Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters.

The objective of this study was to determine the factors affecting somatic cell count (SCC), to estimate variance components of these factors, and to calculate and evaluate the thresholds for intramammary infection based on SCC. The infection status from 22,467 quarter milk samples from 544 cows in seven herds was determined. Infections status was the most important factor affecting SCC. The increase in SCC was more pronounced for major pathogens than for minor pathogens. Even after adjustment for infection status, the interaction between stage of lactation and parity was significant. For culture-negative samples within a lactation, the shape of the SCC curve was inversely related to the shape of the milk production curve. The shape of the SCC curve was flat for first lactation cows compared with the shape of the SCC curve for cows in subsequent lactations. The effect of clinical mastitis on SCC was significant. The use of SCC thresholds for specific parities and stages of lactation to detect intramammary infection improved quality parameters only slightly over a fixed threshold of 200,000 cells/ml.

[1]  H. Barkema,et al.  The effect of discontinuation of postmilking teat disinfection in low somatic cell count herds. I. Incidence of clinical mastitis. , 1997, The Veterinary quarterly.

[2]  C. Frith.  Principles and methods , 1997 .

[3]  E. B. Burnside,et al.  Genetic relationships between clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, and udder conformation in Danish Holsteins , 1994 .

[4]  L. Fox,et al.  Coagulase-positive Staphylococcus intramammary infections in primiparous dairy cows. , 1994, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  T. Ichikawa,et al.  Variation in the Results of Bacteriologic Culturing and Indirect Diagnostic Methods for Staphylococcus aureus Infected Udder over a Two Month Period , 1993 .

[6]  J. Weller,et al.  Genetic and environmental relationships among somatic cell count, bacterial infection, and clinical mastitis. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  G. Shook,et al.  Prediction of mastitis using milk somatic cell count, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, and lactose. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[8]  D. Wilson,et al.  Microbiological results from milk samples obtained premilking and postmilking for the diagnosis of bovine intramammary infections. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  M. Paape,et al.  Variation in milk somatic cells of heifers at first calving. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[10]  I. Dohoo,et al.  Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intramammary infections , 1991 .

[11]  P. Bartlett,et al.  Milk production and somatic cell count in Michigan dairy herds. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  R. Gonzalez,et al.  Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infections. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  R. Harmon,et al.  Protocols for Evaluating Efficacy of Postmilking Teat Dips , 1990 .

[14]  H. H. Dowlen,et al.  Efficacy of chlorhexidine as a postmilking teat disinfectant for the prevention of bovine mastitis during lactation. , 1990, Journal of dairy science.

[15]  H. Wisselink,et al.  Dutch national mastitis survey. The effect of herd and animal factors on somatic cell count , 1989 .

[16]  Preben Willeberg,et al.  Veterinary epidemiology: Principles and methods: by S.W. Martin, A.H. Meek and P. Willeberg. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA 50010, 1987, 343 pp., price US$30.95 (plus US$1.50 postage/handling for first copy; US$0.75 for additional copies), ISBN 0-8138-1856-7 , 1989 .

[17]  D. G. White,et al.  Effects of teat dipping on intramammary infections by staphylococci other than Staphylococcus aureus. , 1987, Journal of dairy science.

[18]  J.B.M. Wilmink,et al.  Studies on test-day and lactation milk, fat and protein yield of dairy cows , 1987 .

[19]  J. Reneau.  Effective use of dairy herd improvement somatic cell counts in mastitis control. , 1986, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  S. Spahr,et al.  Comparison of electrical conductivity of milk with other indirect methods for detection of subclinical mastitis. , 1985, Journal of dairy science.

[21]  L. Brolund.  Cell counts in bovine milk. Causes of variation and applicability for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis. , 1985, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[22]  R. Miller.  Traits for sire selection related to udder health and management. , 1984, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  U. Emanuelson,et al.  Studies on Somatic Cell Counts in Milk from Swedish Dairy Cows: I. Non-genetic Causes of Variation in Monthly Test-day Results , 1984 .

[24]  U. Emanuelson.  Studies on Somatic Cell Counts in Milk of Swedish Dairy Cows , 1984 .

[25]  R. P. Natzke,et al.  Predictability by somatic cell counts related to prevalence of intrammary infection within herds. , 1982, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  B. Kennedy,et al.  Environmental Factors Influencing Test-Day Somatic Cell Counts in Holsteins , 1982 .

[27]  U. Lindström,et al.  Usefulness of Cell Counts in Predicting Bovine Mastitis , 1981 .

[28]  G. Shook,et al.  An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. , 1980 .

[29]  R. Kramer,et al.  Lactose and cell content of samples from individual milkings, as affected by udder infections and systematic influences. , 1980 .

[30]  J. W. Smith,et al.  Variation in cell content of milk associated with time of sample collection. I. Diurnal variation. , 1967, Journal of dairy science.