On the issues related to compliance of LF pulsed exposures with safety standards and guidelines

In this paper, procedures to determine compliance of low-frequency pulsed exposures are investigated. Current methods specified by international standards or guidelines (e.g., from the ICNIRP or IEEE) are recognized to be conservative in order to account for uncertainties coming from the assessment procedures. In this way, protection of workers and the general public should be guaranteed. However, overly conservative procedures could hinder the application of technologies employing complex, intermittent, or pulsed waveforms without improving safety. Besides over conservatism, variabilities among the results of several procedures are examined for the first time. These limits pose several concerns on the applicability of the existing compliance formulae. A more stable technique, which is still easy to implement, is therefore proposed.

[1]  John G R Jefferys,et al.  A NEUROBIOLOGICAL BASIS FOR ELF GUIDELINES , 2007, Health physics.

[2]  D. Attwell,et al.  Interaction of low frequency electric fields with the nervous system: the retina as a model system. , 2003, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[3]  J. Herbertz Comment on the ICNIRP guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998, Health physics.

[4]  Norbert Leitgeb,et al.  Assessment of multiple frequency ELF electric and magnetic field exposure , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Measurement and analysis of electromagnetic fields of pulsed magnetic field therapy systems for private use. , 2011, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[6]  T. Shigemitsu,et al.  Equivalent dipole moment method to characterize magnetic fields generated by electric appliances: extension to intermediate frequencies of up to 100 kHz , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[7]  K. Jokela,et al.  Computational dosimetry of induced electric fields during realistic movements in the vicinity of a 3 T MRI scanner. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Steven D. Chandler Radioactive waste policy and legislation: 50 years on from the 1960 Act , 2011, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[9]  A. Huxley,et al.  The action potential in the myelinated nerve fibre of Xenopus laevis as computed on the basis of voltage clamp data , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  K Jokela,et al.  Restricting exposure to pulsed and broadband magnetic fields. , 2000, Health physics.

[11]  Reilly Jp Comments concerning "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)". , 1999 .

[12]  Hannah Heinrich,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF NON-SINUSOIDAL, PULSED, OR INTERMITTENT EXPOSURE TO LOW FREQUENCY ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELDS , 2007, Health physics.

[13]  P. Å. Öberg,et al.  Magnetophosphenes: a quantitative analysis of thresholds , 1980, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[15]  K. Jokela,et al.  ICNIRP Guidelines GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME-VARYING , 1998 .