Why do shape aftereffects increase with eccentricity?

Studies have shown that spatial aftereffects increase with eccentricity. Here, we demonstrate that the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude aftereffects, which describe the perceived shifts in the shape of a sinusoidal-shaped contour following adaptation to a slightly different sinusoidal-shaped contour, also increase with eccentricity. Why does this happen? We first demonstrate that the perceptual shift increases with eccentricity for stimuli of fixed sizes. These shifts are not attenuated by variations in stimulus size; in fact, at each eccentricity the degree of perceptual shift is scale-independent. This scale independence is specific to the aftereffect because basic discrimination thresholds (in the absence of adaptation) decrease as size increases. Structural aspects of the displays were found to have a modest effect on the degree of perceptual shift; the degree of adaptation depends modestly on distance between stimuli during adaptation and post-adaptation testing. There were similar temporal rates of decline of adaptation across the visual field and higher post-adaptation discrimination thresholds in the periphery than in the center. The observed results are consistent with greater sensitivity reduction in adapted mechanisms following adaptation in the periphery or an eccentricity-dependent increase in the bandwidth of the shape-frequency- and shape-amplitude-selective mechanisms.

[1]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: Effects of spatial scale and retinal eccentricity , 1994, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  A. Johnston,et al.  Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect , 1985, Vision Research.

[4]  H. Wilson,et al.  Discrimination of contour curvature: data and theory. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through the shape-frequency after-effect , 2006, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Johnston,et al.  Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus , 1983, Vision Research.

[7]  J Rovamo,et al.  Analysis of spatial structure in eccentric vision. , 1989, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[8]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Eccentricity dependence of contrast matching and oblique masking , 1985, Vision Research.

[9]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Size and shape after-effects: Same or different mechanism? , 2010, Vision Research.

[10]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Multiplication in curvature processing. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[11]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[12]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  The role of separation and eccentricity in encoding position , 1990, Vision Research.

[13]  E. Peli,et al.  Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity , 2003, Vision Research.

[14]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Orientation dependency for foveal line stimuli: detection and intensity discrimination, resolution, orientation discrimination and Vernier acuity , 1998, Vision Research.

[15]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Nulling the motion aftereffect with dynamic random-dot stimuli: limitations and implications. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[16]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial-frequency adaptation and grating discrimination: predictions of a line-element model. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Thom Carney,et al.  Orientation discrimination as a function of stimulus eccentricity and size: Nasal/temporal retinal asymmetry , 1988, Vision Research.

[18]  G. Westheimer The spatial grain of the perifoveal visual field , 1982, Vision Research.

[19]  R. Hess,et al.  Regional sensitivity for shape discrimination. , 2000, Spatial vision.

[20]  David Whitaker,et al.  The influence of eccentricity on position and movement acuities as revealed by spatial scaling , 1992, Vision Research.

[21]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[22]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Disentangling the Role of Spatial Scale, Separation and Eccentricity in Weber's Law for Position , 1997, Vision Research.

[23]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial scale shifts in peripheral vernier acuity , 1994, Vision Research.

[24]  K. D. De Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. , 1991, Vision research.

[25]  M. Fahle Curvature detection in the visual field and a possible physiological correlate , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  W. Richards,et al.  Mechanisms of contour curvature discrimination. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.

[28]  David Whitaker,et al.  Spatial scaling of vernier acuity tasks , 1992, Vision Research.

[29]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[30]  Elena Gheorghiu,et al.  The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects , 2007, Vision Research.

[31]  M. J. Wright,et al.  The relationship of displacement thresholds for oscillating gratings to cortical magnification, spatiotemporal frequency and contrast , 1985, Vision Research.

[32]  S. Zucker,et al.  Endstopping and curvature , 1989, Vision Research.

[33]  R P Scobey,et al.  Human visual orientation discrimination. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  J. Cowan,et al.  Localized effects of spatial frequency adaptation. , 1982, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Regional distribution of the mechanisms that underlie spatial localization , 1990, Vision Research.

[36]  Manfred Fahle,et al.  A simple mechanism for detecting low curvatures , 1996, Vision Research.

[37]  H. Wilson,et al.  Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[38]  J J Koenderink,et al.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. IV. The influence of the mean retinal illuminance. , 1978, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[39]  D. Burr,et al.  Discrimination of spatial phase in central and peripheral vision , 1989, Vision Research.

[40]  Michael J Wright,et al.  Apparent Velocity of Motion Aftereffects in Central and Peripheral Vision , 1986, Perception.

[41]  Harris Jp,et al.  The tilt after-effect: changes with stimulus size and eccentricity. , 1985 .

[42]  David Whitaker,et al.  Modelling of orientation discrimination across the visual field , 1993, Vision Research.

[43]  D. P. Andrews Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea part II. Spatial integration , 1967 .

[44]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Contour integration in the peripheral field , 1999, Vision Research.

[45]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: human and ideal observers compared. , 1973, Vision research.

[46]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.

[47]  R. Gurnsey,et al.  Identification of 3D shape from texture and motion across the visual field. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[48]  H T Kukkonen,et al.  The effect of contrast and size scaling on face perception in foveal and extrafoveal vision. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[49]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Elena Gheorghiu,et al.  Spatial properties of curvature-encoding mechanisms revealed through the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects , 2008, Vision Research.

[51]  David Whitaker,et al.  Detection and discrimination of curvature in foveal and peripheral vision , 1993, Vision Research.

[52]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[53]  J Rovamo,et al.  Texture discrimination at different eccentricities. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[54]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[55]  S. Zucker,et al.  Endstopped neurons in the visual cortex as a substrate for calculating curvature , 1987, Nature.

[56]  R Over,et al.  Orientation illusion and masking in central and peripheral vision. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  M J Wright,et al.  Spatiotemporal properties of grating motion detection in the center and the periphery of the visual field. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[59]  R Over,et al.  Tilt aftereffects in central and peripheral vision. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.