Graphical Arterial Blood Gas Visualization Tool Supports Rapid and Accurate Data Interpretation

A visualization tool that integrates numeric information from an arterial blood gas report with novel graphics was designed for the purpose of promoting rapid and accurate interpretation of acid-base data. A study compared data interpretation performance when arterial blood gas results were presented in a traditional numerical list versus the graphical visualization tool. Critical-care nurses (n = 15) and nursing students (n = 15) were significantly more accurate identifying acid-base states and assessing trends in acid-base data when using the graphical visualization tool. Critical-care nurses and nursing students using traditional numerical data had an average accuracy of 69% and 74%, respectively. Using the visualization tool, average accuracy improved to 83% for critical-care nurses and 93% for nursing students. Analysis of response times demonstrated that the visualization tool might help nurses overcome the "speed/accuracy trade-off" during high-stress situations when rapid decisions must be rendered. Perceived mental workload was significantly reduced for nursing students when they used the graphical visualization tool. In this study, the effects of implementing the graphical visualization were greater for nursing students than for critical-care nurses, which may indicate that the experienced nurses needed more training and use of the new technology prior to testing to show similar gains. Results of the objective and subjective evaluations support the integration of this graphical visualization tool into clinical environments that require accurate and timely interpretation of arterial blood gas data.

[1]  Carl B. Marbach,et al.  Computer-Based Instruction and Diagnosis of Acid-Base Disorders: A Systematic Approach , 1973 .

[2]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[3]  M. Skaredoff.  A computerized system for rapid interpretation of acid/base disorders. , 1986, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[4]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[5]  J L Willems,et al.  Computer aided interpretation of acid-base disorders. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[6]  K B Bennett,et al.  Graphical Displays: Implications for Divided Attention, Focused Attention, and Problem Solving , 1992, Human factors.

[7]  Felix Vergara.  Evaluating the Accuracy of and Time Spent in Analysis of Acid-Base Reports by Three Methods: Is a Computer-Aided Method Best? , 1998, AMIA.

[8]  B. Shoulders-Odom.  Using an algorithm to interpret arterial blood gases. , 2000, Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCN.

[9]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Supporting Situation Assessment Through Attention Guidance: A Cost-Benefit and Depth of Processing Analysis , 2001 .

[10]  K. Kirksey,et al.  An easy method for interpreting the results of arterial blood gas analysis. , 2001, Critical care nurse.

[11]  Nancy Staggers.  Human factors: imperative concepts for information systems in critical care. , 2003, AACN clinical issues.

[12]  P. Woodrow.  Arterial blood gas analysis. , 2004, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[13]  H. Simpson.  Interpretation of arterial blood gases: a clinical guide for nurses. , 2004, British journal of nursing.

[14]  Jennifer McGovern Narkevicius,et al.  Human Characteristics and Measures in Systems Design , 2005 .

[15]  Frank Drews,et al.  The Right Picture Is Worth a Thousand Numbers: Data Displays in Anesthesia , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[16]  M. Ms,et al.  Evaluations of Physiological Monitoring Displays: A Systematic Review , 2007, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[17]  Nancy Staggers,et al.  Evaluations of Physiological Monitoring Displays: A Systematic Review , 2008, Journal of clinical monitoring and computing.