Demand response in adjustment markets for electricity

This article examines the participation of consumers in adjustment markets for electricity, which enable participants to respond to random supply shocks occurring after quantities have been contracted. If markets were perfect, opening the adjustment market to consumers would always increase ex post efficiency, hence welfare, as expected. In reality, some consumers hold private information on their value for electricity. We prove that under such information asymmetry, allowing consumers to participate in the adjustment market may reduce welfare. This arises because electricity suppliers in the model propose inefficient ex ante retail contracts to make them incentive compatible and to limit the information rents they must leave on the table for consumers to prevent them from misreporting their private information. If the value of ex post efficiency gains due to consumers’ participation in adjustment markets is low, whereas the information distortion is high, the overall net effect is a welfare decrease.

[1]  Lars Stole Price Discrimination and Competition , 2007 .

[2]  H. Chao,et al.  Incentive effects of paying demand response in wholesale electricity markets , 2013 .

[3]  Lars Stole,et al.  Price Discrimination in Competitive Environments , 2007 .

[4]  C. Crampes,et al.  Distributed load-shedding in the balancing of electricity markets , 2012, 2012 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market.

[5]  Jean Tirole,et al.  The Analysis of Tying Cases: A Primer , 2005 .

[6]  Hung-po Chao,et al.  Competitive electricity markets with consumer subscription service in a smart grid , 2012 .

[7]  J. Laffont,et al.  The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model , 2001 .

[8]  Shmuel S. Oren,et al.  Exotic Options for Interruptible Electricity Supply Contracts , 2002, Oper. Res..

[9]  H. Chao Price-Responsive Demand Management for a Smart Grid World , 2010 .

[10]  J. Torriti,et al.  Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation , 2010 .

[11]  Daniel F. Spulber OPTIMAL NONLINEAR PRICING AND CONTINGENT CONTRACTS , 1992 .

[12]  Catherine Waddams Price,et al.  Do Consumers Switch to the Best Supplier , 2007 .

[13]  Shmuel S. Oren A Historical Perspective and Business Model for Load Response Aggregation Based on Priority Service , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets , 2002 .