Implicit attentional biases in a changing environment.

The current study investigates whether statistical regularities that change over time affect attentional selection. While searching for a target singleton, the distractor singleton was presented much more often in one location than in all other locations. Crucially, the location that had a distractor much more often, changed to new locations during the course of the experiment. Here we established exactly how the bias of attention followed these changes in the display. Unlike previous studies, we show that selection was remarkably flexible as the attentional bias followed the changes in the environment incorporating contributions of previous contingencies to the current attentional bias. Importantly, the initial learning experience had a lingering and enduring effect on subsequent attentional biases. We argue that the weights within the spatial priority map of selection are adjusted to changing environments, even though observers are unaware of these changes in the environment.

[1]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual Selection: Usually Fast and Automatic; Seldom Slow and Volitional , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[3]  R. Aslin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .

[4]  Hermann J Müller,et al.  Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors , 2018, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[5]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses , 2009, Psychological science.

[6]  Leonardo Chelazzi,et al.  Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering , 2017, Cortex.

[7]  Hui Chen,et al.  Amnesia for Object Attributes , 2015, Psychological science.

[8]  M. Chun,et al.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Nicholas Gaspelin,et al.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[11]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[14]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[15]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[16]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  of Experimental Psychology : Learning , Memory , and Cognition , 2019 .

[17]  J. Theeuwes Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  E Tulving,et al.  Priming and human memory systems. , 1990, Science.

[19]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[20]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[21]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return revisited: Localized inhibition on top of a pervasive bias , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Investigating implicit statistical learning mechanisms through contextual cueing , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Yuhong V Jiang,et al.  Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Tal Makovski,et al.  Contextual cost: When a visual-search target is not where it should be , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[28]  Angela A. Manginelli,et al.  Misleading contextual cues: How do they affect visual search? , 2009, Psychological research.

[29]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[30]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[32]  J. Pratt,et al.  The Spatial Distribution of Inhibition of Return , 2001, Psychological science.

[33]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Attentional cartography: mapping the distribution of attention across time and space , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[35]  C. Lustig,et al.  Implicit memory is not immune to interference. , 2001 .

[36]  Brett Bahle,et al.  Feature-Based Statistical Regularities of Distractors Modulate Attentional Capture , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search , 2019, bioRxiv.

[40]  M. Chun,et al.  Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .

[41]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[42]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Markus Conci,et al.  Long-term adaptation to change in implicit contextual learning , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[45]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities bias overt attention , 2019, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[46]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Altering Spatial Priority Maps via Reward-Based Learning , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  Michel F. Failing,et al.  Nonspatial attentional capture by previously rewarded scene semantics , 2015 .

[48]  E. Newport,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .

[49]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Hermann J Müller,et al.  Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition? , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[53]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  B. Scholl,et al.  The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[55]  Heinrich René Liesefeld,et al.  Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.