Novel aspects of structure-activity relationships in sweet taste chemoreception

Abstract Although sweetness is exhibited by diverse chemical structures, structure-activity relationships within one class have been strictly limited. Across classes the only worthwhile approach has been the search for common AH,B glucophores which seem sufficient to confer the quality of sweetness. Increased intensity of sweetness demands a degree of lipophilicity and the more imaginative of the recently proposed models of sweet taste chemoreception have attempted to relate sweetness to molecular hydrophile-lipophile balance. All of these structure-activity approaches lack predictive power because they fail to take account of the real hydrated state of sweet molecules as they approach and accede to a sweet receptor site. A modern approach to structure-activity studies rests on the assumption that receptors are normally in a state of interaction with water molecules so that quantitative relationships between molecules must be derived from their aqueous solution properties. By examining the solution properties of defined structures, the effects of chain length and molecular fragments can be individually elucidated. Correlation of solution parameters with time-intensity sensory analyses allows inferences about the real size of molecules which elicit sweetness. Such data are shown to have a predictive value for both taste quality and sweetness potency.

[1]  Determination of apparent molar volumes (AMV) and capacity factors (kw) for sweet and non-sweet sulphamates, correlation between AMV values, and Corey-Pauling-Koltun volumes and relative sweetness correlations , 1992 .

[2]  R. Moncrieff,et al.  The chemical senses , 1967 .

[3]  G. Birch,et al.  Sweet-Taste Chemoreception , 1993 .

[4]  M. Mathlouthi,et al.  Solution properties and the sweet taste of small carbohydrates , 1988 .

[5]  W. J. Spillane,et al.  Structure-activity studies on sulfamate sweeteners II: semiquantitative structure-taste relationship for sulfamate (RNHSO-3) sweeteners-the role of R. , 1981, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[6]  G. Birch Structural relationships of sugars to taste. , 1976, CRC critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[7]  J. Tinti,et al.  Why Does a Sweetener Taste Sweet?: A New Model , 1991 .

[8]  G. Birch,et al.  Apparent molar volumes of sugars and their significance in sweet taste chemoreception , 1985 .

[9]  T. Acree,et al.  Molecular Theory of Sweet Taste , 1967, Nature.

[10]  S. Kemp,et al.  Intrinsic viscosities and apparent specific volumes of amino acids and sugars. 'Effective size' and taste of sapid molecules. , 1990 .

[11]  G. Birch,et al.  Structure, sweetness and solution properties of small carbohydrate molecules , 1988 .

[12]  G. Birch,et al.  STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONS OF TASTE IN THE SUGAR SERIES: SENSORY PROPERTIES OF DEOXY SUGARS , 1974 .

[13]  F. Lajolo,et al.  Amylase inhibitors in Phaseolus vulgaris beans , 1991 .

[14]  A. Noble,et al.  Factors affecting the time-intensity parameters of sweetness , 1991 .

[15]  M. Clifford,et al.  Apparent molar volumes and tastes of molecules with more than one sapophore , 1987 .

[16]  M. Beets Structure-activity relationships in human chemoreception , 1978 .

[17]  G. Birch,et al.  Apparent molar volumes and 1H-NMR relaxation values of glucose syrups , 1992 .

[18]  G. Birch,et al.  Structural functions of taste in the sugar series , 1975 .

[19]  G. Birch,et al.  The Production and Properties of Glucose Syrups. III. Sweetness of Glucose Syrups and Related Carbohydrates , 1980 .

[20]  L. Kier A molecular theory of sweet taste. , 1972, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[21]  W. Woolcock Chemistry and industry , 1924 .

[22]  G. Birch,et al.  Use of the “SMURF” in taste analysis , 1981 .

[23]  Osborne R. Quayle,et al.  The Parachors of Organic Compounds. An Interpretation and Catalogue. , 1953 .

[24]  W. Sperber The modern HACCP system , 1991 .

[25]  G. Birch,et al.  Structural functions of taste in 5-membered ring structures , 1989 .

[26]  W. J. Spillane,et al.  Semi-quantitative and quantitative structure–taste relationships for carboand hetero-sulphamate (RNHSO3–) sweeteners , 1989 .

[27]  S. Kemp,et al.  Apparent specific volumes and tastes of amino acids , 1989 .