Visualizing perceived spatial data quality of 3D objects within virtual globes

Virtual globes (VGs) allow Internet users to view geographic data of heterogeneous quality created by other users. This article presents a new approach for collecting and visualizing information about the perceived quality of 3D data in VGs. It aims at improving users' awareness of the quality of 3D objects. Instead of relying on the existing metadata or on formal accuracy assessments that are often impossible in practice, we propose a crowd-sourced quality recommender system based on the five-star visualization method successful in other types of Web applications. Four alternative five-star visualizations were implemented in a Google Earth-based prototype and tested through a formal user evaluation. These tests helped identifying the most effective method for a 3D environment. Results indicate that while most websites use a visualization approach that shows a ‘number of stars’, this method was the least preferred by participants. Instead, participants ranked the ‘number within a star’ method highest as it allowed reducing the visual clutter in urban settings, suggesting that 3D environments such as VGs require different design approaches than 2D or non-geographic applications. Results also confirmed that expert and non-expert users in geographic data share similar preferences for the most and least preferred visualization methods.

[1]  S. Lang,et al.  ANALYTICAL 3D VIEWS AND VIRTUAL GLOBES – PUTTING ANALYTICAL RESULTS INTO SPATIAL CONTEXT , 2007 .

[2]  P. Agouris,et al.  VISUALIZATION OF IMAGE QUALITY IN DISTRIBUTED SPATIAL DATABASES , 2004 .

[3]  Huadong Guo,et al.  Digital Earth 2020: towards the vision for the next decade , 2012, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[4]  Lorenz Hurni,et al.  Proposed Cartographic Design Principles for 3D Maps: A Contribution to an Extended Cartographic Theory , 2008, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[5]  Han Zhang,et al.  Determinants of online merchant rating: Content analysis of consumer comments about Yahoo merchants , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Igor Drecki,et al.  Visualisation of Uncertainty in Geographical Data , 2002 .

[7]  M. Haklay How Good is Volunteered Geographical Information? A Comparative Study of OpenStreetMap and Ordnance Survey Datasets , 2010 .

[8]  Dirk Tiede,et al.  Analytical 3D views and virtual globes - scientific results in a familiar spatial context , 2010 .

[9]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Defining a Digital Earth System , 2008, Trans. GIS.

[10]  Torre Zuk,et al.  Visualizing uncertainty , 2008 .

[11]  Olaf Schroth,et al.  Tool or Toy? Virtual Globes in Landscape Planning , 2011, Future Internet.

[12]  W. Mackaness,et al.  Visual access to data quality in geographic information systems , 1993 .

[13]  Shilad Sen,et al.  Rating: how difficult is it? , 2011, RecSys '11.

[14]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Visualizing Geospatial Information Uncertainty: What We Know and What We Need to Know , 2005 .

[15]  Michael F. Goodchild Spatial Accuracy 2.0 , 2008 .

[16]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Digital Earth Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier Crowdsourcing Geographic Information for Disaster Response: a Research Frontier , 2022 .

[17]  Wolfgang Kresse,et al.  ISO Standards for Geographic Information , 2010 .

[18]  B. Buttenfield Representing Data Quality , 1993 .

[19]  R. Devillers,et al.  Multidimensional Management of Geospatial Data Quality Information for its Dynamic Use Within GIS , 2005 .

[20]  Yvan Bédard,et al.  SPATIAL DATA UNCERTAINTY IN THE VGI WORLD: GOING FROM CONSUMER TO PRODUCER , 2019 .

[21]  Terry Ryan,et al.  The Design and Evaluation of a Peer Ratings System for Online Learning Communities , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Alex Pang,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty in Geospatial Data , 2001 .

[23]  Bin Gu,et al.  Do online reviews matter? - An empirical investigation of panel data , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Gondy Leroy,et al.  Designing User Studies in Informatics , 2011 .

[25]  R. Devillers,et al.  TOWARDS MANAGING THE RISKS OF DATA MISUSE FOR SPATIAL DATACUBES , 2007 .

[26]  Christoph Schlieder,et al.  Wisdom about the Crowd: Assuring Geospatial Data Quality Collected in Location-Based Games , 2011, ICEC.

[27]  Simon Harding,et al.  Visually representing geo-temporal differences , 2010, 2010 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[28]  Alfred Stein,et al.  Thirty Years of Research on Spatial Data Quality: Achievements, Failures, and Opportunities , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[29]  Terry A. Slocum Thematic Cartography and Geographic Visualization , 2004 .

[30]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  The use cases of digital earth , 2008, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[31]  Michael T. Jones,et al.  T the Five W's Where Is Where? Google's Geospatial Organizing Principle____________ Visualization Viewpoints Editor's Note , 2022 .

[32]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Using Metadata to Link Uncertainty and Data Quality Assessments , 2006 .

[33]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Testing Popular Visualization Techniques for Representing Model Uncertainty , 2003 .

[34]  Sophie Ahrens,et al.  Recommender Systems , 2012 .

[35]  THINK GLOBAL,et al.  Think global , 2006, Nature.

[36]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Communicating uncertainty in spatial databases , 1996, Trans. GIS.

[37]  Petr Cizek,et al.  The ethics of Google Earth: crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualisation. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[38]  Robert Jeansoulin,et al.  Spatial Data Quality: Concepts , 2010 .

[39]  Guillaume Touya,et al.  Quality Assessment of the French OpenStreetMap Dataset , 2010, Trans. GIS.

[40]  Stephen R.J. Sheppard,et al.  Guidance for crystal ball gazers: developing a code of ethics for landscape visualization , 2001 .

[41]  Michael Peter Presentation and Evaluation of Inconsistencies in Multiply Represented 3D Building Models , 2009, QuaCon.

[42]  Arzu Çöltekin,et al.  THE EFFECT OF REALISM ON THE CONFIDENCE IN SPATIAL DATA QUALITY IN STEREOSCOPIC 3D DISPLAYS , 2009 .

[43]  Soo-Min Kim,et al.  Automatically Assessing Review Helpfulness , 2006, EMNLP.

[44]  C. Peter Keller,et al.  Modelling and visualizing multiple spatial uncertainties , 1997 .

[45]  Alex Pang,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty in Geo-spatial Data , 2001 .

[46]  David Schuff,et al.  What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com , 2010 .