Understanding Social Dynamics: The Cellular Automata Approach

Social dynamics are one of the most interesting and at the same time least understood subjects. When we try to understand social dynamics a lot of difficulties come together. I will focus on those dynamics where we make a distinction between a micro level of individual behavior and a macro level with macro effects. A first problem is that there is no well accepted theoretical micro foundation of human behavior. Sometimes individuals are looking sideways and imitate more successful others. Sometimes individuals compare their past success with that of a reference group or person and depending on that comparison they change their behavior this way or that way. Sometimes individuals make decisions in a more anticipating way, considering own and others feasible strategies, the utilities assigned to the possible outcomes, and then trying to make the best out of a situation of strategic interdependence. A second problem is that even if we decide for a certain type of micro foundation, we do not know what the consequences under those assumptions will be since usually too many actors with too many interactions are involved. And even if we could overcome the lag in our deductive capacities, we are facing a third problem, namely how to get all the empirical data necessary to understand that dynamics we want to understand.

[1]  M. Nowak,et al.  THE SPATIAL DILEMMAS OF EVOLUTION , 1993 .

[2]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata , 1986 .

[3]  T. Schelling Models of Segregation , 1969 .

[4]  Thomas C. Schelling,et al.  Dynamic models of segregation , 1971 .

[5]  Oliver Kirchkamp,et al.  Spatial Evolution of Automata in the Prisoner's Dilemma , 2000, Social Science Microsimulation.

[6]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.

[7]  J. M. Sakoda The checkerboard model of social interaction , 1971 .

[8]  David M. Messick,et al.  Individual Heuristics and the Dynamics of Cooperation in Large Groups. , 1995 .

[9]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Dynamical Systems and Cellular Automata , 1985 .

[10]  B. Latané,et al.  From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact. , 1990 .

[11]  Hartmut Kliemt Simulation and Rational Practice , 1996 .

[12]  Donald C. Keenan,et al.  Competition, collusion, and chaos , 1993 .

[13]  Wulf Albers,et al.  Social dilemmas and cooperation , 1994 .

[14]  Klaus G. Troitzsch,et al.  Modelling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view , 1996 .

[15]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  Cellular automata machines - a new environment for modeling , 1987, MIT Press series in scientific computation.

[16]  Michael Taylor,et al.  Anarchy and cooperation , 1976 .

[17]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  Universality and complexity in cellular automata , 1983 .