Bridging the gap: attribute and spatial metaphors for tangible interface design

If tangible user interfaces (TUIs) are going to move out of research labs and into mainstream use they need to support tasks in abstract as well as spatial domains. Designers need guidelines for TUIs in these domains. Conceptual Metaphor Theory can be used to design the relations between physical objects and abstract representations. In this paper, we use physical attributes and spatial properties of objects as source domains for conceptual metaphors. We present an empirical study where twenty participants matched physical representations of image schemas to metaphorically paired adjectives. Based on our findings, we suggest twenty pairings that are easily identified, suggest groups of image schemas that can serve as source domains for a variety of metaphors, and provide guidelines for structuring physical-abstract mappings in abstract domains. These guidelines can help designers apply metaphor theory to design problems in abstract domains, resulting in effective interaction.

[1]  Dag Svanæs,et al.  In search of metaphors for tangible user intefaces , 2000, DARE '00.

[2]  J. Zlatev.  What's in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language , 2005 .

[3]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Gestural interfaces: a step backward in usability , 2010, INTR.

[4]  Jörn Hurtienne,et al.  Sad is heavy and happy is light: population stereotypes of tangible object attributes , 2009, TEI.

[5]  John M. Carroll,et al.  The Role of Metaphors in User Interface Design , 1997 .

[6]  Greg Corness,et al.  Springboard: Designing Image Schema Based Embodied Interaction for an Abstract Domain , 2011, Whole Body Interaction.

[7]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Bricks: laying the foundations for graspable user interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[8]  Vyvyan Evans,et al.  Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction , 2001 .

[9]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[10]  Greg Corness,et al.  Human-computer-intuition? Exploring the cognitive basis for intuition in embodied interaction , 2009, Int. J. Arts Technol..

[11]  N. Presmeg.  The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason , 1992 .

[12]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[13]  Jörn Hurtienne,et al.  Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: intuitive patterns for tangible interaction , 2007, TEI.

[14]  Dennis E. Egan,et al.  Handbook of Human Computer Interaction , 1988 .

[15]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  TEI goes on: Tangible and Embedded Interaction. , 2008 .

[16]  Jacob Buur,et al.  Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction , 2006, CHI.

[17]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Designing to support reasoned imagination through embodied metaphor , 2009, C&C '09.

[18]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Identifying embodied metaphors in children's sound-action mappings , 2009, IDC.