Abet Outcomes Via Project Based Service Learning Attributes: Assessment Via Successful Intelligence

Project-based service learning (PBSL) is an amalgamation of two types of pedagogical methods: problem-based learning (PBL) and service learning (SL). The dynamic interplay between the two methods creates a synergistic pedagogy that is stronger than either one alone. While the collaborative nature intrinsic to problem-based learning engenders development of technical (classroom-learned concepts) and professional skills (teamwork, communication, leadership, diversity), the service learning aspects allows students to gain knowledge of societal, cultural, economic, and environmental impacts of their solutions. ABET-based educational outcomes require degree programs to provide technical and professional skills while acknowledging and addressing societal and global issues in the impacts of engineering work. While technical skills can be routinely measured, the issue of providing quantitative measures of professional skills is more challenging and lacks a reliable precedent. So, how can one effectively quantify the attributes provided by PBSL to show how they satisfy the non-technical attributes of ABET educational outcomes? This paper discusses how the attributes associated with PBSL can be mapped to the desired outcomes of ABET-accredited programs and how these attributes can be measured. First, an overview of PBSL and its attributes are described and connected to the desired, ABET educational outcomes. Then, a possible assessment methodology, based on Sternberg’s triarchic theory of human cognition, is introduced as a possible theoretical basis for quantitative measurement of PBSL attributes. A case study performed at Tufts University, is presented that illustrates how this evaluation process, based on the triarchic theory, leads to quantifiable measures of technical and professional skills.

[1]  D. Kolb Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[2]  Robert V. Brill,et al.  Statistics in Plain English , 2003, Technometrics.

[3]  null null,et al.  Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century , 2008 .

[4]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[5]  Daniel Ling,et al.  The Mechanisms of Perception , 1969 .

[6]  Lisa R. Lattuca,et al.  Quality Assurance of Engineering Education through Accreditation: The Impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and Its Global Influence , 2005 .

[7]  L. Vygotsky Interaction between learning and development , 1978 .

[8]  Kerrissa Heffernan,et al.  Service-Learning in Higher Education , 2001 .

[9]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Self-awareness : its nature and development , 1998 .

[10]  Chris Swan,et al.  Enhancing Engineering Education: Learning To Solve Problems Through Service Learning Projects , 2008 .

[11]  Xxyyzz,et al.  Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century : Preparing the Civil Engineer for the Future , 2004 .

[12]  Beverly Davis The Recognition Of And Increasing Value Of Professional Engineering Skills , 2004 .

[13]  L. A. Hausman How we Think , 1921 .

[14]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Experience and Education. , 1974 .

[15]  John T. Tester,et al.  Assessing individual performance within a team using peer evaluations , 2004 .

[16]  Edward A. Zlotkowski Successful Service-Learning Programs. New Models of Excellence in Higher Education. , 2000 .

[17]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Successful Intelligence: How Practical and Creative Intelligence Determine Success in Life , 1996 .

[18]  Peter Suedfeld,et al.  Personality theory and information processing , 1971 .

[19]  Dan W. Butin,et al.  Service-learning in higher education : critical issues and directions , 2005 .

[20]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  The Development of Scientific Concepts in Childhood. , 1962 .