Losses, hopes, and expectations for sustainable futures after COVID

[1]  Ross Campbell.  The upswing: how America came together a century ago and how we can do it again , 2021, Journal of Contemporary European Studies.

[2]  S. Attari,et al.  Investigating similarities and differences in individual reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate crisis , 2021, Climatic Change.

[3]  Andrea L. Glaser,et al.  Democracy in times of the pandemic: explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies across European democracies , 2021 .

[4]  Steffen Kallbekken,et al.  Public support for air travel restrictions to address COVID-19 or climate change , 2021, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[5]  J. Millward-Hopkins.  Back to the future: Old values for a new (more equal) world , 2021 .

[6]  Juan Rafael Ruiz,et al.  A green new deal and debt sustainability for the post COVID-19 world , 2021 .

[7]  S. van der Linden.  The Gateway Belief Model (GBM): A review and research agenda for communicating the scientific consensus on climate change. , 2021, Current opinion in psychology.

[8]  C. Brick,et al.  Supplementary materials to: Even conservative voters want the environment to be at the heart of post-COVID-19 economic reconstruction in the UK , 2021 .

[9]  David Rosner,et al.  Building Back a Better Sustainable World , 2020 .

[10]  R. Walensky,et al.  Clinical Outcomes Of A COVID-19 Vaccine: Implementation Over Efficacy. , 2020, Health affairs.

[11]  C. Bell,et al.  Psychological distress, anxiety, family violence, suicidality, and wellbeing in New Zealand during the COVID-19 lockdown: A cross-sectional study , 2020, PloS one.

[12]  R. Hamann.  The Promise and Peril of “Building Back Better” , 2020 .

[13]  L. Steg,et al.  Insights from early COVID-19 responses about promoting sustainable action , 2020, Nature Sustainability.

[14]  D. Shepherd.  COVID 19 and Entrepreneurship: Time to Pivot? , 2020 .

[15]  H. Morris.  Constructing the Millennial “Other” in United States Press Coverage of the Green New Deal , 2020 .

[16]  R. McIntyre,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review , 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders.

[17]  Miguel Goede.  COVID-19 and Change , 2020, Archives of Business Research.

[18]  F. Gobbi,et al.  COVID-19: Exposing and addressing health disparities among ethnic minorities and migrants , 2020, Journal of travel medicine.

[19]  A. Londei,et al.  Ranking the effectiveness of worldwide COVID-19 government interventions , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[20]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Using the COVID-19 economic crisis to frame climate change as a secondary issue reduces mitigation support , 2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology.

[21]  P. Manning,et al.  COVID-19: Lessons for the climate change emergency , 2020, Science of The Total Environment.

[22]  G. Serafini,et al.  The psychological impact of COVID-19 on the mental health in the general population , 2020, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[23]  H. Clark,et al.  Invest in health and uphold rights to “build back better” after COVID-19 , 2020, Sexual and reproductive health matters.

[24]  J. Shogren,et al.  Do the Benefits of COVID‐19 Policies Exceed the Costs? Exploring Uncertainties in the Age–VSL Relationship , 2020, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[25]  Zoë B. Cullen,et al.  The impact of COVID-19 on small business outcomes and expectations , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  F. Baum,et al.  The COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies , 2020 .

[27]  T. Lancet,et al.  The plight of essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, The Lancet.

[28]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Combatting climate change misinformation: Evidence for longevity of inoculation and consensus messaging effects , 2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology.

[29]  M. Harrison,et al.  A Turning Point, Securitization, and Policing in the Context of Covid-19: Building a New Social Contract Between State and Nation? , 2020, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.

[30]  A. L. Schmidt,et al.  Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19 , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Morgan,et al.  COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak , 2020, The Lancet.

[32]  M. Kavanagh.  Authoritarianism, outbreaks, and information politics , 2020, The Lancet Public Health.

[33]  E. Ip,et al.  COVID-19 emergency measures and the impending authoritarian pandemic , 2020, Journal of law and the biosciences.

[34]  I. Kvangraven,et al.  Changing the narrative: economics after COVID-19. (Special Issue: The impact of the covid-19 pandemic.) , 2020 .

[35]  B. Field.  COVID-19 lessons for climate change , 2019 .

[36]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  Science by social media: Attitudes towards climate change are mediated by perceived social consensus , 2019, Memory & Cognition.

[37]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  Exposure to Scientific Consensus Does Not Cause Psychological Reactance , 2019, Environmental Communication.

[38]  D. Spini,et al.  A Contingent Perspective on Pluralistic Ignorance: When the Attitudinal Object Matters , 2019, International Journal of Public Opinion Research.

[39]  Matthew H. Goldberg,et al.  Perceived Social Consensus Can Reduce Ideological Biases on Climate Change , 2019, Environment and Behavior.

[40]  Adam R. Pearson,et al.  Diverse segments of the US public underestimate the environmental concerns of minority and low-income Americans , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  B. P. Kaltenborn,et al.  Cool dudes in Norway: climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men , 2018, Environmental Sociology.

[42]  Markus Brauer,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models and the Analysis of Nonindependent Data: A Unified Framework to Analyze Categorical and Continuous Independent Variables that Vary Within-Subjects and/or Within-Items , 2017, Psychological methods.

[43]  D. Tingley,et al.  Beliefs about Climate Beliefs: The Importance of Second-Order Opinions for Climate Politics , 2017 .

[44]  Christiane Eilders,et al.  Design Matters! An Empirical Analysis of Online Deliberation on Different News Platforms , 2017 .

[45]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion , 2016 .

[46]  A. Acquisti,et al.  Beyond the Turk: Alternative Platforms for Crowdsourcing Behavioral Research , 2016 .

[47]  Peter Green,et al.  SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation , 2016 .

[48]  David M. Farrell,et al.  When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish Citizens’ Assembly , 2016 .

[49]  J. Carlin,et al.  Beyond Power Calculations , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[50]  J. Bohr.  Public views on the dangers and importance of climate change: predicting climate change beliefs in the United States through income moderated by party identification , 2014, Climatic Change.

[51]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[52]  K. R. Priya.  Grounded Theory Methodology , 2013 .

[53]  Z. Leviston,et al.  Your opinion on climate change might not be as common as you think , 2013 .

[54]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science , 2013 .

[55]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Spotlights, Floodlights, and the Magic Number Zero: Simple Effects Tests in Moderated Regression , 2012 .

[56]  M. Ojala.  Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people , 2012 .

[57]  B. Megyesi,et al.  Energy use, climate change and folk psychology: Does sustainability have a chance? Results from a qualitative study in five European countries , 2011 .

[58]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Mapping the moral domain. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  Lawrence C. Hamilton,et al.  Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects , 2011 .

[60]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public , 2010 .

[61]  Sophie A. Nicholson-Cole.  Promoting Positive Engagement With Climate Change Through Visual and Iconic Representations , 2009 .

[62]  A. Todorov,et al.  Public Opinion on Foreign Policy The Multilateral Public that Perceives Itself as Unilateral , 2004 .

[63]  V. Heys,et al.  States of emergency. , 1999, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[64]  Jacob Shamir,et al.  Pluralistic Ignorance Across Issues and Over Time: Information Cues and Biases , 1997 .

[65]  J. M. Maravall.  The Myth of the Authoritarian Advantage , 2008 .

[66]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  Brian Mullen,et al.  The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests , 1985 .

[68]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[69]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[70]  D. S. Holmes,et al.  Dimensions of projection. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[71]  J. Neyman,et al.  Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. , 1936 .