Video super-resolution using controlled subpixel detector shifts

Video cameras must produce images at a reasonable frame-rate and with a reasonable depth of field. These requirements impose fundamental physical limits on the spatial resolution of the image detector. As a result, current cameras produce videos with a very low resolution. The resolution of videos can be computationally enhanced by moving the camera and applying super-resolution reconstruction algorithms. However, a moving camera introduces motion blur, which limits super-resolution quality. We analyze this effect and derive a theoretical result showing that motion blur has a substantial degrading effect on the performance of super-resolution. The conclusion is that, in order to achieve the highest resolution motion blur should be avoided. Motion blur can be minimized by sampling the space-time volume of the video in a specific manner. We have developed a novel camera, called the "jitter camera," that achieves this sampling. By applying an adaptive super-resolution algorithm to the video produced by the jitter camera, we show that resolution can be notably enhanced for stationary or slowly moving objects, while it is improved slightly or left unchanged for objects with fast and complex motions. The end result is a video that has a significantly higher resolution than the captured one.

[1]  Wesley E. Snyder,et al.  Demosaicking methods for Bayer color arrays , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Shmuel Peleg,et al.  Restoration of multiple images with motion blur in different directions , 2000, Proceedings Fifth IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision.

[3]  P. Anandan,et al.  Hierarchical Model-Based Motion Estimation , 1992, ECCV.

[4]  Harry Shum,et al.  Fundamental limits of reconstruction-based superresolution algorithms under local translation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Yaron Caspi,et al.  Increasing Space-Time Resolution in Video , 2002, ECCV.

[6]  Terrance E. Boult,et al.  Efficient super-resolution via image warping , 2000, Image Vis. Comput..

[7]  Eero P. Simoncelli Modeling the joint statistics of images in the wavelet domain , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[8]  Pavel Pudlák,et al.  A note on the use of determinant for proving lower bounds on the size of linear circuits , 2000, Inf. Process. Lett..

[9]  Physik Instrumente,et al.  M-111 Micro Translation Stage , 2005 .

[10]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Data-driven multichannel superresolution with application to video sequences , 1999 .

[11]  Robert L. Stevenson,et al.  Extraction of high-resolution frames from video sequences , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Motion Deblurring and Super-resolution from an Image Sequence , 1996, ECCV.

[13]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Limits on super-resolution and how to break them , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[14]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Robust regression methods for computer vision: A review , 1991, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[15]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Super-resolution enhancement of text image sequences , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[16]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  Superresolution video reconstruction with arbitrary sampling lattices and nonzero aperture time , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[17]  Michal Irani,et al.  Improving resolution by image registration , 1991, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[18]  Michael Elad,et al.  Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..