Detecting gender item bias and differential manifest response behavior: A Rasch-based solution

[1]  Georg Rasch,et al.  Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests , 1981, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  Curt Hagquist,et al.  Real and Artificial Differential Item Functioning , 2012 .

[4]  Marie-Odile Richard,et al.  A Proposed Model of Online Consumer Behavior: Assessing the Role of Gender , 2010 .

[5]  C. Routledge,et al.  When death thoughts lead to death fears: Mortality salience increases death anxiety for individuals who lack meaning in life , 2010 .

[6]  Joshua D. Newton,et al.  A Profile of Australian Adults Who Have Discussed Their Posthumous Organ Donation Wishes With Family Members , 2010, Journal of health communication.

[7]  David Andrich,et al.  Understanding the Response Structure and Process in the Polytomous Rasch Model , 2010 .

[8]  Yongjun Sung,et al.  Understanding Attitudes Toward and Behaviors in Response to Product Placement , 2010 .

[9]  Martijn G. de Jong,et al.  Socially Desirable Response Tendencies in Survey Research , 2010 .

[10]  E. Wong,et al.  EXPLORING THE ORIGINS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN: IMPLICATIONS FOR ADVERTISERS , 2010 .

[11]  Thomas Salzberger,et al.  Measurement in Marketing Research: An Alternative Framework , 2009 .

[12]  K. Vohs,et al.  Sex in Advertising: Gender Differences and the Role of Relationship Commitment , 2009 .

[13]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Are Women More Loyal Customers than Men? Gender Differences in Loyalty to Firms and Individual Service Providers , 2009 .

[14]  Gloria Moss.  Gender, Design and Marketing: How Gender Drives our Perception of Design and Marketing , 2009 .

[15]  Yoo-Kyoung Seock,et al.  Hispanic consumers' shopping orientation and apparel retail store evaluation criteria , 2008 .

[16]  D. Alden,et al.  Diffusion of Measurement Invariance Assessment in Cross-National Empirical Marketing Research: Perspectives from the Literature and a Survey of Researchers , 2008 .

[17]  Jean-Paul Fox,et al.  Relaxing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research Using a Hierarchical IRT Model , 2007 .

[18]  M. Luxen.  Sex Differences, Evolutionary Psychology and Biosocial Theory , 2007 .

[19]  R. Snipes,et al.  Gender bias in customer evaluations of service quality: an empirical investigation , 2006 .

[20]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  AN ALTERNATE APPROACH TO ASSESSING CROSS-CULTURAL MEASUREMENT EQUIVALENCE IN ADVERTISING RESEARCH , 2005 .

[21]  B. Carleton,et al.  The Dimensionality and Gender Differential Item Functioning of the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ) , 2004 .

[22]  D. Andrich,et al.  Is the sense of coherence-instrument applicable on adolescents? A latent trait analysis using Rasch-modelling , 2004 .

[23]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Tackling measurement problems with Item Response Theory: Principles, characteristics, and assessment, with an illustrative example , 2004 .

[24]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  The Urge to Splurge: A Terror Management Account of Materialism and Consumer Behavior , 2004 .

[25]  J. Arndt,et al.  Death Can Be Good for Your Health: Fitness Intentions as a Proximal and Distal Defense Against Mortality Salience , 2003 .

[26]  Bryan S. Schaffer,et al.  A Review of Cross-Cultural Methodologies for Organizational Research: A Best- Practices Approach , 2003 .

[27]  Lori D. Wolin.  Gender Issues in Advertising , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[28]  G. Alexander.  An Evolutionary Perspective of Sex-Typed Toy Preferences: Pink, Blue, and the Brain , 2003, Archives of sexual behavior.

[29]  D. Lester,et al.  THE COLLETT-LESTER FEAR OF DEATH SCALE: A CORRECTION , 2003, Death studies.

[30]  Svend Kreiner,et al.  Testing unidimensionality in polytomous Rasch models , 2002 .

[31]  P. Salovey,et al.  Sex differences in jealousy: evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  W. Spector,et al.  Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[33]  Everett V. Smith.  Understanding Rasch Measurement: Detecting and Evaluating the Impact of Multidimensionality Using Item Fit Statistics and Principal Components Analysis of Residuals. , 2002 .

[34]  Everett V. Smith.  Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. , 2002, Journal of applied measurement.

[35]  S Kreiner,et al.  Item bias in indices measuring psychosocial work environment and health. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[36]  Lynnette Zelezny,et al.  New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism , 2000 .

[37]  S. Embretson,et al.  Item response theory for psychologists , 2000 .

[38]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Testing Factorial Invariance across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method , 1999 .

[39]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[40]  S. Severiens,et al.  Gender and learning: Comparing two theories , 1998 .

[41]  Additive scoring of reported symptomsValidity and item bias problems in morbidity scales , 1996 .

[42]  P. Salovey,et al.  Evolutionary Origins of Sex Differences in Jealousy? Questioning the “Fitness” of the Model , 1996 .

[43]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Measurement Issues in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[44]  D. Buss,et al.  Psychological Sex Differences: Origins through Sexual Selection. , 1995 .

[45]  David Andrich.  Further remarks on nondichotomization of graded responses , 1995 .

[46]  David Andrich,et al.  Models for measurement, precision, and the nondichotomization of graded responses , 1995 .

[47]  D. Buss,et al.  Evolutionary Psychology: A New Paradigm for Psychological Science , 1995 .

[48]  A. Eagly.  Sex Differences in Human Social Behavior: Meta-Analytic Studies of Social Psychological Research , 1993 .

[49]  Wendy Wood,et al.  Sex Differences in Interaction Style in Task Groups , 1992 .

[50]  W. Meck,et al.  The organizational effects of gonadal steroids on sexually dimorphic spatial ability , 1991, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[51]  A. Eagly,et al.  Explaining Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Perspective , 1991 .

[52]  D. Halpern.  The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: What you see depends on where you look. , 1989 .

[53]  D. Andrich.  A General Form of Rasch's Extended Logistic Model for Partial Credit Scoring , 1988 .

[54]  A. Eagly,et al.  The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles , 1987 .

[55]  Judith A. Hall.  On explaining gender differences: The case of nonverbal communication. , 1987 .

[56]  A. Eagly.  Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation , 1987 .

[57]  Richard M. Smith.  Person Fit in the Rasch Model , 1986 .

[58]  D. Halpern.  Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[59]  Judith A. Hall.  Nonverbal sex differences : communication accuracy and expressive style , 1984 .

[60]  Erling B. Andersen,et al.  Latent Trait Models and Ability Parameter Estimation , 1982 .

[61]  G. Masters.  A rasch model for partial credit scoring , 1982 .

[62]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale , 1981 .

[63]  S. Bem.  Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. , 1981 .

[64]  D. Andrich.  A rating formulation for ordered response categories , 1978 .

[65]  D. Andrich.  Application of a Psychometric Rating Model to Ordered Categories Which Are Scored with Successive Integers , 1978 .

[66]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .