Penetration depth limits of in vivo confocal reflectance imaging.

We present experiments to predict the maximum penetration depth atwhich typical biological structures in amelanotic tissue can bedetected with confocal microscopy. The detected signal is examinedas the signal source strength (index of refraction mismatch), thesource depth, and the medium scattering coefficient are varied. Thedetected background produced by scattering outside the focal volume isexamined as the medium scattering coefficient, the depth in the medium, the dimensionless pinhole radius, nu(p), and theshape of the scattering phase function are varied. When the systemapproaches ideal confocal performance (nu(p) ? 3), the penetration depth is limited by the signal-to-noiseratio to approximately 3-4 optical depths (OD's) for a 0.05 indexmismatch. As nu(p) increases to 8, thepenetration depth is limited by the signal-to-background ratio and isdependent on the scattering coefficient. At mu(s) = 100 cm(-1) (l(s) = 100 mum) and an index mismatch of 0.05, the maximum penetrationdepth is approximately 2 OD.

[1]  T. Wilson,et al.  The Role of the Pinhole in Confocal Imaging Systems , 1990 .

[2]  H. D. Cavanagh,et al.  In vivo, real-time confocal imaging. , 1991, Journal of electron microscopy technique.

[3]  R. Webb,et al.  In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin: melanin provides strong contrast. , 1995, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[4]  A J Welch,et al.  Sources of contrast in confocal reflectance imaging. , 1996, Applied optics.

[5]  E Gratton,et al.  Possible correlation between blood glucose concentration and the reduced scattering coefficient of tissues in the near infrared. , 1994, Optics letters.

[6]  B R Masters,et al.  Real-time scanning slit confocal microscopy of the in vivo human cornea. , 1994, Applied optics.

[7]  H. V. Hulst Light Scattering by Small Particles , 1957 .

[8]  A H Hielscher,et al.  Influence of the scattering phase function on light transport measurements in turbid media performed with small source-detector separations. , 1996, Optics letters.

[9]  M Gu,et al.  University of Birmingham Influence of spherical aberration on axial imaging of confocal reflection microscopy , 2006 .

[10]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Optical coherence microscopy in scattering media. , 1994, Optics letters.

[11]  Wolfgang Rudolph,et al.  Comparative study of confocal and heterodyne microscopy for imaging through scattering media , 1996 .

[12]  Andrew K. Dunn,et al.  Three-dimensional computation of light scattering from cells , 1996 .

[13]  W. Star,et al.  Light dosimetry in vivo. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  A. Welch,et al.  Determining the optical properties of turbid mediaby using the adding-doubling method. , 1993, Applied optics.

[15]  J. Schmitt,et al.  Confocal microscopy in turbid media. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.