues in genetic testing , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  J. Waldram,et al.  Anthropology, Public Policy, and Native Peoples in Canada , 1993 .

[33]  A. Zeiderman Schizophrenia and the Slum: Notes on Touring Favelas in Rio de Janeiro , 2006 .

[34]  Kevin D. Haggerty Ethics Creep: Governing Social Science Research in the Name of Ethics , 2004 .

[35]  S. Jaarsma Handle with Care: Ownership And Control Of Ethnographic Materials , 2002 .

[36]  Robert V. Kemper,et al.  Chronicling cultures : long-term field research in anthropology , 2002 .

[37]  C. Fernandez,et al.  Informing research participants of research results: analysis of Canadian university based research ethics board policies , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[38]  D. Posey Intellectual Property Rights: And Just Compensation for Indigenous Knowledge , 1990 .

[39]  Richard R Sharp,et al.  Community involvement in the ethical review of genetic research: lessons from American Indian and Alaska Native populations. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[40]  E. Nunes Walking the tightrope: ethical issues for qualitative researchers , 2008 .

[41]  N. Stanley Being Ourselves for You: The Global Display of Cultures , 1998 .

[42]  D. Goldstein Desconfianza and Problems of Representation in Urban Ethnography , 2002 .

[43]  E. Winer,et al.  Informing clinical trial participants about study results. , 2002, JAMA.

[44]  Ivan Paolo de Paris Fontanari The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography , 2008 .

[45]  M. Brady,et al.  The ethics of reporting and disseminating results of clinical research trials , 2004, Cancer.

[46]  A. Robben,et al.  The Doing of AnthropologyReflections on Managing Danger in Fieldwork: Dangerous Anthropology in Belfast , 1996 .

[47]  Michael M. J. Fischer,et al.  [Book review] anthropology as cultural critique, an experimental moment in the human sciences , 1986 .

[48]  R. Bishop Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research: A Maori approach to creating knowledge , 1998 .

[49]  Groups, communities, and contested identities in genetic research. , 2000, The Hastings Center report.

[50]  T. Wilkinson Individualism and the Ethics of Research on Humans , 2004, HEC Forum.

[51]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[52]  B. Wilfond,et al.  Disclosing Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants , 2006, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[53]  Caroline B. Brettell When They Read What We Write: The Politics of Ethnography , 1993 .

[54]  Charles Weijer,et al.  Informing study participants of research results: an ethical imperative. , 2003, IRB.

[55]  Philippe Bourgois,et al.  In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio , 1997 .

[56]  Vine Deloria Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto , 1969 .

[57]  M. W. Foster,et al.  Involving Study Populations in the Review of Genetic Research , 2000, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[58]  C. Weijer Benefit‐sharing and other protections for communities in genetic research , 2000, Clinical genetics.

[59]  Teaching Participant‐Observation Research Methods: A Skills‐Building Approach , 1980 .

[60]  D. Price Subtle Means and Enticing Carrots , 2003 .