Motion-induced compression of perceived numerosity

It has been recently proposed that space, time, and number might share a common representation in the brain. Evidence supporting this idea comes from adaptation studies demonstrating that prolonged exposure to a given stimulus feature distorts the perception of different characteristics. For example, visual motion adaptation affects both perceived position and duration of subsequent stimuli presented in the adapted location. Here, we tested whether motion adaptation also affects perceived numerosity, by testing the effect of adaptation to translating or rotating stimuli moving either at high (20 Hz) or low (5 Hz) speed. Adaptation to fast translational motion yielded a robust reduction in the apparent numerosity of the adapted stimulus (~25%) while adaptation to slow translational or circular motion (either 20 Hz or 5 Hz) yielded a weaker but still significant compression. Control experiments suggested that none of these results could be accounted for in terms of stimulus masking. Taken together, our results are consistent with the extant literature supporting the idea of a generalized magnitude system underlying the representation of numerosity, space and time via common metrics. However, as changes in perceived numerosity co-varied with both adapting motion profile and speed, our evidence also suggests complex and asymmetric interactions between different magnitude representations.

[1]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  A parieto-frontal network for visual numerical information in the monkey. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Wim Fias,et al.  Common and distinct brain regions in both parietal and frontal cortex support symbolic and nonsymbolic number processing in humans: A functional neuroimaging meta-analysis , 2017, NeuroImage.

[3]  A. Mizuno,et al.  A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..

[4]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  The spatial tuning of adaptation-based time compression. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[5]  FRANCIS GALTON,et al.  Visualised Numerals , 1880, Nature.

[6]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[7]  G. Cicchini,et al.  Multiple channels of visual time perception , 2016, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[8]  Martin Verner,et al.  Larger visual stimuli are perceived to last longer from time to time: The internal clock is not affected by nontemporal visual stimulus size. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[9]  Martin Verner,et al.  The effect of nontemporal stimulus size on perceived duration as assessed by the method of reproduction. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[10]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Spontaneous perception of numerosity in humans , 2016, Nature Communications.

[11]  David C Burr,et al.  Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[12]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[13]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Numerosity-duration interference: a Stroop experiment. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Mechanisms for perception of numerosity or texture-density are governed by crowding-like effects. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[15]  Christopher C. Berger,et al.  Auditory Motion Elicits a Visual Motion Aftereffect , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[16]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Neural mechanisms for timing visual events are spatially selective in real-world coordinates , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[18]  G. Orban,et al.  Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Numerosity processing in early visual cortex , 2017, NeuroImage.

[20]  William Curran,et al.  Direction-contingent duration compression is primarily retinotopic , 2014, Vision Research.

[21]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features , 2015, Cognition.

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Laurie M Wilcox,et al.  A reevaluation of the tolerance to vertical misalignment in stereopsis. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[24]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Neglect Impairs Explicit Processing of the Mental Number Line , 2022 .

[25]  David C. Burr,et al.  Separate Mechanisms for Perception of Numerosity and Density , 2014, Psychological science.

[26]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  David C. Burr,et al.  Adaptation-Induced Compression of Event Time Occurs Only for Translational Motion , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[28]  D. Burr,et al.  Saccades compress space, time and number , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Michele Furlan,et al.  Global Motion Processing in Human Visual Cortical Areas V2 and V3 , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  D. Burr,et al.  A shared numerical representation for action and perception , 2016, eLife.

[31]  Lucia Melloni,et al.  Motion along the mental number line reveals shared representations for numerosity and space , 2016, eLife.

[32]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern , 1999, Nature.

[33]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[34]  William Curran,et al.  The duration compression effect is mediated by adaptation of both retinotopic and spatiotopic mechanisms , 2016, Vision Research.

[35]  Joonkoo Park,et al.  Rapid and Direct Encoding of Numerosity in the Visual Stream. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  David Burr,et al.  Spatiotopic perceptual maps in humans: evidence from motion adaptation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Inci Ayhan,et al.  Changes in apparent duration follow shifts in perceptual timing. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[38]  William Curran,et al.  The many directions of time , 2011, Cognition.

[39]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Spatially Localized Distortions of Event Time , 2006, Current Biology.

[40]  Sheng He,et al.  Numerical magnitude modulates temporal comparison: An ERP study , 2009, Brain Research.

[41]  Martin Verner,et al.  Evidence for different processes involved in the effects of nontemporal stimulus size and numerical digit value on duration judgments , 2016, Journal of vision.

[42]  Guido Marco Cicchini,et al.  Number As a Primary Perceptual Attribute: A Review , 2016, Perception.

[43]  Wim Fias,et al.  Number Processing Pathways in Human Parietal Cortex , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[45]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  R. Snowden,et al.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion , 1998, Current Biology.

[47]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numbers: evidence from neglect and pseudoneglect , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Les Staves About number sense , 2018, Very Special Maths.

[49]  Michele Fornaciai,et al.  Spatiotemporal feature integration shapes approximate numerical processing. , 2017, Journal of vision.

[50]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  A. Nieder The neuronal code for number , 2016, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  Roberto Arrighi,et al.  Spatiotopic selectivity of adaptation-based compression of event duration. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[53]  David C. Burr,et al.  The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space , 2012, Vision Research.

[54]  M A Georgeson,et al.  The effect of spatial adaptation on perceived contrast. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[55]  David C. Burr,et al.  Spatial maps for time and motion , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  D. Alais,et al.  Rapid Recalibration to Audiovisual Asynchrony , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.