Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness: An event-related potential study

Animation creates a vivid, virtual world and expands the scope of human imagination. In this study, we investigated the time-courses of brain responses related to the evaluation of the attractiveness of cartoon faces using the event-related potential (ERP) technique. The results demonstrated that N170 amplitude was higher for attractive than for unattractive cartoon faces in males, while the opposite was found in females. Facial attractiveness notably modulated the late positive component (LPC), which might reflect the task-related process of aesthetic appraisal of beauty. The mean LPC amplitude in males was significantly higher for attractive cartoon faces than for unattractive faces, while the LPC amplitude in females did not significantly differ between attractive and unattractive cartoon faces. Moreover, the paint mode (computer graphics, gouache, and stick figure) modulated the early encoding of facial structures and the late evaluative process. The early modulation effect by paint mode may be related to the spatial frequency of the pictures. The processing speed and intensity in females were both higher than those in males. In conclusion, our study, for the first time, reported ERP modulation based on the assessment of cartoon facial attractiveness, suggesting the facilitated selection of attractiveness information at the early stage, and that the attentional enhancement of attractive faces at the late stage only exists in males. This suggests that men’s brains are hard-wired to be sensitive to facial beauty, even in cartoons.

[1]  Michael Monsour,et al.  A new measure for assessing executive function across a wide age range: children and adults find happy-sad more difficult than day-night. , 2011, Developmental science.

[2]  C. Porcaro,et al.  Multimodal Functional Network Connectivity: An EEG-fMRI Fusion in Network Space , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  D. Perrett,et al.  Facial Skin Coloration Affects Perceived Health of Human Faces , 2009, International Journal of Primatology.

[5]  Werner Sommer,et al.  The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  S. Platek,et al.  Curvaceous female bodies activate neural reward centers in men , 2010, Communicative & integrative biology.

[7]  Amy L. Thomas,et al.  The neural response to facial attractiveness. , 2009, Neuropsychology.

[8]  S. Kojima,et al.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Faces and Non-Facial Objects: An ERP Study , 2008, The International journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Richard Russell,et al.  Beauty is in the ‘We’ of the Beholder: Greater Agreement on Facial Attractiveness among Close Relations , 2007, Perception.

[10]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Crossing the 'uncanny valley': adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. , 2010, Perception.

[11]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Facial beauty and the late positive component of event‐related potentials , 1997 .

[12]  C. Deruelle,et al.  Do children perceive features of real and cartoon faces in the same way? Evidence from typical development and autism , 2010, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[13]  Jinsheng Kang,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  M. Mason,et al.  The Look of Love , 2005, Psychological science.

[15]  Thomas Jacobsen,et al.  Electrophysiological indices of processing aesthetics: Spontaneous or intentional processes? , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[16]  K. Nakayama,et al.  RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN FUSIFORM FACE AREA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[17]  C. Senior,et al.  Beauty in the Brain of the Beholder , 2003, Neuron.

[18]  Liu Zuxiang,et al.  Neural Mechanism of Spatial Frequency Representation in Face Categorization: an ECoG Study , 2010 .

[19]  M. Viggiano,et al.  When memory meets beauty: Insights from event-related potentials , 2010, Biological Psychology.

[20]  Sandra J. E. Langeslag,et al.  Event-related potential responses to love-related facial stimuli , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[21]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Stepwise emergence of the face-sensitive N170 event-related potential component , 2003, Neuroreport.

[22]  Jonas K. Olofsson,et al.  Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[23]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Watching cartoons activates the medial prefrontal cortex in children , 2007 .

[24]  C. C. Maldonado,et al.  A pictorial sleepiness scale based on cartoon faces. , 2004, Sleep.

[25]  M. van vugt,et al.  The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. , 2011, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[26]  Piotr Jaśkowski,et al.  Facing facts: neuronal mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[27]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (approximately 160 ms) within the fusiform gyri. , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  H. Halit,et al.  Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? , 2006, Brain Research.

[29]  Shigekazu Ishihara,et al.  Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness? , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[30]  Pamela M. Pallett,et al.  New “golden” ratios for facial beauty , 2010, Vision Research.

[31]  Dezhong Yao,et al.  fMRI functional networks for EEG source imaging , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[32]  Yue-Jia Luo,et al.  The Time Course of the Influence of Valence and Arousal on the Implicit Processing of Affective Pictures , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  A. Proverbio,et al.  Gender differences in hemispheric asymmetry for face processing , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[34]  Yue-jia Luo,et al.  The time course of implicit processing of erotic pictures: An event-related potential study , 2011, Brain Research.

[35]  Paul J. Whalen,et al.  Are Attractive People Rewarding? Sex Differences in the Neural Substrates of Facial Attractiveness , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Affective Judgments of Faces Modulate Early Activity (∼160 ms) within the Fusiform Gyri , 2002, NeuroImage.

[37]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Identifying cognitive preferences for attractive female faces: An event‐related potential experiment using a study‐test paradigm , 2011, Journal of neuroscience research.

[38]  W. Sommer,et al.  Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[39]  K. Kościński Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences , 2007 .

[40]  Y. Lan,et al.  Introduction to Carbon , 2012 .