Quantitative analysis of changes in ER, PR and HER2 expression in primary breast cancer and paired nodal metastases.

BACKGROUND Assessment of receptors [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] is routinely carried out on primary tumour in order to select appropriate adjuvant therapy; the same analysis is not carried out on nodal metastases. Since de novo resistance to therapy is common, we quantified differences in receptor expression between primary and nodal disease in order to assess whether this might contribute to therapeutic resistance. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 385 patients with invasive primary breast carcinomas and paired lymph nodes (n = 211) were assessed for ER, PR and HER2 expression using quantitative immunofluorescence. Cut-points were defined by comparison with tumours scored by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH. Differences in expression for each of the markers and molecular phenotype were analysed. RESULTS Quantitative receptor expression shows a wide dynamic range compared with IHC. Overall, 46.9% cases had disparate breast/node receptor status of at least one receptor. Many of the differences in expression between primary tumour and node are large magnitude (greater than fivefold) changes. Triple-negative phenotype changes in 23.1% of cases. CONCLUSIONS A significant number of patients show discordant quantitative expression of molecular markers between primary and nodal disease. Appropriately measured, lymph node receptor status could be a more accurate measurement for guiding adjuvant therapy, which requires testing in a clinical trial.

[1]  Y. Nio,et al.  Heterogeneic expression of estrogen receptor between the primary tumor and the corresponding involved lymph nodes in patients with node‐positive breast cancer and its implications in patient outcome , 2003, Journal of surgical oncology.

[2]  D. Larsimont,et al.  Comparison of HER-2 status between primary breast cancer and corresponding distant metastatic sites. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  J. Kononen,et al.  Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimens , 1998, Nature Medicine.

[4]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[5]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[6]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Predictive markers in breast cancer – the future , 2007, Histopathology.

[7]  G. Dranitsaris,et al.  Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases? , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[8]  N. Meydan,et al.  Biological characteristics of breast cancer at the primary tumour and the involved lymph nodes , 2005, International journal of clinical practice.

[9]  K. Wester,et al.  HER2 expression in breast cancer primary tumours and corresponding metastases. Original data and literature review , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  Monique Chambon,et al.  Role of estrogens and their receptors in adhesion and invasiveness of breast cancer cells. , 2008, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[11]  Y Wang,et al.  Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.

[12]  Michael T. McManus,et al.  Up-regulation of miR-21 by HER2/neu Signaling Promotes Cell Invasion* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  C. Kamby,et al.  Oestrogen receptor status of primary breast carcinomas and their metastases. Relation to pattern of spread and survival after recurrence. , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  C. Hudis,et al.  Adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: evolution of NCCN, ASCO, and St Gallen recommendations. , 2006, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[15]  C. Wells,et al.  Predictive markers in breast cancer – the present , 2007, Histopathology.

[16]  I. Goryanin,et al.  Dynamic computational modeling in the search for better breast cancer drug therapy. , 2007, Pharmacogenomics.

[17]  David J. Harrison,et al.  Systems pathology—taking molecular pathology into a new dimension , 2009, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[18]  T. Singleton,et al.  Stability of HER-2/neu expression over time and at multiple metastatic sites. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  H. Moch,et al.  Patterns of her-2/neu amplification and overexpression in primary and metastatic breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  E. Slodkowska,et al.  Comparison of Quantitative Immunofluorescence With Conventional Methods for HER2/neu Testing With Respect to Response to Trastuzumab Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2009 .

[21]  David Cameron,et al.  2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial , 2007, The Lancet.

[22]  Margaret Grant,et al.  Automated image analysis for high‐throughput quantitative detection of ER and PR expression levels in large‐scale clinical studies: The TEAM Trial Experience , 2009, Histopathology.

[23]  J. Yarnold,et al.  Local relapse rates are falling after breast conserving surgery and systemic therapy for early breast cancer: can radiotherapy ever be safely withheld? , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  J. Isola,et al.  Amplification of HER-2/neu and topoisomerase IIalpha in primary and metastatic breast cancer. , 2001, Cancer research.

[25]  D. Coradini,et al.  Distribution of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes in Individual Patients with Breast Cancer , 1984, Tumori.

[26]  C. Kamby,et al.  Immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptors in paraffin sections from primary and metastatic breast cancer. , 1989, Pathology, research and practice.

[27]  A. Karameris,et al.  Prognostic significance of VEGF expression evaluated by quantitative immunohistochemical analysis in colorectal cancer. , 2008, The Journal of surgical research.

[28]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Comparison of quantitative immunofluorescence with conventional methods for HER2/neu testing with respect to response to trastuzumab therapy in metastatic breast cancer. , 2008, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[29]  T. Kirkegaard,et al.  Observer variation in immunohistochemical analysis of protein expression, time for a change? , 2006, Histopathology.

[30]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[31]  M. Bui,et al.  Assessment of Her-2/neu overexpression in primary breast cancers and their metastatic lesions: an immunohistochemical study. , 2000, Annals of clinical and laboratory science.

[32]  S. Tsutsui,et al.  EGFR, c-erbB2 and p53 protein in the primary lesions and paired metastatic regional lymph nodes in breast cancer. , 2002, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[33]  C K Osborne,et al.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  J. Youngson,et al.  Comparison of different scoring systems for immunohistochemical staining. , 1999, Journal of clinical pathology.

[35]  Y. Monden,et al.  Comparison of estrogen receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor content of primary and involved nodes in human breast cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[36]  F. B. Sørensen,et al.  Tissue microarrays compared with whole sections and biochemical analyses. A subgroup analysis of DBCG 82 b&c. , 2008, Acta oncologica.

[37]  R. Xu,et al.  Amplification of Her-2/neu Gene in Her-2/neu-Overexpressing and -Nonexpressing Breast Carcinomas and Their Synchronous Benign, Premalignant, and Metastatic Lesions Detected by FISH in Archival Material , 2002, Modern Pathology.

[38]  R. Hähnel,et al.  The relationship between estrogen receptors in primary and secondary breast carcinomas and in sequential primary breast carcinomas , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[39]  D. Rimm,et al.  Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[40]  L. Dorssers,et al.  Expression of estrogen, progesterone and epidermal growth factor receptors in primary and metastatic breast cancer , 1995, International journal of cancer.

[41]  J. Dixon,et al.  Node retrieval in axillary lymph node dissections: recommendations for minimum numbers to be confident about node negative status , 2004, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[42]  A. Tutt,et al.  Triple negative tumours: a critical review , 2007, Histopathology.

[43]  D. Rimm,et al.  Quantitative Determination of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Cancer by Using Automated Quantitative Analysis , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[44]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[45]  G. Naumov,et al.  Molecular biology of breast cancer metastasis: Clinical implications of experimental studies on metastatic inefficiency , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[46]  O. Vinante,et al.  Correlation between genetic and biological aspects in primary non-metastatic breast cancers and corresponding synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis , 2007, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[47]  P. V. van Diest,et al.  Reproducibility of subjective immunoscoring of steroid receptors in breast cancer. , 1996, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology.

[48]  Consuelo Alvarez,et al.  Immunohistochemically determined estrogen receptor phenotype remains stable in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.