Sonographic Axial Length of the Eye in Healthy Nigerians at the Jos University Teaching Hospital

Introduction: Ultrasonography of the eyeball has become very important as a diagnostic tool in ophthalmology practice, because it is a rapid, safe and atraumatic method of examination. The Axial Length (AL) is the distance from the corneal surface to the retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch’s membrane. Method: The study was a retrospective analysis of all the normal ocular ultrasound scan at the Jos University Teaching Hospital. A 10 MHz linear transducer of the LOGIC 5, GE ultrasound machine was placed over the closed eyelid and scanning was done in the transverse and vertical or cranio-caudal planes of the eye. Basic statistics were performed using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) and the analyzed data were expressed in descriptive statistics such as frequency tables, percentages, mode, median and mean. Correlative analysis, Students’ t-test, was used to test for significant differences. A statistical significance level of p-value of <0.05 was adopted. Results: The mean right axial length is 2.15±0.42 and that of the left was 2.05±0.39. The right axial length was higher than that of the left in both sexes. The right and left axial lengths were higher in females compared to males. There is significant correlation between age and the right and left axial length. Conclusion: The right axial length was higher than that of the left in both sexes. The right and left axial lengths were higher in females compared to males. The axial length was lower than the international value.

[1]  Veena Bhardwaj,et al.  Axial length, anterior chamber depth-a study in different age groups and refractive errors. , 2013, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[2]  A. Fotouhi,et al.  The distribution of axial length, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, and vitreous chamber depth in an adult population of Shahroud, Iran , 2012, BMC Ophthalmology.

[3]  Jean-Marie Parel,et al.  Human ocular biometry. , 2012, Experimental eye research.

[4]  R. Trivedi,et al.  Prediction error after pediatric cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation: Contact versus immersion A‐scan biometry , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[5]  J. Mehta,et al.  Biometry of the cornea and anterior chamber in chinese eyes: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  Tin Aung,et al.  Association between stature, ocular biometry and refraction in an adult population in rural Myanmar: the Meiktila eye study , 2007, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[7]  F. Jónasson,et al.  Relationships between ocular dimensions and adult stature among participants in the Reykjavik Eye Study. , 2005, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[8]  Mina Torres,et al.  Refractive error, ocular biometry, and lens opalescence in an adult population: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. , 2005, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  R. Ritch,et al.  Axial length and optic disc size in normal eyes , 2005, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  G. McKillop,et al.  Text book of radiology and imaging , 2003 .

[11]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  R. Trivedi,et al.  Axial length measurement techniques in pediatric eyes with cataract. , 2012, Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society.

[13]  O. Ogbeide,et al.  OCULAR VOLUME DETERMINATION IN NIGERIANS , 2008 .