Interactive, multi-modality image registrations for combined MRI/MRSI-planned HDR prostate brachytherapy

Purpose This study presents the steps and criteria involved in the series of image registrations used clinically during the planning and dose delivery of focal high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of the prostate. Material and methods Three imaging modalities – Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI), and Computed Tomography (CT) – were used at different steps during the process. MRSI is used for identification of dominant intraprosatic lesions (DIL). A series of rigid and nonrigid transformations were applied to the data to correct for endorectal-coil-induced deformations and for alignment with the planning CT. Mutual information was calculated as a morphing metric. An inverse planning optimization algorithm was applied to boost dose to the DIL while providing protection to the urethra, penile bulb, rectum, and bladder. Six prostate cancer patients were treated using this protocol. Results The morphing algorithm successfully modeled the probe-induced prostatic distortion. Mutual information calculated between the morphed images and images acquired without the endorectal probe showed a significant (p = 0.0071) increase to that calculated between the unmorphed images and images acquired without the endorectal probe. Both mutual information and visual inspection serve as effective diagnostics of image morphing. The entire procedure adds less than thirty minutes to the treatment planning. Conclusion This work demonstrates the utility of image transformations and registrations to HDR brachytherapy of prostate cancer.

[1]  G. Hanks.  ASTRO 1984 Presidential Address. Optimizing the radiation treatment and outcome of prostate cancer. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  A. Ardeshir Goshtasby,et al.  Image registration by local approximation methods , 1988, Image Vis. Comput..

[3]  A. Zietman,et al.  Localized carcinoma of the prostate (Stages T1B, T1C, T2, and T3). Review of management with external beam radiation therapy , 1993, Cancer.

[4]  P. Carroll,et al.  Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.7-cm3) spatial resolution. , 1996, Radiology.

[5]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging--clinicopathologic study. , 1999, Radiology.

[8]  M. Zaider,et al.  Treatment planning for prostate implants using magnetic-resonance spectroscopy imaging. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  J. Kurhanewicz,et al.  Very selective suppression pulses for clinical MRSI studies of brain and prostate cancer , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Three-dimensional magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of brain and prostate cancer. , 2000, Neoplasia.

[11]  S. K. Kang,et al.  Acute urinary toxicity following transperineal prostate brachytherapy using a modified Quimby loading method. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J. Pauly,et al.  Dualband spectral‐spatial RF pulses for prostate MR spectroscopic imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Chris Mitchell,et al.  Dose escalation using conformal high-dose-rate brachytherapy improves outcome in unfavorable prostate cancer. , 2002, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[14]  P. Rzehak,et al.  Long-term outcome after elective irradiation of the pelvic lymphatics and local dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  G. Gustafson,et al.  Conformal high dose rate brachytherapy improves biochemical control and cause specific survival in patients with prostate cancer and poor prognostic factors. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[16]  J. Kurhanewicz,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopic Imaging of Prostate Cancer , 2001, Cancer investigation.

[17]  B. Daniel,et al.  Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study. , 2004, Medical physics.

[18]  Cedric X. Yu,et al.  Deformable image registration for the use of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in prostate treatment planning. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate depiction at endorectal MR spectroscopic imaging: investigation of a standardized evaluation system. , 2004, Radiology.

[20]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Inverse planning for HDR prostate brachytherapy used to boost dominant intraprostatic lesions defined by magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J. Battermann,et al.  Quality of life of patients after permanent prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Michael Garwood,et al.  Sequence design for magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer at 3 T , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Expandable and rigid endorectal coils for prostate MRI: Impact on prostate distortion and rigid image registration. , 2005, Medical physics.

[24]  Boyd McCurdy,et al.  A feasibility study to investigate the use of thin-plate splines to account for prostate deformation. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Ken Goldberg,et al.  Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation. , 2006, Medical physics.

[26]  Y. Yoshioka,et al.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy without external beam irradiation for locally advanced prostate cancer. , 2006, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  Esin Ozturk-Isik,et al.  High‐speed 3T MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate with flyback echo‐planar encoding , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Edward L. Chaney,et al.  Automated Finite-Element Analysis for Deformable Registration of Prostate Images , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Vladimir Pekar,et al.  Assessment of a model-based deformable image registration approach for radiation therapy planning. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  J. Pouliot,et al.  Class solution in inverse planned HDR prostate brachytherapy for dose escalation of DIL defined by combined MRI/MRSI. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  X Allen Li,et al.  Automated registration of large deformations for adaptive radiation therapy of prostate cancer. , 2008, Medical physics.

[32]  Karthik Krishnan,et al.  Interactive deformation registration of endorectal prostate MRI using ITK thin plate splines. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[33]  Anant Madabhushi,et al.  Computer-assisted targeted therapy (CATT) for prostate radiotherapy planning by fusion of CT and MRI , 2010, Medical Imaging.