Integrating succession and community assembly perspectives

Succession and community assembly research overlap in many respects, such as through their focus on how ecological processes like dispersal, environmental filters, and biotic interactions influence community structure. Indeed, many recent advances have been made by successional studies that draw on modern analytical techniques introduced by contemporary community assembly studies. However, community assembly studies generally lack a temporal perspective, both on how the forces structuring communities might change over time and on how historical contingency (e.g. priority effects and legacy effects) and complex transitions (e.g. threshold effects) might alter community trajectories. We believe a full understanding of the complex interacting processes that shape community dynamics across large temporal scales can best be achieved by combining concepts, tools, and study systems into an integrated conceptual framework that draws upon both succession and community assembly theory.

[1]  D. Wardle,et al.  Changes in coexistence mechanisms along a long‐term soil chronosequence revealed by functional trait diversity , 2012 .

[2]  J. Magnuson,et al.  Threads of Continuity There are immense differences between even-aged silvicultural disturbances (especially clearcutting) and natural disturbances, such as windthrow, wildfire, and even volcanic eruptions. , 2000 .

[3]  S. K. Schmidt,et al.  Do bacterial and fungal communities assemble differently during primary succession? , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[4]  Cynthia C. Chang,et al.  Multiple assessments of succession rates on Mount St. Helens , 2014, Plant Ecology.

[5]  R. Moral.  The Importance of Long-Term Studies of Ecosystem Reassembly after the Eruption of the Kasatochi Island Volcano , 2010 .

[6]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[7]  G. Mittelbach,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary perspectives on community assembly. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  Linghao Li,et al.  Environmental changes affect the assembly of soil bacterial community primarily by mediating stochastic processes , 2016, Global change biology.

[9]  Christopher J. Lortie,et al.  Refining the stress‐gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities , 2009 .

[10]  R. Aerts,et al.  Succession‐induced trait shifts across a wide range of NW European ecosystems are driven by light and modulated by initial abiotic conditions , 2012 .

[11]  J. Ogden,et al.  Priority Effects in the Recruitment of Juvenile Coral Reef Fishes , 1983 .

[12]  David L. Erickson,et al.  Change in community phylogenetic structure during tropical forest succession: evidence from New Guinea , 2012 .

[13]  R. del Moral,et al.  The role of refugia and dispersal in primary succession on Mount St. Helens, Washington , 2003 .

[14]  S. Pickett,et al.  Changing perspectives in community dynamics: A theory of successional forces. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  S. Pickett,et al.  Is successional research nearing its climax? New approaches for understanding dynamic communities , 2015 .

[16]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Intra- and interspecific plant-soil interactions, soil legacies and priority effects during old-field succession , 2011 .

[17]  Roger del Moral,et al.  Species attributes in early primary succession on volcanoes , 1995 .

[18]  C. Beierkuhnlein,et al.  Stochastic trajectories of succession initiated by extreme climatic events. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[19]  D. Wardle,et al.  Plant succession as an integrator of contrasting ecological time scales. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Katharine N. Suding,et al.  Inferring community assembly mechanisms from functional diversity patterns: the importance of multiple assembly processes , 2012 .

[21]  J. Bishop.  EARLY PRIMARY SUCCESSION ON MOUNT ST. HELENS: IMPACT OF INSECT HERBIVORES ON COLONIZING LUPINES , 2002 .

[22]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Mechanisms of Primary Succession Following Deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska , 1994 .

[23]  R. Moral,et al.  Colonizing plants on the Pumice Plains, Mount St. Helens, Washington , 1988 .

[24]  M. Mayfield,et al.  Opposing effects of competitive exclusion on the phylogenetic structure of communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[25]  R. Moral,et al.  Proximity, Microsites, and Biotic Interactions During Early Succession , 2005 .

[26]  Paul Kardol,et al.  Resource availability mediates the importance of priority effects in plant community assembly and ecosystem function , 2013 .

[27]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Trait Evolution, Community Assembly, and the Phylogenetic Structure of Ecological Communities , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[28]  R. J. Pool,et al.  Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 1917 .

[29]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Environmental filtering explains variation in plant diversity along resource gradients , 2014, Science.

[30]  Henry Chandler Cowles,et al.  The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan [Continued] , 1899, Botanical Gazette.

[31]  T. Fukami.  Historical Contingency in Community Assembly: Integrating Niches, Species Pools, and Priority Effects , 2015 .

[32]  L. Walker,et al.  Primary Succession and Ecosystem Rehabilitation: References , 2003 .

[33]  Paul A. Keddy,et al.  Assembly rules, null models, and trait dispersion : new questions from old patterns , 1995 .

[34]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  N. Swenson,et al.  Functional beta‐diversity patterns reveal deterministic community assembly processes in eastern North American trees , 2013 .

[36]  M. Uriarte,et al.  Trait-mediated assembly processes predict successional changes in community diversity of tropical forests , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J. Halvorson,et al.  Decomposition of lupine biomass by soil microorganisms in developing mount St. Helens' pyroclastic soils , 1995 .

[38]  Richard J Hobbs,et al.  Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[39]  Roger del Moral,et al.  Increasing deterministic control of primary succession on Mount St. Helens, Washington , 2009 .

[40]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Community assembly on isolated islands: macroecology meets evolution , 2016 .

[41]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochasticity, succession, and environmental perturbations in a fluidic ecosystem , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  D. Ackerly,et al.  A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[43]  J. HilleRisLambers,et al.  Rethinking Community Assembly through the Lens of Coexistence Theory , 2012 .

[44]  Susan G. Letcher.  Phylogenetic structure of angiosperm communities during tropical forest succession , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[45]  T. Fukami,et al.  Assembly history dictates ecosystem functioning: evidence from wood decomposer communities. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[46]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Community assembly along a soil depth gradient: contrasting patterns of plant trait convergence and divergence in a Mediterranean rangeland , 2012 .

[47]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites , 2011 .

[48]  J. Connell,et al.  Mechanisms of Succession in Natural Communities and Their Role in Community Stability and Organization , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[49]  D. Tilman,et al.  Dynamic and static views of succession: Testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[50]  P. Legendre,et al.  A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. , 2010, Ecology.

[51]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Ecological Filters, Thresholds, and Gradients in Resistance to Ecosystem Reassembly , 2004 .

[52]  D. Ackerly.  Community Assembly, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptive Evolution in Changing Environments , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[53]  P. Petraitis,et al.  Experimental confirmation of multiple community states in a marine ecosystem , 2009, Oecologia.

[54]  Nathan J B Kraft,et al.  Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor , 2015 .

[55]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Floating plant dominance as a stable state , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[56]  S. Pickett,et al.  Models, mechanisms and pathways of succession , 1987, The Botanical Review.

[57]  F. Bongers,et al.  Changing drivers of species dominance during tropical forest succession , 2014 .

[58]  D. Sikes,et al.  Biological Legacies: Direct Early Ecosystem Recovery and Food Web Reorganization after a Volcanic Eruption in Alaska , 2013 .

[59]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Diversity of plant nutrient-acquisition strategies increases during long-term ecosystem development , 2015, Nature Plants.

[60]  Barbara C. Schmid,et al.  Contrasting changes in taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity during a long‐term succession: insights into assembly processes , 2013 .

[61]  K. Anderson.  Temporal Patterns in Rates of Community Change during Succession , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[62]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  NATURAL DISTURBANCES AND DIRECTIONAL REPLACEMENT OF SPECIES , 2003 .

[63]  Roger del Moral,et al.  Primary succession trajectories on pumice at Mount St. Helens, Washington , 2012 .

[64]  Robert J. Pabst,et al.  Testing predictions of forest succession using long‐term measurements: 100 yrs of observations in the Oregon Cascades , 2015 .

[65]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Phylogenies and Community Ecology , 2002 .

[66]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Foliar nutrient concentrations and resorption efficiency in plants of contrasting nutrient‐acquisition strategies along a 2‐million‐year dune chronosequence , 2014 .

[67]  D. Richardson,et al.  Historical legacies accumulate to shape future biodiversity in an era of rapid global change , 2015 .

[68]  Lin Jiang,et al.  Species colonisation, not competitive exclusion, drives community overdispersion over long-term succession. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[69]  L. Walker,et al.  Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities , 1997 .

[70]  S. Levin,et al.  The Global Extent and Determinants of Savanna and Forest as Alternative Biome States , 2011, Science.

[71]  James A. Drake,et al.  The mechanics of community assembly and succession , 1990 .

[72]  Jonathan M. Chase.  Community assembly: when should history matter? , 2003, Oecologia.

[73]  M. Cadotte,et al.  The effects of phylogenetic relatedness on invasion success and impact: deconstructing Darwin's naturalisation conundrum. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[74]  Charles B. Halpern,et al.  Plant succession in areas of scorched and blown-down forest after the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington , 1990 .

[75]  Eric Garnier,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION , 2004 .

[76]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Functional traits and environmental filtering drive community assembly in a species-rich tropical system. , 2010, Ecology.

[77]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Phylogenetic community structure during succession: Evidence from three Neotropical forest sites , 2012 .