Tumor heterogeneity makes AML a “moving target” for detection of residual disease

Detection of minimal residual disease is recognized as an important post‐therapy risk factor in acute myeloid leukemia patients. Two most commonly used methods for residual disease monitoring are real‐time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and multiparameter flow cytometry. The results so far are very promising, whereby it is likely that minimal residual disease results will enable to guide future post‐remission treatment strategies. However, the leukemic clone may change between diagnosis and relapse due to the instability of the tumor cells. This instability may already be evident at diagnosis if different subpopulations of tumor cells coexist. Such tumor heterogeneity, which may be reflected by immunophenotypic, molecular, and/or cytogenetic changes, can have important consequences for minimal residual disease detection, since false‐negative results can be expected to be the result of losses of aberrancies used as minimal residual disease markers.

[1]  M. Slovak,et al.  Prognostic impact of acute myeloid leukemia classification. Importance of detection of recurring cytogenetic abnormalities and multilineage dysplasia on survival. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  R. Hills,et al.  Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. , 2010, Blood.

[3]  D. Cilloni,et al.  Assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) in CBFbeta/MYH11-positive acute myeloid leukemias by qualitative and quantitative RT-PCR amplification of fusion transcripts , 2002, Leukemia.

[4]  N. Bolli,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemia with mutated nucleophosmin ( NPM 1 ) : is it a distinct entity ? , 2011 .

[5]  D. Neuberg,et al.  A surrogate marker profile for PML/RARα expressing acute promyelocytic leukemia and the association of immunophenotypic markers with morphologic and molecular subtypes , 2004, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[6]  N. Villamor,et al.  Immunophenotypic findings in acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3 internal tandem duplication. , 2003, Haematologica.

[7]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Stability of leukemia‐associated aberrant immunophenotypes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia between diagnosis and relapse: Comparison with cytomorphologic, cytogenetic, and molecular genetic findings , 2004, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[8]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Analysis of FLT 3 length mutations in 1003 patients with acute myeloid leukemia : correlation to cytogenetics , FAB subtype , and prognosis in the AMLCG study and usefulness as a marker for the detection of minimal residual disease , 2002 .

[9]  D. Gold,et al.  Genomic, immunophenotypic, and NPM1/FLT3 mutational studies on 17 patients with normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia (AML) followed by aberrant karyotype AML at relapse. , 2010, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[10]  S. Langabeer,et al.  Studies of FLT3 mutations in paired presentation and relapse samples from patients with acute myeloid leukemia: implications for the role of FLT3 mutations in leukemogenesis, minimal residual disease detection, and possible therapy with FLT3 inhibitors. , 2002, Blood.

[11]  Q. Waisfisz,et al.  Stability and prognostic influence of FLT3 mutations in paired initial and relapsed AML samples , 2006, Leukemia.

[12]  Jih-Luh Tang,et al.  Characterization of CEBPA Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Most Patients with CEBPA Mutations Have Biallelic Mutations and Show a Distinct Immunophenotype of the Leukemic Cells , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[13]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Clinical impact of change of FLT3 mutation status in acute myeloid leukemia patients , 2012, Modern Pathology.

[14]  J. Esteve,et al.  Immunophenotype of acute myeloid leukemia with NPM mutations: prognostic impact of the leukemic compartment size. , 2011, Leukemia research.

[15]  G. Avvisati,et al.  Immunophenotype of adult and childhood acute promyelocytic leukaemia: correlation with morphology, type of PML gene breakpoint and clinical outcome. A cooperative Italian study on 196 cases , 1998, British journal of haematology.

[16]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Minimal residual disease levels assessed by NPM1 mutation-specific RQ-PCR provide important prognostic information in AML. , 2009, Blood.

[17]  T. Haferlach,et al.  Flow cytometric identification of acute myeloid leukemia with limited differentiation and NPM1 type A mutation: a new biologically defined entity , 2009, Leukemia.

[18]  Chieh-Yu Liu,et al.  WT1 mutation in 470 adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: stability during disease evolution and implication of its incorporation into a survival scoring system. , 2010, Blood.

[19]  D. Small,et al.  FLT3 mutations: biology and treatment. , 2006, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[20]  W Hiddemann,et al.  Flow cytometric characterization of acute myeloid leukemia. Part II. Phenotypic heterogeneity at diagnosis. , 1992, Leukemia.

[21]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Determination of relapse risk based on assessment of minimal residual disease during complete remission by multiparameter flow cytometry in unselected patients with acute myeloid leukemia. , 2004, Blood.

[22]  K. Wagner,et al.  FLT3-internal tandem duplication and age are the major prognostic factors in patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype , 2011, Haematologica.

[23]  M. Yao,et al.  Clinical implications of minimal residual disease monitoring by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in acute myeloid leukemia patients bearing nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations , 2007, Leukemia.

[24]  T. Murayama,et al.  Quantitation of minimal residual disease in t(8;21)‐positive acute myelogenous leukemia patients using real‐time quantitative RT‐PCR , 2000, American journal of hematology.

[25]  M. Lin,et al.  Cytogenetic profile of de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a study based on 1432 patients in a single institution of China , 2009, Leukemia.

[26]  K. Tobal,et al.  Monitoring of minimal residual disease by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for AML1-MTG8 transcripts in AML-M2 with t(8; 21). , 1996, Blood.

[27]  A. Venditti,et al.  Level of minimal residual disease after consolidation therapy predicts outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2000, Blood.

[28]  Axel Benner,et al.  Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  B. Weinshenker,et al.  Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal bands in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Isoelectric focusing with IgG immunoblotting compared with high-resolution agarose gel electrophoresis and cerebrospinal fluid IgG index. , 2003, American journal of clinical pathology.

[30]  J. Dongen,et al.  Clinical significance of flowcytometric minimal residual disease detection in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia patients treated according to the DCOG ANLL97/MRC AML12 protocol , 2010, Leukemia.

[31]  Y. Chao,et al.  Sensitive measurement of quantity dynamics of FLT3 internal tandem duplication at early time points provides prognostic information. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[32]  G. Schuurhuis,et al.  Accurate Detection of Residual Leukemic Stem Cells In Remission Bone Marrow Predicts Relapse In Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients , 2010 .

[33]  A. Hagemeijer,et al.  Acute Myeloid Leukemia M 4 With Bone Marrow Eosinophilia ( M 4 Eo ) and inv ( 16 ) ( p 13 q 22 ) Exhibits a Specific Immunophenotype With CD 2 Expression , 2003 .

[34]  A. Kohlmann,et al.  AML with mutated NPM1 carrying a normal or aberrant karyotype show overlapping biologic, pathologic, immunophenotypic, and prognostic features. , 2009, Blood.

[35]  A. Teigler‐Schlegel,et al.  Immunophenotypic differences between diagnosis and relapse in childhood AML: Implications for MRD monitoring , 2005, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[36]  F. Lo‐Coco,et al.  Identification of emerging FLT3 ITD‐positive clones during clinical remission and kinetics of disease relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia with mutated nucleophosmin , 2013, British journal of haematology.

[37]  A. Órfão,et al.  Early immunophenotypical evaluation of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia identifies different patient risk groups and may contribute to postinduction treatment stratification. , 2001, Blood.

[38]  N. Bolli,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemia with mutated nucleophosmin (NPM1): is it a distinct entity? , 2011, Blood.

[39]  M. Baccarani,et al.  Real-time quantitation of minimal residual disease in inv(16)-positive acute myeloid leukemia may indicate risk for clinical relapse and may identify patients in a curable state. , 2002, Blood.

[40]  Marcos González,et al.  Immunophenotyping investigation of minimal residual disease is a useful approach for predicting relapse in acute myeloid leukemia patients , 1997 .

[41]  D. Olive,et al.  Human acute myeloid leukemia CD34+/CD38- progenitor cells have decreased sensitivity to chemotherapy and Fas-induced apoptosis, reduced immunogenicity, and impaired dendritic cell transformation capacities. , 2000, Cancer research.

[42]  J. S. San Miguel,et al.  Minimal residual disease monitoring after allogeneic transplantation may help to individualize post‐transplant therapeutic strategies in acute myeloid malignancies , 2009, American journal of hematology.

[43]  A. Hagemeijer,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemia M4 with bone marrow eosinophilia (M4Eo) and inv(16)(p13q22) exhibits a specific immunophenotype with CD2 expression. , 1993, Blood.

[44]  F. Lo‐Coco,et al.  Prospective minimal residual disease monitoring to predict relapse of acute promyelocytic leukemia and to direct pre-emptive arsenic trioxide therapy. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  B. Bhushan,et al.  Mutation of FLT3 gene in acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics and its association with clinical and immunophenotypic features , 2011, Medical oncology.

[46]  C. Dunphy Comprehensive review of adult acute myelogenous leukemia: Cytomorphological, enzyme cytochemical, flow cytometric immunophenotypic, and cytogenetic findings , 1999, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[47]  M. Hur,et al.  Immunophenotypic and cytogenetic changes in acute leukaemia at relapse. , 2001, Clinical and laboratory haematology.

[48]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Immunophenotypic features of acute myeloid leukemia with inv(3)(q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2). , 2010, Leukemia research.

[49]  T. Naoe,et al.  Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of NPM 1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia , 2005 .

[50]  Paola Fazi,et al.  Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  H. Johnsen,et al.  Cancer stem cell definitions and terminology: the devil is in the details , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[52]  E. Thiel,et al.  Cytogenetic studies in acute leukemia patients relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. , 2010, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[53]  O. Haas,et al.  Monitoring of minimal residual disease in patients with MLL–AF6‐positive acute myeloid leukaemia by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction , 2000, British journal of haematology.

[54]  Ø. Bruserud,et al.  The surface molecule signature of primary human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells is highly associated with NPM1 mutation status , 2012, Leukemia.

[55]  I. Bernstein,et al.  Prediction of relapse of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia by use of multidimensional flow cytometry. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[56]  J. Hernández-Rivas,et al.  The flow cytometric pattern of CD34, CD15 and CD13 expression in acute myeloblastic leukemia is highly characteristic of the presence of PML-RARalpha gene rearrangements. , 1999, Haematologica.

[57]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Karyotype instability between diagnosis and relapse in 117 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: implications for resistance against therapy , 2002, Leukemia.

[58]  V. V. D. van der Velden,et al.  Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of minimal residual disease by standardized WT1 assay to enhance risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[59]  R. Pieters,et al.  Clinical relevance of Wilms tumor 1 gene mutations in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. , 2009, Blood.

[60]  D. Horsman,et al.  Correlation between karyotype and quantitative immunophenotype in acute myelogenous leukemia with t(8;21) , 2004, Modern Pathology.

[61]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Flow cytometric characterization of acute myeloid leukemia: IV. Comparison to the differentiation pathway of normal hematopoietic progenitor cells. , 1992, Leukemia.

[62]  Ping Liu,et al.  Detection of fusion transcripts generated by the inversion 16 chromosome in acute myelogenous leukemia. , 1994, Blood.

[63]  Augustin Ferrant,et al.  Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom? , 2007, Blood.

[64]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  Expression of the neural cell adhesion molecule CD56 is associated with short remission duration and survival in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22). , 1997, Blood.

[65]  C. Nerlov C/EBPα mutations in acute myeloid leukaemias , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[66]  James R. Downing,et al.  Genomic Analysis of the Clonal Origins of Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia , 2008, Science.

[67]  M. Slovak,et al.  Prognostic Impact of Acute Myeloid Leukemia Classification , 2003 .

[68]  R. Foà,et al.  High CD33 expression levels in acute myeloid leukemia cells carrying the nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutation , 2011, Haematologica.

[69]  A. Órfão,et al.  Phenotypic changes in acute myeloid leukaemia: implications in the detection of minimal residual disease. , 1996, Journal of clinical pathology.

[70]  G. Schuurhuis,et al.  Review of the relevance of aberrant antigen expression by flow cytometry in myeloid neoplasms , 2011, British journal of haematology.

[71]  Todd A Alonzo,et al.  Residual disease detected by multidimensional flow cytometry signifies high relapse risk in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a report from Children's Oncology Group. , 2012, Blood.

[72]  K. Chang,et al.  Aberrant expression of CD7 in myeloblasts is highly associated with de novo acute myeloid leukemias with FLT3/ITD mutation. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[73]  P. Bolufer,et al.  Minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia by mutant nucleophosmin (NPM1): comparison with WT1 gene expression. , 2008, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[74]  E. Paietta,et al.  Expression of cell-surface antigens in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. , 2003, Best practice & research. Clinical haematology.

[75]  Y. Assaraf,et al.  High-frequency type I/II mutational shifts between diagnosis and relapse are associated with outcome in pediatric AML: implications for personalized medicine. , 2010, Blood.

[76]  F. Lo Coco,et al.  Toward optimization of postremission therapy for residual disease-positive patients with acute myeloid leukemia. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[77]  J. Bennett,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemia M4 with inv(16) (p13q22) exhibits a specific immunophenotype with CD2 expression. , 1993, Blood.

[78]  U. Steidl,et al.  Concise Review: Preleukemic Stem Cells: Molecular Biology and Clinical Implications of the Precursors to Leukemia Stem Cells , 2013, Stem cells translational medicine.

[79]  K. Kreuzer,et al.  Patient‐specific analysis of FLT3 internal tandem duplications for the prognostication and monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia , 2012, European journal of haematology.

[80]  D. Horsman,et al.  Acute Myelogenous Leukemia with t(8;21)—Identification of a Specific Immunophenotype , 2003, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[81]  C. Nerlov C/EBPalpha mutations in acute myeloid leukaemias. , 2004, Nature reviews. Cancer.

[82]  J. Yunis,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemia M4 with inv(16) (p13q22) exhibits a specific immunophenotype with CD2 expression [letter] , 1993 .

[83]  G. Schuurhuis,et al.  MRD parameters using immunophenotypic detection methods are highly reliable in predicting survival in acute myeloid leukaemia , 2004, Leukemia.

[84]  E. Estey,et al.  Expression of unusual immunophenotype combinations in acute myelogenous leukemia. , 1993, Blood.

[85]  Y. Assaraf,et al.  The role of minor subpopulations within the leukemic blast compartment of AML patients at initial diagnosis in the development of relapse , 2012, Leukemia.

[86]  F. Ravandi,et al.  Acute promyelocytic leukemia at time of relapse commonly demonstrates cytogenetic evidence of clonal evolution and variability in blast immunophenotypic features. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[87]  I. Lewis,et al.  The use of receiver operating characteristic analysis for detection of minimal residual disease using five‐color multiparameter flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia identifies patients with high risk of relapse , 2009, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[88]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia revealed by whole genome sequencing , 2011, Nature.

[89]  W. Hiddemann,et al.  Monitoring minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukaemia with NPM1 mutations by quantitative PCR: clonal evolution is a limiting factor , 2009, British journal of haematology.

[90]  M. Ames,et al.  Selected pharmacologic characteristics of idarubicin and idarubicinol. , 1992, Leukemia.

[91]  L. Terstappen,et al.  Myeloid cell differentiation in normal bone marrow and acute myeloid leukemia assessed by multi-dimensional flow cytometry. , 1990, Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology.

[92]  T. Naoe,et al.  Clinical characteristics and prognostic implications of NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. , 2005, Blood.

[93]  Shiang Huang,et al.  A correlation study of immunophenotypic, cytogenetic, and clinical features of 180 AML patients in China , 2008, Cytometry. Part B, Clinical cytometry.

[94]  Wei Liu,et al.  Comprehensive flow cytometry phenotype in acute leukemia at diagnosis and at relapse , 2010, Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica (APMIS).

[95]  C. Bloomfield,et al.  High frequency of immunophenotype changes in acute myeloid leukemia at relapse: implications for residual disease detection (Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study 8361). , 2001, Blood.

[96]  D. Signorelli CD117 Expression Is a Sensitive but Nonspecific Predictor of FLT3 Mutation in T Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and T/Myeloid Acute Leukemia , 2013 .

[97]  L. Medeiros,et al.  CD117 expression is a sensitive but nonspecific predictor of FLT3 mutation in T acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T/myeloid acute leukemia. , 2012, American journal of clinical pathology.

[98]  M. Møller,et al.  NPM1 mutation is a stable marker for minimal residual disease monitoring in acute myeloid leukaemia patients with increased sensitivity compared to WT1 expression * , 2011, European journal of haematology.

[99]  D. Dvořáková,et al.  Monitoring of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia with frequent and rare patient‐specific NPM1 mutations , 2010, American journal of hematology.

[100]  A. Ganser,et al.  Prognostic value of minimal residual disease quantification by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in patients with core binding factor leukemias. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[101]  Martin Dugas,et al.  Analysis of FLT3 length mutations in 1003 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: correlation to cytogenetics, FAB subtype, and prognosis in the AMLCG study and usefulness as a marker for the detection of minimal residual disease. , 2002 .