Modeling User Training and Support for Information Technology Implementations: A Bayesian Test of Competing Models

Information technology implementations continue to be significant endeavors for both research and practice. Although prior studies have extensively examined user training and user support, a consensus is lacking on their conceptualizations. Prior research has argued for direct, as well as indirect, effects of user training and user support on perceived benefits while appealing to different theoretical perspectives. This study clarifies the roles of user training and user support in information technology implementations using data on 302 software implementations. Using a Bayesian model comparison strategy, the authors found that the effects of user training and user support on perceived benefits are mediated by individuals' perceptions regarding the characteristics of the information technologies. These findings suggest that user training and user support should be treated as enablers in process of implementing information technologies.

[1]  Barbara Vanin.  Online Catalogue of Manuscripts Conserved in Libraries in the Veneto Region , 2009 .

[2]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User Information Systems Acceptance, Training, and Effectiveness , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Paul N. Finlay,et al.  Perceptions of the Benefits From the Introduction of CASE: An Empirical Study , 1994, MIS Q..

[5]  D. H. Drury,et al.  Temporal Analysis of Information Technology Chargeback Systems , 1998 .

[6]  Neal G. Shaw.  Capturing the Technological Dimensions of IT Infrastructure Change: A Model and Empirical Evidence , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Neal G. Shaw.  Strategies for Managing Computer Software Upgrades , 2000 .

[8]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[9]  Antonio Cartelli,et al.  Encyclopedia of Information Communication Technology , 2008 .

[10]  James C. Brancheau,et al.  Adoption and Utilization of Commercial Software Packages: Exploring Utilization Equilibria, Transitions, Triggers, and Tracks , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  An empirical investigation of ODSS impact on individuals and organizations , 2000, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Dorian Birsan,et al.  On Plug-ins and Extensible Architectures , 2005, ACM Queue.

[13]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Training End Users: An Exploratory Study , 1987, MIS Q..

[14]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[15]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Comparison of end-user computing characteristics in the U.S., Israel and Taiwan , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Jing Zhang,et al.  MACROS: Case Study of Knowledge Sharing System Development within New York State Government Agencies , 2005, J. Cases Inf. Technol..

[17]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  A Genre-Based Method for Information Systems Planning , 2001, Information Modeling in the New Millennium.

[18]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[19]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An empirical investigation on factors affecting the acceptance of CASE by systems developers , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[20]  William R. King,et al.  The Development of a Measure for End-User Computing Support , 1994 .

[21]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction , 1982 .

[22]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action , 1986 .

[24]  R. Bagozzi.  An Examination Of The Validity Of Two Models Of Attitude. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[25]  Mehdi Khosrow-Pour,et al.  Printed at: , 2011 .

[26]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[27]  Wesley S. Shu,et al.  Will the New Economy Emerge as Information Technology Pays Off? , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Information System Success: Individual and Organizational Determinants , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial (with comments by M. Clyde, David Draper and E. I. George, and a rejoinder by the authors , 1999 .

[30]  A. F. Salam,et al.  An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[31]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[32]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Factors affecting perceptions of CASE effectiveness , 1995 .

[33]  L. Phillips.  Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[34]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Critical Number Policies for Inventory Models with Periodic Data , 1989 .

[35]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[36]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Social influence and end-user training , 1995, CACM.

[37]  Tan Yigitcanlar,et al.  Information and Communication Technology for E-Regions , 2009 .

[38]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[39]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test , 1993 .

[40]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Does Information Technology Training Really Matter? A Social Information Processing Analysis of Coworkers' Influence on IT Usage in the Workplace , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Jens Mende.  Data Flow Diagram Use to Plan Empirical Research Projects , 2009 .

[42]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[43]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Susan K. Lippert,et al.  Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[45]  Frances Wickham Lee,et al.  Life After a Disastrous Electronic Medical Record Implementation: One Clinic’s Experience , 2001 .

[46]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Bayesian Model Selection in Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[47]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[48]  Mehdi Khosrowpour.  Cases on information technology : lessons learned , 2006 .

[49]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Differences in end-user computing support and control across user departments , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[50]  Deborah A. Cronau.  Pitfalls and Triumphs of Information Technology Management , 2001 .

[51]  Surya B. Yadav,et al.  The transparent evolution of information technology infrastructure components , 1999 .

[52]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[53]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[54]  Calin Gurau.  Managing the Integrated Online Marketing Communication , 2009 .

[55]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[56]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[57]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[58]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model , 1990 .

[59]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[60]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..