Development and assessment of efficient models for barge impact processes based on nonlinear dynamic finite element analyses

Abstract The impact of vessels straying out of control poses a serious hazard for bridge piers located in navigation waterways. In order to accurately predict the dynamic responses of the bridge piers subjected to barge impact and to design bridge piers which can resist such impact, the impact forces need to be accurately defined. Empirical formulas such as those provided by AASHTO Guide Specification are currently extensively used for predicting the equivalent static impact forces. Whilst such equivalent static methods cannot accurately reflect the actual dynamic phenomena in a barge impact event, sophisticated finite-element (FE) simulations are computationally expensive. This paper aims to establish a coupled model which can replicate the complex full barge impact model (FBIM) with sufficient accuracy. In this coupled model, the barge model is simplified into a mass-spring model (MSM) whilst the pier is modeled using discrete masses and discrete beam elements. The parameters introduced by MSM are determined using the proposed strategies in this paper. Linear elastic pier columns with fixed bases and cantilevered tops are employed to assess the prediction quality of the proposed coupled model for different impact scenarios.

[1]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Response-Spectrum Analysis for Barge Impacts on Bridge Structures , 2015 .

[2]  J. Dormand,et al.  A family of embedded Runge-Kutta formulae , 1980 .

[3]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of barge crush behavior and its relationship to impact resistant bridge design , 2003 .

[4]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Probability of Collapse Expression for Bridges Subject to Barge Collision , 2013 .

[5]  Zhi Yang,et al.  Dynamic Demand of Bridge Structure Subjected to Vessel Impact Using Simplified Interaction Model , 2011 .

[6]  Peng Yuan,et al.  One‐Dimensional Model for Multi‐Barge Flotillas Impacting Bridge Piers , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[7]  David J. Benson,et al.  Strain-rate effects in rheological models of inelastic response , 2003 .

[8]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Equivalent Static Analysis Method for Barge Impact-Resistant Bridge Design , 2011 .

[9]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Barge Bow Force–Deformation Relationships for Barge–Bridge Collision Analysis , 2009 .

[10]  Hong Hao,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Barge Collision with a Single Bridge Pier , 2012 .

[11]  Hong Hao,et al.  A Simplified Approach for Predicting Bridge Pier Responses Subjected to Barge Impact Loading , 2014 .

[12]  Mi Zhou,et al.  A nonlinear dynamic macro-element for demand assessment of bridge substructures subjected to ship collision , 2011 .

[13]  Wancheng Yuan,et al.  Numerical simulation and analytical modeling of pile-supported structures subjected to ship collisions including soil–structure interaction , 2014 .

[14]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Simplified Dynamic Analysis of Barge Collision for Bridge Design , 2008 .

[15]  Zdeněk Sobotka,et al.  Rheology of materials and engineering structures , 1984 .

[16]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[17]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[18]  Gary R. Consolazio,et al.  Numerically Efficient Dynamic Analysis of Barge Collisions with Bridge Piers , 2005 .

[19]  Federico Pinto,et al.  Determination of Impact Force History during Multicolumn Barge Flotilla Collisions against Bridge Piers , 2014 .