Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study.

OBJECTIVE Digital mammography combined with tomosynthesis is gaining clinical acceptance, but data are limited that show its impact in the clinical environment. We assessed the changes in performance measures, if any, after the introduction of tomosynthesis systems into our clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this observational study, we used verified practice- and outcome-related databases to compute and compare recall rates, biopsy rates, cancer detection rates, and positive predictive values for six radiologists who interpreted screening mammography studies without (n = 13,856) and with (n = 9499) the use of tomosynthesis. Two-sided analyses (significance declared at p < 0.05) accounting for reader variability, age of participants, and whether the examination in question was a baseline were performed. RESULTS For the group as a whole, the introduction and routine use of tomosynthesis resulted in significant observed changes in recall rates from 8.7% to 5.5% (p < 0.001), nonsignificant changes in biopsy rates from 15.2 to 13.5 per 1000 screenings (p = 0.59), and cancer detection rates from 4.0 to 5.4 per 1000 screenings (p = 0.18). The invasive cancer detection rate increased from 2.8 to 4.3 per 1000 screening examinations (p = 0.07). The positive predictive value for recalls increased from 4.7% to 10.1% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The introduction of breast tomosynthesis into our practice was associated with a significant reduction in recall rates and a simultaneous increase in breast cancer detection rates.

[1]  Susanna M Cramb,et al.  The descriptive epidemiology of female breast cancer: an international comparison of screening, incidence, survival and mortality. , 2012, Cancer epidemiology.

[2]  David Gur,et al.  Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[3]  V. Kataja,et al.  Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.

[4]  J. Baker,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis: state-of-the-art and review of the literature. , 2011, Academic radiology.

[5]  L. Tabár,et al.  Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. , 2011, Radiology.

[6]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. , 2009, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  David Gur,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance study. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  P. Skaane,et al.  Observer variability in screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading , 2008, European Radiology.

[9]  Tor D Tosteson,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Elizabeth A Rafferty,et al.  Digital mammography: novel applications. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[11]  Yulei Jiang,et al.  Breast cancer detection rate: designing imaging trials to demonstrate improvements. , 2007, Radiology.

[12]  Michael J Schell,et al.  Recall and detection rates in screening mammography , 2004, Cancer.

[13]  Emily F Conant,et al.  Evaluation of proscriptive health care policy implementation in screening mammography. , 2003, Radiology.

[14]  D. Miglioretti,et al.  Individual and Combined Effects of Age, Breast Density, and Hormone Replacement Therapy Use on the Accuracy of Screening Mammography , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  S. Woolf,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  D. Wolverton,et al.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  H. Sox,et al.  Postmenopausal Hormone Replacement Therapy and the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  L. Tabár,et al.  The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties , 2002, Cancer.

[19]  L. Tabár,et al.  Beyond randomized controlled trials , 2001, Cancer.

[20]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  P. Tan,et al.  Results of intermediate measures from a population‐based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among asian women , 1998 .

[22]  P. Tan,et al.  Results of intermediate measures of a population‐based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project , 1998, Cancer.

[23]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[24]  Craig A. Beam,et al.  Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists. Findings from a national sample. , 1996, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 Years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.

[26]  S. Rubin,et al.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. , 1995, JAMA.

[27]  J. Elmore,et al.  Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.