Arabic Translation, Validation and Cultural Adaptation of the 7-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in Two Community Samples.

Objectives Depression is a common mental disorder, the severity of which is frequently assessed via interview-based clinical scales such as the 7-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-7). The current study aimed to translate and examine the validity of an Arabic version of the HAMD-7 scale. Methods This study took place between February and March 2016 in the Psychiatry Department of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The HAMD-7 scale was translated into Arabic using forward and backward translation methods. A total of 153 Arabic speakers were recruited to test the translated scale, including 57 medical students and 96 members of the general public. The Arabic version of the HAMD-7 scale was completed by trained investigators during face-to-face interviews with the participants. In order to assess convergent validity, participants also completed an Arabic version of the self-assessed Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scale. Subsequently, the test-retest reliability of the translated HAMD-7 scale was evaluated two weeks later during a second interview. Results Overall, HAMD-7 scores were positively correlated with PHQ-9 scores (r = 0.633-0.749). Moreover, the translated HAMD-7 scale proved to be reliable in terms of test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.807; P <0.001). With regards to internal consistency, the Cronbach's α values ranged between 0.607-0.756. Conclusion The Arabic HAMD-7 scale was found to be reliable and valid among two samples of Arabic speakers in Saudi Arabia. However, further research among Arab-speaking patients diagnosed with depression is needed in order to establish its usefulness in assessing the severity of depressive symptoms.

[1]  Chin-Pang Lee,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of a 6‐item Chinese version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: Mokken scaling and item analysis , 2017, Asia-Pacific psychiatry : official journal of the Pacific Rim College of Psychiatrists.

[2]  Y. Bachner Psychometric Properties of Responses to an Arabic Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) , 2016, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[3]  P. Bech,et al.  Psychometric properties of responses by clinicians and older adults to a 6-item Hebrew version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) , 2013, BMC Psychiatry.

[4]  Valmi D Sousa,et al.  Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. , 2011, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[5]  M. Roca,et al.  Prevalence and comorbidity of common mental disorders in primary care. , 2009, Journal of affective disorders.

[6]  C. Hewitt,et al.  Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis , 2007, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[7]  Y. Lecrubier,et al.  The Ham D6 is more homogenous and as sensitive as the Ham D17☆ , 2007, European Psychiatry.

[8]  Sidney H. Kennedy,et al.  Measuring the severity of depression and remission in primary care: validation of the HAMD-7 scale , 2005, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[9]  R. Spitzer,et al.  Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. , 1999, JAMA.

[10]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study , 1997, The Lancet.

[11]  Janet B W Williams,et al.  A structured interview guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. , 1988, Archives of general psychiatry.

[12]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[13]  P. Bech,et al.  QUANTITATIVE RATING OF DEPRESSIVE STATES , 1975, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[14]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  Janet B W Williams Standardizing the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale: past, present, and future , 2009, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience.

[16]  Y. Lecrubier,et al.  The Ham D(6) is more homogenous and as sensitive as the Ham D(17). , 2007, European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists.

[17]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[18]  W. Zung A SELF-RATING DEPRESSION SCALE. , 1965, Archives of general psychiatry.