Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality

Symmetry and masculinity in human faces have been proposed to be cues to the quality of the owner. Accordingly, symmetry is generally found attractive in male and female faces, and femininity is attractive in female faces. Women's preferences for male facial masculinity vary in ways that may maximize genetic benefits to women's offspring. Here we examine same- and opposite-sex preferences for both traits (Study 1) and intercorrelations between preferences for symmetry and sexual dimorphism in faces (Study 1 and Study 2) using computer-manipulated faces. For symmetry, we found that male and female judges preferred symmetric faces more when judging faces of the opposite-sex than when judging same-sex faces. A similar pattern was seen for sexual dimorphism (i.e., women preferred more masculine male faces than men did), but women also showed stronger preferences for femininity in female faces than men reported. This suggests that women are more concerned with female femininity than are men. We also found that in women, preferences for symmetry were positively correlated with preferences for masculinity in male faces and that in men preferences for symmetry were positively correlated with preferences for femininity in female faces. These latter findings suggest that symmetry and sexual dimorphism advertise a common quality in faces or that preferences for these facial cues are dependent on a common quality in the judges. Collectively, our findings support the view that preferences for symmetry and sexual dimorphism are related to mechanisms involved in sexual selection and mate choice rather than functionless by-products of other perceptual mechanisms. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  L. Mealey,et al.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Bernard Tiddeman,et al.  Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[5]  D. Perrett,et al.  Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder. , 2002 .

[6]  R. Johnstone Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition , 1994, Nature.

[7]  Magnus Enquist,et al.  Symmetry, beauty and evolution , 1994, Nature.

[8]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial masculinity and fluctuating asymmetry , 2003 .

[9]  Rufus A. Johnstone,et al.  Generalization and the evolution of symmetry preferences , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  J. Manning,et al.  Symmetry and Performance in Middle Distance Runners , 1998, International journal of sports medicine.

[12]  D I Perrett,et al.  Extracting Prototypical Facial Images from Exemplars , 1993, Perception.

[13]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[14]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. Fisher,et al.  Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  A. Little,et al.  Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Are human preferences for facial symmetry focused on signals of developmental instability , 2004 .

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. , 1999 .

[19]  G. Jasienska,et al.  Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[21]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[22]  D. Perrett,et al.  Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women , 2006 .

[24]  D. Enlow Handbook of facial growth , 1975 .

[25]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[26]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Doug Jones,et al.  Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations , 1993, Human nature.

[28]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Attractiveness of Facial Averageness and Symmetry in Non-Western Cultures: In Search of Biologically Based Standards of Beauty , 2001, Perception.

[29]  D. Perrett,et al.  Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  S. Ghirlanda,et al.  Chickens prefer beautiful humans , 2002, Human nature.

[31]  D. Singh,et al.  Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  P. Hancock,et al.  The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[33]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness–symmetry relationship , 2001 .

[34]  M. Enquist,et al.  Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses , 1993, Nature.

[35]  D. Perrett,et al.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference , 1999, Nature.

[36]  D. Perrett,et al.  Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness , 1998, Nature.

[37]  M. Enquist,et al.  Experimental evidence of receiver bias for symmetry , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  A. Mazur,et al.  Facial Dominance in Homo Sapiens as Honest Signaling of Male Quality , 1997 .

[39]  G. Jasienska,et al.  Symmetrical women have higher potential fertility , 2006 .

[40]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[42]  D. Berry,et al.  Some components and consequences of a babyface. , 1985 .

[43]  M. Cunningham Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty , 1986 .

[44]  Ernst Gombrich,et al.  The Sense of Order: A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art , 1979 .