Standards, dominant designs and preferential acquisition of complementary assets through slight information advantages

Abstract This paper discusses how firms can use slight information advantages to obtain preferential access to complementary assets and create multi-level dominant designs. It does this by using an analysis of several cellular phone industries and the literature on standards and dominant designs. In the most prominent case, the leading Japanese cellular service provider (NTT DoCoMo) offered preferential information about the “open” Japanese digital phone standard in return for preferential access to the lightest phones from four phone suppliers. These four phone suppliers used the preferential access to this information to obtain preferential cooperation from parts suppliers and to make better design tradeoffs between parts than the other phone suppliers. These superior design tradeoffs enabled the DoCoMo suppliers to create various dominant designs within the Personal Digital Cellular (PDC) standard. The creation of these dominant designs forced other phone and part manufacturers to change their design strategies and copy the designs used by the DoCoMo phone and part suppliers. The result is that DoCoMo and its four phone suppliers have substantially reversed the slides in their market shares. By comparing this case with several other cellular phone industries in which different modes of competition exist, the paper discusses how market conditions determine the way in which standards and dominant designs emerge.

[1]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Interaction of Design Hierarchies and market Concepts in Technological Evolution : Research Policy , 1985 .

[2]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Supplier involvement in automotive component design: are there really large US Japan differences? , 1996 .

[3]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network , 1995 .

[4]  Hiroyuki Itami,et al.  Interpenetration of organization and market : Japan's firm and market in comparison with the U.S , 1984 .

[5]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change , 1994 .

[6]  Jefrey L Funk Competition between regional standards and the success and failure of firms in the world-wide mobile communication market , 1998 .

[7]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[8]  Jeffrey H. Rohlfs A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service , 1974 .

[9]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[11]  K. Clark,et al.  Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction☆ , 1993 .

[12]  S. Oren,et al.  Critical Mass and Tariff Structure in Electronic Communications Markets , 1981 .

[13]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[14]  Jeffrey L. Funk,et al.  Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication , 2001 .

[15]  Jeffrey Lee Funk,et al.  The Mobile Internet: How Japan Dialled up and the West Disconnected , 2001 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[17]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[18]  George V. Thompson,et al.  Intercompany Technical Standardization in the Early American Automobile Industry , 1954, The Journal of Economic History.

[19]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[20]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[21]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[22]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[23]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[24]  Jeffrey L. Funk,et al.  Concurrent engineering and the underlying structure of the design problem , 1997 .

[25]  Jeffrey L. Funk Global Competition Between and Within Standards: The Case of Mobile Phones , 2001 .