Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: from concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption

Multitasking in user behavior can be represented along a continuum in terms of the time spent on one task before switching to another. In this paper, we present a theory of behavior along the multitasking continuum, from concurrent tasks with rapid switching to sequential tasks with longer time between switching. Our theory unifies several theoretical effects - the ACT-R cognitive architecture, the threaded cognition theory of concurrent multitasking, and the memory-for-goals theory of interruption and resumption - to better understand and predict multitasking behavior. We outline the theory and discuss how it accounts for numerous phenomena in the recent empirical literature.

[1]  C. W. Telford.  The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[2]  A. Newell.  Unified Theories of Cognition , 1990 .

[3]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  The Vertical Visual Field and Implications for the Head-Up Display , 1992 .

[4]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[6]  C. Lebiere,et al.  An integrated theory of list memory. , 1998 .

[7]  Bonnie E. John,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Modeling Idiom: An Examination of Three Models of the Wickens's Task , 1998 .

[8]  Randolph M. Jones,et al.  Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation , 1998, AI Mag..

[9]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Instant Messaging: Effects of Relevance and Timing , 2000 .

[10]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Effects of instant messaging interruptions on computing tasks , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[11]  Jennifer M. Glass,et al.  Virtually Perfect Time Sharing in Dual-Task Performance: Uncorking the Central Cognitive Bottleneck , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  Dario D. Salvucci.  Predicting the effects of in-car interface use on driver performance: an integrated model approach , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[14]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Memory for goals: an activation-based model , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[16]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  Production Compilation: A Simple Mechanism to Model Complex Skill Acquisition , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Jacob P. Somervell,et al.  A model for notification systems evaluation—assessing user goals for multitasking activity , 2003, TCHI.

[18]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[19]  S. Monsell.  Task-set reconfiguration processes do not imply a control homunuculus: Reply to Altmann , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Christopher G. Atkeson,et al.  Predicting human interruptibility with sensors: a Wizard of Oz feasibility study , 2003, CHI '03.

[21]  S. Monsell.  Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  James Fogarty,et al.  Examining the robustness of sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility , 2004, CHI.

[23]  Christopher A. Monk,et al.  Recovering From Interruptions: Implications for Driver Distraction Research , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[24]  John R Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of the mind. , 2004, Psychological review.

[25]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution , 2004, CHI.

[26]  Víctor M. González,et al.  "Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness": managing multiple working spheres , 2004, CHI.

[27]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[28]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Towards an index of opportunity: understanding changes in mental workload during task execution , 2004, CHI.

[29]  James Fogarty,et al.  Examining task engagement in sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility , 2005, CHI.

[30]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Balancing Awareness and Interruption: Investigation of Notification Deferral Policies , 2005, User Modeling.

[31]  Dario D. Salvucci.  A Multitasking General Executive for Compound Continuous Tasks , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  Richard L. Lewis,et al.  An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Human Symbol Manipulation Within an Integrated Cognitive Architecture , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption , 2006, CHI.

[35]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Control of Cognition , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[36]  Jelmer P. Borst,et al.  The Costs of Multitasking in Threaded Cognition , 2007 .

[37]  Frank E. Ritter,et al.  The Rise of Cognitive Architectures , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[38]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: field study, analysis, and directions , 2007, CHI.

[39]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Timecourse of recovery from task interruption: Data and a model , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  John R. Anderson.  How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[41]  John Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning. , 2007, Psychological review.

[42]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  Understanding changes in mental workload during execution of goal-directed tasks and its application for interruption management , 2008, TCHI.

[43]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Threaded cognition: an integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. , 2008, Psychological review.

[44]  Dario D. Salvucci,et al.  Effects of Memory Rehearsal on Driver Performance: Experiment and Theoretical Account , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[45]  N. Taatgen,et al.  Too much control can hurt: A threaded cognition model of the attentional blink , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  A. Stocco,et al.  Testing fMRI predictions of a Cognitive Model of the Problem State Multitasking Bottleneck , 2010 .