Scenarios for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Food Procurement for Public School Kitchens in Copenhagen

The food system is responsible for a third of global greenhouse gas emissions, with the majority originating from livestock. Reducing our meat consumption is thus an important part of achieving necessary reductions in emissions, and reaching children is especially important to facilitate long-lasting changes in dietary habits now and into the future. This study developed dietary scenarios for three public schools in Copenhagen, which were used as cases to demonstrate reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from public kitchens. The scenarios included (i) replacement of all beef with poultry, (ii) replacement of all meat and fish with legumes, and (iii) alignment of food procurement to the Danish Food Based Dietary Guidelines based on the Planetary Health Diet. The effects on emissions were calculated using three different LCA databases. The results showed reductions ranging from 32 to 64% depending on the scenario, the current meal plan at the case school, and the emission factors used. Not surprisingly, the vegetarian scenario resulted in the highest reductions and replacing beef resulted in the lowest. Adhering to the national guidelines will result in reductions in emissions of 39–48%. Significant variability in the results existed between the three databases, highlighting the importance of basic understanding of LCA for kitchens interested in estimating and reducing their carbon footprint while at the same time providing justification for applying multiple LCA databases for increasing robustness.

[1]  E. Roos,et al.  Associations between socioeconomic status, home food availability, parental role-modeling, and children’s fruit and vegetable consumption: a mediation analysis , 2023, BMC Public Health.

[2]  E. Trolle,et al.  Current Practices and Opportunities for More Sustainable Public Food Procurement: A Qualitative Study among Danish Municipalities and Regions , 2023, Foods.

[3]  M. Stampfer,et al.  Health and environmental impacts of plant-rich dietary patterns: a US prospective cohort study , 2022, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[4]  Adrian Muller,et al.  The compatibility of circularity and national dietary recommendations for animal products in five European countries: a modelling analysis on nutritional feasibility, climate impact, and land use. , 2022, The Lancet. Planetary health.

[5]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Allocation of environmental burdens in dairy systems: Expanding a biophysical approach for application to larger meat-to-milk ratios , 2022, Livestock Science.

[6]  E. Trolle,et al.  Carbon Footprint Reduction by Transitioning to a Diet Consistent with the Danish Climate-Friendly Dietary Guidelines: A Comparison of Different Carbon Footprint Databases , 2022, Foods.

[7]  F. Cappuccio,et al.  Plant-Based Dietary Patterns for Human and Planetary Health , 2022, Nutrients.

[8]  M. Eisen,et al.  Rapid global phaseout of animal agriculture has the potential to stabilize greenhouse gas levels for 30 years and offset 68 percent of CO2 emissions this century , 2022, PLOS Climate.

[9]  F. Passarini,et al.  Environmental Impact of Meals: How Big Is the Carbon Footprint in the School Canteens? , 2022, Foods.

[10]  M. Bruckner,et al.  Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend , 2022, Nature Food.

[11]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Review and expert survey of allocation methods used in life cycle assessment of milk and beef , 2021, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[12]  O. Wagner,et al.  Making School-Based GHG-Emissions Tangible by Student-Led Carbon Footprint Assessment Program , 2021, Energies.

[13]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods , 2021, Nature Food.

[14]  E. Trolle,et al.  Scenario Analysis of a Municipality’s Food Purchase to Simultaneously Improve Nutritional Quality and Lower Carbon Emission for Child-Care Centers , 2021, Sustainability.

[15]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  Uncertainties in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) emission inventory of greenhouse gases , 2021 .

[16]  F. Tubiello,et al.  Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions , 2021, Nature Food.

[17]  Joël Aubin,et al.  Allocation in the LCA of meat products: is agreement possible? , 2021 .

[18]  I. Azevedo,et al.  Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets , 2020, Science.

[19]  C. B. Henriksen,et al.  Transition from Animal-Based to Plant-Based Food Production to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture—The Case of Denmark , 2020, Sustainability.

[20]  F. Mihai,et al.  Sustainability Assessment at the 21st century , 2020 .

[21]  A. Tukker,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Food Systems , 2019, One Earth.

[22]  W. Willett,et al.  Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems , 2019, The Lancet.

[23]  W. Willett,et al.  Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits , 2018, Nature.

[24]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers , 2018, Science.

[25]  Johan Braet,et al.  Strategies for optimizing the environmental profile of dwellings in a Belgian context: A consequential versus an attributional approach , 2018 .

[26]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Hybrid life cycle inventory methods – A review , 2018 .

[27]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Consumers' climate-impact estimations of different food products , 2018 .

[28]  A Bernstad Saraiva,et al.  Comparative lifecycle assessment of alternatives for waste management in Rio de Janeiro - Investigating the influence of an attributional or consequential approach. , 2017, Waste management.

[29]  S. Issanchou Determining Factors and Critical Periods in the Formation of Eating Habits: Results from the Habeat Project , 2017, Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.

[30]  P. Scarborough,et al.  Analysis and valuation of the health and climate change cobenefits of dietary change , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Stephen Wiedemann,et al.  Application of life cycle assessment to sheep production systems: investigating co-production of wool and meat using case studies from major global producers , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[32]  V. Rasmussen,et al.  The Role Of School Food Service In Promoting Healthy Eating At School – A Perspective From An Ad Hoc Group On Nutrition In Schools , 2005 .

[33]  Karli Verghese,et al.  Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories , 2017 .