Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture

While some research on entrepreneurship in family businesses has focused on transgenerational value creation, a gap exists in understanding how such value is generated across generations. The present research offers insights through the lens of dynamic capabilities, which are created by knowledge and in turn generate entrepreneurial performance and value creation. A model is built based on literature and case research. The crucial role of the organizational culture emerges through the empirical study. Family inertia is considered to be a factor preventing the creation of dynamic capabilities. We find that family inertia depends on characteristics of the family business culture, where paternalism and entrepreneurial orientation influence family inertia positively and negatively, respectively. Family firms from Switzerland and Italy active in the beverage industry represent the empirical context. Theoretical and practical implications are offered.

[1]  Carlo Salvato,et al.  Knowledge Integration and Dynamic Organizational Adaptation in Family Firms , 2008 .

[2]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  How dynamic can organizational capabilities be? Towards a dual-process model of capability dynamization , 2007 .

[3]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Family vs. Non–Family Firms: A Resource–Based Analysis of the Effect of Organizational Culture , 2004 .

[4]  L. Prusak.  The knowledge advantage , 1996 .

[5]  Johan Wiklund,et al.  Levels of Analysis in Entrepreneurship Research: Current Research Practice and Suggestions for the Future * , 2001 .

[6]  John A. Davis,et al.  Bivalent Attributes of the Family Firm , 1996 .

[7]  T. Habbershon,et al.  A Resource-Based Framework for Assessing the Strategic Advantages of Family Firms , 1999 .

[8]  T. Habbershon,et al.  Enterprising Families Domain: Family-Influenced Ownership Groups in Pursuit of Transgenerational Wealth , 2002 .

[9]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[10]  Pramodita Sharma,et al.  Book Reviews: Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses , 2005 .

[11]  R. Frank,et al.  Leadership for growth , 1996 .

[12]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[13]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[14]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  The role of founder in creating organizational culture , 2007 .

[15]  K. Eddleston,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurship in Family Firms: A Family Perspective , 2006 .

[16]  M. Alvesson.  Cultural perspectives on organizations , 1995 .

[17]  Desiderio J. García-Almeida,et al.  The Succession Process from a Resource- and Knowledge-Based View of the Family Firm , 2001 .

[18]  Per-Olof Bjuggren,et al.  Strategic Decision Making in Intergenerational Successions of Small- and Medium-Size Family-Owned Businesses , 2001 .

[19]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[20]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[21]  W. Dyer,et al.  Cultural Change in Family Firms: Anticipating and Managing Business and Family Transitions , 1986 .

[22]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[23]  Teppo Felin,et al.  Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations, Networks and Systems Strategic Organization: a Field in Search of Micro- Foundations Strategic Organization: a Field in Search of Micro-foundations , 2022 .

[24]  John A. Davis,et al.  Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business , 1997 .

[25]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms , 2003 .

[26]  F. Chirico.  Knowledge Accumulation in Family Firms , 2008 .

[27]  D. Leonard-Barton.  CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[28]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[29]  K. Eddleston,et al.  Resource Configuration in Family Firms: Linking Resources, Strategic Planning and Technological Opportunities to Performance , 2007 .

[30]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[31]  Leif Melin,et al.  Entrepreneurship as Radical Change in the Family Business: Exploring the Role of Cultural Patterns , 2001 .

[32]  E. Schein.  The Role of the Founder in Creating Organizational Culture , 1983 .

[33]  Leif Melin,et al.  Creating Value Across Generations in Family-Controlled Businesses: The Role of Family Social Capital , 2008 .

[34]  Donald O. Neubaum,et al.  Knowledge sharing and technological capabilities: The moderating role of family involvement , 2007 .

[35]  Paula D. Harveston,et al.  In the Founder's Shadow: Conflict in the Family Firm , 1999 .

[36]  David J. Miller,et al.  The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms , 1983 .

[37]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[38]  F. Chirico,et al.  A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms , 2010 .

[39]  I. Nonaka,et al.  A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm , 2000 .

[40]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[41]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Representing change: a system model of organizational inertia and capabilities as dynamic accumulation processes , 2002, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[42]  Carole Howorth,et al.  ‘Types’ of private family firms: an exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis , 2007 .

[43]  R. Suddaby.  From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not , 2006 .

[44]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[45]  Johan Wiklund,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation, Risk Taking, and Performance in Family Firms , 2007 .

[46]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research , 2000, QMiP Bulletin.