Practice Prize Winner - Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press

We examine the problem of how a content provider, specifically the National Academies Press (NAP), can optimally price the different forms of its product---print and PDF---that it sells online. Whereas products in the traditional product line generally tend to be substitutes, the different content product forms could range from being substitutes to being complements across customers. Thus the content provider can possibly sell bundles of the product forms, leading to additional revenue. We first discuss NAP's decision context and describe the model we proposed for developing NAP's optimal pricing policies for its different forms. We describe the choice experiment we conducted on the publisher's website that maximally uses the online interface to collect relevant data needed to estimate our model. We show how NAP embraced the results from the model for developing a new business model and how it used the insights derived from the study to set pricing policies and monitor sales performance as a function of pricing. Finally, we perform validation of the model and the implemented policies using dynamic modeling of sales data from NAP's website. The paper illustrates how e-commerce technologies can lead to the development of optimal policies using marketing models.

[1]  W. Kamakura,et al.  Optimal Bundling and Pricing Under a Monopoly: Contrasting Complements and Substitutes from Independently Valued Products , 2003 .

[2]  W. Enders.  Applied Econometric Time Series , 1994 .

[3]  R. Venkatesh,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach to Pricing a Bundle of Products or Services , 1993 .

[4]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Optimal Designs for Discrete Choice Contingent Valuation Surveys: Single-Bound, Double-Bound, and Bivariate Models , 1995 .

[5]  V. Mahajan,et al.  A Reservation-Price Model for Optimal Pricing of Multiattribute Products in Conjoint Analysis , 1991 .

[6]  C. Dayton.  Latent Class Scaling Analysis , 1999 .

[7]  Morris A. Cohen,et al.  An Anatomy of a Decision-Support System for Developing and Launching Line Extensions , 1997 .

[8]  I. Png,et al.  Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions , 1992 .

[9]  F. Krauss.  Latent Structure Analysis , 1980 .

[10]  D. G. Morrison.  Purchase Intentions and Purchase Behavior , 1979 .

[11]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure , 1989 .

[12]  Janet L. Yellen,et al.  Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly , 1976 .

[13]  Steven R. Lerman,et al.  The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples , 1977 .

[14]  Gregory Dobson,et al.  Positioning and Pricing a Product Line , 1988 .

[15]  Rajiv K. Sinha,et al.  Preventing Digital Music Piracy: The Carrot or the Stick? , 2008 .

[16]  Hubert Gatignon,et al.  Optimal Product Line Pricing: The Influence of Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities , 1984 .

[17]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Persistence Modeling for Assessing Marketing Strategy Performance , 2003 .

[18]  New Products , Sales Promotions and Firm Value , With Application to the Automobile Industry , 2003 .

[19]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability , 1999 .

[20]  V. Rao,et al.  A General Choice Model for Bundles with Multiple-Category Products: Application to Market Segmentation and Optimal Pricing for Bundles , 2003 .

[21]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Dynamic Conversion Behavior at E-Commerce Sites , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  Bundling, unbundling, and pricing of multiform products: The case of magazine content , 2006 .

[23]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Latent Structure Analysis. , 1969 .

[24]  P. Phillips,et al.  Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root? , 1992 .

[25]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Models and Heuristics for Product Line Selection , 1985 .

[26]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Digital Piracy: A Competitive Analysis , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[27]  R. Kohli,et al.  Heuristics for Product-Line Design Using Conjoint Analysis , 1990 .

[28]  G. Dobson,et al.  Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data , 1993 .

[29]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[30]  K. McConnell.  Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation , 1990 .

[31]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Customizing Promotions in Online Stores , 2004 .

[32]  Neil Henry.  Latent structure analysis , 1969 .

[33]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[34]  Amiya K. Basu,et al.  The Metric Quality of Ordered Categorical Data , 1989 .

[35]  Charles B. Weinberg,et al.  Are Nonprofits Unfair Competitors for Businesses? An Analytical Approach , 2004 .

[36]  Dominique M. Hanssens,et al.  New Products, Sales Promotions, and Firm Value: The Case of the Automobile Industry , 2004 .

[37]  Catarina Sismeiro,et al.  A Model of Web Site Browsing Behavior Estimated on Clickstream Data , 2003 .

[38]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  Gaussian Demand and Commodity Bundling , 1984 .

[39]  V. Rao,et al.  A Balance Model for Evaluating Subsets of Multiattributed Items , 1976 .