Continuous Data-Driven Monitoring in Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Clinical Deterioration Model Development

Background Critical congenital heart disease (cCHD)—requiring cardiac intervention in the first year of life for survival—occurs globally in 2-3 of every 1000 live births. In the critical perioperative period, intensive multimodal monitoring at a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is warranted, as their organs—especially the brain—may be severely injured due to hemodynamic and respiratory events. These 24/7 clinical data streams yield large quantities of high-frequency data, which are challenging in terms of interpretation due to the varying and dynamic physiology innate to cCHD. Through advanced data science algorithms, these dynamic data can be condensed into comprehensible information, reducing the cognitive load on the medical team and providing data-driven monitoring support through automated detection of clinical deterioration, which may facilitate timely intervention. Objective This study aimed to develop a clinical deterioration detection algorithm for PICU patients with cCHD. Methods Retrospectively, synchronous per-second data of cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO2) and 4 vital parameters (respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and invasive mean blood pressure) in neonates with cCHD admitted to the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, between 2002 and 2018 were extracted. Patients were stratified based on mean oxygen saturation during admission to account for physiological differences between acyanotic and cyanotic cCHD. Each subset was used to train our algorithm in classifying data as either stable, unstable, or sensor dysfunction. The algorithm was designed to detect combinations of parameters abnormal to the stratified subpopulation and significant deviations from the patient’s unique baseline, which were further analyzed to distinguish clinical improvement from deterioration. Novel data were used for testing, visualized in detail, and internally validated by pediatric intensivists. Results A retrospective query yielded 4600 hours and 209 hours of per-second data in 78 and 10 neonates for, respectively, training and testing purposes. During testing, stable episodes occurred 153 times, of which 134 (88%) were correctly detected. Unstable episodes were correctly noted in 46 of 57 (81%) observed episodes. Twelve expert-confirmed unstable episodes were missed in testing. Time-percentual accuracy was 93% and 77% for, respectively, stable and unstable episodes. A total of 138 sensorial dysfunctions were detected, of which 130 (94%) were correct. Conclusions In this proof-of-concept study, a clinical deterioration detection algorithm was developed and retrospectively evaluated to classify clinical stability and instability, achieving reasonable performance considering the heterogeneous population of neonates with cCHD. Combined analysis of baseline (ie, patient-specific) deviations and simultaneous parameter-shifting (ie, population-specific) proofs would be promising with respect to enhancing applicability to heterogeneous critically ill pediatric populations. After prospective validation, the current—and comparable—models may, in the future, be used in the automated detection of clinical deterioration and eventually provide data-driven monitoring support to the medical team, allowing for timely intervention.

[1]  C. Carroll,et al.  The use of machine learning and artificial intelligence within pediatric critical care , 2022, Pediatric Research.

[2]  Steven P. Miller,et al.  Analyzing Continuous Physiologic Data to Find Hemodynamic Signatures Associated With New Brain Injury After Congenital Heart Surgery , 2022, Critical care explorations.

[3]  Spiros C. Denaxas,et al.  Critical appraisal of artificial intelligence-based prediction models for cardiovascular disease , 2022, European heart journal.

[4]  Lara J. Kanbar,et al.  Implementation of Machine Learning Pipelines for Clinical Practice: Development and Validation Study , 2022, JMIR medical informatics.

[5]  Jorge A. Gálvez,et al.  Early prediction of clinical deterioration using data-driven machine-learning modeling of electronic health records. , 2021, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  P. Devereaux,et al.  Machine Learning–Based Early Warning Systems for Clinical Deterioration: Systematic Scoping Review , 2021, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  W. Shim,et al.  Development and validation of a deep-learning-based pediatric early warning system: A single-center study , 2021, Biomedical journal.

[8]  M. Barkhuizen,et al.  Antenatal and Perioperative Mechanisms of Global Neurological Injury in Congenital Heart Disease , 2020, Pediatric Cardiology.

[9]  K. Fairchild,et al.  Continuous vital sign analysis for predicting and preventing neonatal diseases in the twenty-first century: big data to the forefront , 2019, Pediatric Research.

[10]  S. Villar,et al.  Logistic early warning scores to predict death, cardiac arrest or unplanned intensive care unit re‐admission after cardiac surgery , 2019, Anaesthesia.

[11]  G. Clermont,et al.  Predicting tachycardia as a surrogate for instability in the intensive care unit , 2019, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[12]  Nekane Larburu,et al.  Artificial Intelligence to Prevent Mobile Heart Failure Patients Decompensation in Real Time: Monitoring-Based Predictive Model , 2018, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Yuan Luo,et al.  Big Data and Data Science in Critical Care. , 2018, Chest.

[14]  Yeha Lee,et al.  Validation of deep-learning-based triage and acuity score using a large national dataset , 2018, PloS one.

[15]  P. Fister,et al.  Decreased tissue oxygenation in newborns with congenital heart defects: a case-control study , 2018, Croatian medical journal.

[16]  H. Nishina,et al.  The Hippo-YAP Pathway Regulates 3D Organ Formation and Homeostasis , 2018, Cancers.

[17]  A. Zaritsky,et al.  Pediatric Vital Sign Distribution Derived From a Multi-Centered Emergency Department Database , 2018, Front. Pediatr..

[18]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations , 2018 .

[19]  M. Benders,et al.  Neuroimaging, cardiovascular physiology, and functional outcomes in infants with congenital heart disease , 2017, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  Craig G Rusin,et al.  Prediction of imminent, severe deterioration of children with parallel circulations using real-time processing of physiologic data. , 2016, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  Xuejian Li,et al.  Adaptive online monitoring for ICU patients by combining just-in-time learning and principal component analysis , 2016, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[22]  G. Collins,et al.  Effect of Ebola Progression in Liberia , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  K. Moons,et al.  Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[24]  Rongrong Sun,et al.  Congenital Heart Disease: Causes, Diagnosis, Symptoms, and Treatments , 2015, Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics.

[25]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[26]  Steven P. Miller,et al.  Brain injury and development in newborns with critical congenital heart disease , 2013, Neurology.

[27]  David A. Clifton,et al.  A Large-Scale Clinical Validation of an Integrated Monitoring System in the Emergency Department , 2013, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[28]  A. Correa,et al.  Temporal Trends in Survival Among Infants With Critical Congenital Heart Defects , 2013, Pediatrics.

[29]  S. Seslar Cyanotic Heart Disease , 2012 .

[30]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  The changing epidemiology of congenital heart disease , 2011, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[31]  Saiful Islam,et al.  Mahalanobis Distance , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[32]  D. Massart,et al.  The Mahalanobis distance , 2000 .