It is agreed that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from energy and transport systems must be reduced. Technical means exist to reduce GHG emissions from these sources. However, these emission-reduction measures are not implemented to a high enough degree. In this thesis, it is assumed that this is because the reduction of GHG emissions from energy and transport systems is a wicked problem. Unlike a tame problem, which has an unambiguous definition and a finite number of well-defined solutions, a wicked problem is difficult to define, and its solutions are often intertwined with the problem. The “wickedness” of a wicked problem lies in the extreme difficulty of solving the problem, rather than in the problem itself.In this thesis, the wicked problem of reducing GHG emissions from energy and transport systems is studied by applying a sociotechnical systems approach to the introduction of renewable vehicle fuels, the production and use of biogas, the introduction of electric vehicles, and the sustainability of district heating. In addition, this thesis discusses how energy issues are approached in different contexts, and what implications different actions can have on GHG emissions. The analysis shows that a sociotechnical approach to energy systems analysis can offer insights with regard to how system boundaries are handled within GHG-emission assessments and energy and transport policy. By problematising the use of system boundaries in GHG-emission assessments, this thesis explains how attempts to reduce GHG emissions could add to the wicked problem of GHGemission reductions from energy and transport systems. GHG-emission assessments can give very different results depending on system boundaries. While these results can be used in attempts to solve this wicked problem, they can also contribute to complicating it. As solutions to wicked problems are mainly found in policy, the use of system boundaries in policy is studied. Results show that narrow system boundaries in energy and transport policy can hamper sustainable development of energy and transport systems. The use of wider system boundaries could facilitate approaches to solve the wicked problem of reducing GHG emissions from energy and transport systems by making the consequences and effects of policy actions more clearly visible.
[1]
Dag Henning,et al.
Comparison between material and energy recovery of municipal waste from an energy perspective: A study of two Swedish municipalities
,
2004
.
[2]
Pål Börjesson,et al.
Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions
,
2006
.
[3]
Mattias Höjer,et al.
How much transport can the climate stand?--Sweden on a sustainable path in 2050
,
2006
.
[4]
Mikael Lantz,et al.
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels in Sweden
,
2010
.
[5]
Edgard Gnansounou,et al.
Life-Cycle Assessment of Biofuels
,
2011
.
[6]
T. P. Hughes,et al.
Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930
,
1984
.
[7]
Martina Wikström,et al.
Pathways to a renewable road transport system in Stockholm 2030
,
2011
.
[8]
Pål Börjesson,et al.
Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems
,
2007
.
[9]
T. Pinch,et al.
The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other
,
1984
.
[10]
Erik Dotzauer,et al.
Greenhouse gas emissions from power generation and consumption in a nordic perspective
,
2010
.
[11]
Erik G. Lindfeldt,et al.
The Swedish policy instruments’ inconsistent valuation of avoided CO2 emissions
,
2006
.
[12]
Maria Berglund,et al.
Biogas production from a systems analytical perspective
,
2006
.