Qualitative attentional changes with age in doing two tasks at once

Does practice reduce, or even eliminate, aging effects on the attentional limitations responsible for dual-task interference? The studies reviewed in this article show that age differences reliably persist after extensive practice. Strikingly, dual-task interference remains larger among older adults even in training conditions that allow them to achieve single-task performance as fast as younger adults. These findings demonstrate that age deficits in attentional functioning are robust. Advancing age also can be accompanied by improvements in cognitive functioning, such as in the ability to access the lexicon without attention (i.e., automatically), due to lifelong experience with word reading. Future research needs to establish whether age deficits in central attention are due to structural changes that are irreversible or reversible to some extent.

[1]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[2]  P. Allen,et al.  The psychological refractory period: evidence for age differences in attentional time-sharing. , 1998, Psychology and aging.

[3]  F. Craik,et al.  The handbook of aging and cognition , 1992 .

[4]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[5]  H. Müller,et al.  Age- and practice-related influences on dual-task costs and compensation mechanisms under optimal conditions of dual-task performance , 2012, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[6]  A. Hartley,et al.  Ideomotor-compatible tasks partially escape dual-task interference in both young and elderly adults. , 2015, Psychology and aging.

[7]  Paul Verhaeghen,et al.  Age-related differences in control processes in verbal and visuospatial working memory: storage, transformation, supervision, and coordination. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[8]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Can practice eliminate the psychological refractory period effect , 1999 .

[9]  J. de Houwer,et al.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis. , 2006, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[11]  John F. Larish,et al.  Training for attentional control in dual task settings: A comparison of young and old adults , 1995 .

[12]  D E Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. , 1997, Psychological review.

[13]  Jeremy W. Grabbe,et al.  Visual word recognition without central attention: evidence for greater automaticity with advancing age. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[14]  David E. Kieras,et al.  A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. , 1997 .

[15]  E. Hazeltine,et al.  Investigating perfect timesharing: the relationship between IM-compatible tasks and dual-task performance. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  François Maquestiaux,et al.  Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[17]  Li-Shan Chou,et al.  Does inability to allocate attention contribute to balance constraints during gait in older adults? , 2008, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[18]  R. Engle Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[19]  A. Hartley,et al.  Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to response-generation processes. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[20]  P. Allen,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for adult age-related sparing and decrements in emotion perception and attention , 2012, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[21]  D E Kieras,et al.  Aging and the psychological refractory period: task-coordination strategies in young and old adults. , 2000, Psychology and aging.

[22]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[23]  Jeremy W. Grabbe,et al.  Visual word recognition without central attention: Evidence for greater automaticity with greater reading ability , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Catherine Thevenot,et al.  The use of procedural knowledge in simple addition and subtraction problems , 2012, Cognition.

[25]  Lost ability to automatize task performance in old age , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  A. Hartley,et al.  Age-related differences and similarities in dual-task interference. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Mei-Ching Lien,et al.  Age differences in overlapping-task performance: evidence for efficient parallel processing in older adults. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[28]  J. Cerella,et al.  Aging and dual-task performance: a meta-analysis. , 2003, Psychology and aging.

[29]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Testing the Limits of Optimizing Dual-Task Performance in Younger and Older Adults , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  C. Hertzog,et al.  Age differences in strategic behavior during a computation-based skill acquisition task. , 2009, Psychology and aging.

[31]  François Maquestiaux La simultanéité des actes psychiques : apports du protocole PRP , 2012 .

[32]  J. Cerella Information processing rates in the elderly. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  E. Ruthruff,et al.  Learning to bypass the central bottleneck: declining automaticity with advancing age. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[34]  Motonori Yamaguchi,et al.  Pushing typists back on the learning curve: revealing chunking in skilled typewriting. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Pierre Barrouillet,et al.  On the problem-size effect in small additions: Can we really discard any counting-based account? , 2013, Cognition.

[36]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Ning Liu,et al.  A novel, variable angle guide grid for neuronal activity studies , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[39]  Eliot Hazeltine,et al.  Simultaneous dual-task performance reveals parallel response selection after practice. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Aging and input processing in dual-task situations. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[41]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time constraints and resource sharing in adults' working memory spans. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  F. Craik,et al.  Effects of aging and task difficulty on divided attention performance. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  T. Salthouse The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[44]  François Maquestiaux,et al.  Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults. , 2007, Psychology and aging.

[45]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  How does practice reduce dual-task interference: Integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening? , 2006, Psychological research.

[46]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Why practice reduces dual-task interference. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.