Hierarchical benchmark case study for history matching, uncertainty quantification and reservoir characterisation

Benchmark problems have been generated to test a number of issues related to predicting reservoir behaviour (e.g. Floris et al., 2001, Christie and Blunt, 2001, Peters et al., 2010). However, such cases are usually focused on a particular aspect of the reservoir model (e.g. upscaling, property distribution, history matching, uncertainty prediction, etc.) and the other decisions in constructing the model are fixed by log values that are related to the distribution of cell properties away from the wells, fixed grids and structural features and fixed fluid properties. This is because all these features require an element of interpretation, from indirect measurements of the reservoir, noisy and incomplete data and judgments based on domain knowledge. Therefore, there is a need for a case study that would consider interpretational uncertainty integrated throughout the reservoir modelling workflow. In this benchmark study we require the modeller to make interpretational choices as well as to select the techniques applied to the case study, namely the geomodelling approach, history matching algorithm and/or uncertainty quantification technique. The interpretational choices will be around the following areas: (1)Top structure interpretation from seismic and well picks. (2)Fault location, dimensions and the connectivity of the network uncertainty. (3)Facies modelling approach. (4)Facies interpretations from well logs cutoffs. (5)Petrophysical property prediction from the available well data. (6)Grid resolution-choice between number of iterations and model resolution to capture the reservoir features adequately. A semi-synthetic study is based on real field data provided: production data, seismic sections to interpret the faults and top structures, wireline logs to identify facies correlations and saturation profile and porosity and permeability data and a host of other data. To make this problem useable in a manageable time period multiple hierarchically related gridded models were produced for a range of different interpretational choices.

[1]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Error analysis and simulations of complex phenomena , 2005 .

[2]  M. Sambridge.  Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm—I. Searching a parameter space , 1999 .

[3]  Peter Molnar,et al.  John Perry's neglected critique of Kelvin's age for the Earth: A missed opportunity in geodynamics , 2007 .

[4]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Use of solution error models in history matching , 2008 .

[5]  Z. Shipton,et al.  What do you think this is? "Conceptual uncertainty" in geoscience interpretation , 2007 .

[6]  Ning Liu,et al.  Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching , 2008 .

[7]  Robin Tokmakian,et al.  Modelling Future Climates , 2011 .

[8]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Model complexity in reservoir simulation , 2008 .

[9]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Bayesian inverse problem and optimization with iterative spatial resampling , 2010 .

[10]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Population MCMC methods for history matching and uncertainty quantification , 2010, Computational Geosciences.

[11]  Jef Caers,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification in Reservoir Performance Using Distances and Kernel Methods--Application to a West Africa Deepwater Turbidite Reservoir , 2009 .

[12]  Jef Caers,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences , 2011 .

[13]  A. R. Syversveen,et al.  Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: a comparative study , 2001, Petroleum Geoscience.

[14]  Chul-Sung Kim.  New Uncertainty Measures for Predicted Geologic Properties from Seismic Attribute Calibration , 2002 .

[15]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  How Does Sampling Strategy Affect Uncertainty Estimations , 2007 .

[16]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[17]  Hilde Meisingset,et al.  Using the EnKF for Assisted History Matching of a North Sea Reservoir Model , 2007 .

[18]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Population MCMC Methods for History Matching and Uncertainty Quantification , 2010 .

[19]  Ning Liu,et al.  Assessment of Uncertainty Assessment Methods , 2001 .

[20]  M. Sambridge.  Geophysical inversion with a neighbourhood algorithm—II. Appraising the ensemble , 1999 .

[21]  J. Caers,et al.  Dynamic data integration for structural modeling: model screening approach using a distance-based model parameterization , 2008 .

[22]  Lotfi A. Zadeh.  Toward a perception-based theory of probabilistic reasoning with imprecise probabilities , 2003 .

[23]  Alexander Y. Sun,et al.  Identification of Geologic Fault Network Geometry by Using a Grid-Based Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2011 .

[24]  J. Caers,et al.  Uncertainty Quantification Using Distances and Kernel Methods – Application to a Deepwater Turbidite Reservoir , 2008 .

[25]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Use of Geological Prior Information in Reservoir Facies Modelling , 2011 .

[26]  Yasin Hajizadeh,et al.  Comparative Study of Novel Population-Based Optimization Algorithms for History Matching and Uncertainty Quantification: PUNQ-S3 Revisited , 2010 .

[27]  E. Rankey.  Interpreter's Corner—That's why it's called interpretation: Impact of horizon uncertainty on seismic attribute analysis , 2003 .

[28]  Geir Evensen,et al.  An Elastic Grid Approach for Fault Uncertainty Modelling and Updating Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2010 .

[29]  Peter P. Valko,et al.  Performance of a Longitudinally Fractured Horizontal Well , 1996 .

[30]  A. O’Sullivan,et al.  Error models for reducing history match bias , 2006 .

[31]  A. Curtis,et al.  Geological prior information and its applications to geoscientific problems , 2004, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[32]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Effect of Sampling Strategies on Prediction Uncertainty Estimation , 2007 .

[33]  D. Arnold,et al.  Geological parameterisation of petroleum reservoir models for improved uncertainty quantification , 2008 .

[34]  M. Turmon,et al.  Improved Uncertainty Quantification in Groundwater Flux Estimation Using GRACE , 2015 .

[35]  M. Sambridge,et al.  Trans-dimensional inverse problems, model comparison and the evidence , 2006 .

[36]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Comparison of Stochastic Sampling Algorithms for Uncertainty Quantification , 2010 .

[37]  Yasin Hajizadeh,et al.  Application of Differential Evolution as a New Method for Automatic History Matching , 2009 .

[38]  Michael Andrew Christie,et al.  Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: a comparison of upscaling techniques , 2001 .

[39]  Albert C. Reynolds,et al.  Results of the Brugge Benchmark Study for Flooding Optimization and History Matching , 2010 .

[40]  Mike Christie,et al.  Uncertainty quantification for porous media flows , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[41]  Hirofumi Okano,et al.  Quantification of Uncertainty in Relative Permeability for Coarse-Scale Reservoir Simulation , 2005 .