A data review and re-assessment of ovarian cancer serum proteomic profiling

BackgroundThe early detection of ovarian cancer has the potential to dramatically reduce mortality. Recently, the use of mass spectrometry to develop profiles of patient serum proteins, combined with advanced data mining algorithms has been reported as a promising method to achieve this goal. In this report, we analyze the Ovarian Dataset 8-7-02 downloaded from the Clinical Proteomics Program Databank website, using nonparametric statistics and stepwise discriminant analysis to develop rules to diagnose patients, as well as to understand general patterns in the data that may guide future research.ResultsThe mass spectrometry serum profiles derived from cancer and controls exhibited numerous statistical differences. For example, use of the Wilcoxon test in comparing the intensity at each of the 15,154 mass to charge (M/Z) values between the cancer and controls, resulted in the detection of 3,591 M/Z values whose intensities differed by a p-value of 10-6 or less. The region containing the M/Z values of greatest statistical difference between cancer and controls occurred at M/Z values less than 500. For example the M/Z values of 2.7921478 and 245.53704 could be used to significantly separate the cancer from control groups. Three other sets of M/Z values were developed using a training set that could distinguish between cancer and control subjects in a test set with 100% sensitivity and specificity.ConclusionThe ability to discriminate between cancer and control subjects based on the M/Z values of 2.7921478 and 245.53704 reveals the existence of a significant non-biologic experimental bias between these two groups. This bias may invalidate attempts to use this dataset to find patterns of reproducible diagnostic value. To minimize false discovery, results using mass spectrometry and data mining algorithms should be carefully reviewed and benchmarked with routine statistical methods.

[1]  P. Schellhammer,et al.  Boosted decision tree analysis of surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectral serum profiles discriminates prostate cancer from noncancer patients. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[2]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Clinical proteomics: translating benchside promise into bedside reality , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[3]  P. Schellhammer,et al.  Serum protein fingerprinting coupled with a pattern-matching algorithm distinguishes prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia and healthy men. , 2002, Cancer research.

[4]  Lance A Liotta,et al.  Genomics and proteomics: application of novel technology to early detection and prevention of cancer. , 2002, Cancer detection and prevention.

[5]  M. Verma,et al.  Proteomics for cancer biomarker discovery. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[6]  G. Wright,et al.  Development of a novel proteomic approach for the detection of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in urine. , 2001, The American journal of pathology.

[7]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer , 2002, The Lancet.

[8]  O John Semmes,et al.  Normal, benign, preneoplastic, and malignant prostate cells have distinct protein expression profiles resolved by surface enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[9]  Jeffrey S. Morris,et al.  A comprehensive approach to the analysis of MALDI-TOF proteomics spectra from serum samples. , 2003 .

[10]  Y Chen,et al.  Evaluation of Plasma Lysophospholipids for Diagnostic Significance Using Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (ESI‐MS) Analyses , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Lance A. Liotta,et al.  Cancer Proteomics: The State of the Art , 2002, Disease markers.

[12]  M Markman,et al.  Lysophosphatidic acid as a potential biomarker for ovarian and other gynecologic cancers. , 1998, JAMA.

[13]  E. Petricoin,et al.  Serum proteomic patterns for detection of prostate cancer. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[14]  Yan Xu,et al.  Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry analysis of lysophospholipids in human ascitic fluids: comparison of the lysophospholipid contents in malignant vs nonmalignant ascitic fluids. , 2001, Analytical biochemistry.

[15]  E. Fung,et al.  Proteomic approaches to tumor marker discovery. , 2002, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[16]  L. Baudhuin,et al.  The Role and Clinical Applications of Bioactive Lysolipids in Ovarian Cancer , 2001, The Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: JSGI.

[17]  Daniel L Baker,et al.  Plasma lysophosphatidic acid concentration and ovarian cancer. , 2002, JAMA.

[18]  A. Vlahou,et al.  Proteomic approaches to biomarker discovery in prostate and bladder cancers , 2001, Proteomics.