The rise and fall of product innovation strategy : a simulation model

The benefits of a strategically balanced product portfolio, as a key driver of long-term business success, are well documented. In this respect, many firms have been unable to achieve a balanced product portfolio. An important cause is the failure to develop dynamic capabilities, that is, the capabilities to reconfigure internal and external competences to address dynamic business environments. In times of environmental instability and financial decay, top managers are facing difficulties in adapting their strategy to changes in market and competitive conditions. Firms can thus become seriously trapped in a reinforcing negative loop, where the changing environment is counteracted with inadequate strategic actions, which in turn results in further decreasing financial performance. This so-called suppression mechanism serves to explain why so many firms fail at building dynamic capabilities. We draw on system dynamics modeling to build and simulate a model of the causes, consequences, and potential solutions of the suppression mechanism. This model is derived from the literature on dynamic capability and, more broadly, strategy and innovation studies. The main contribution of this paper to the literature on dynamic capabilities is the definition and codification of the suppression mechanism.

[1]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[2]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[3]  Tarek K Abdel-Hamid,et al.  The experience trap. , 2008, Harvard business review.

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[5]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Strategy implementation: An experience in learning , 1989 .

[6]  M L Tushman,et al.  Building ambidextrous organizations. Forming your own "skunk works". , 1999, Health Forum journal.

[7]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[8]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Developing Theory Through Simulation Methods , 2006 .

[9]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[10]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[11]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[12]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[13]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[14]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities , 2003 .

[15]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Modeling innovation, manufacturing, diffusion and adoption/rejection processes , 2005 .

[16]  William E. Souder,et al.  Context and Antecedents of Information Utility at the R&D/Marketing Interface , 1996 .

[17]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .

[18]  Steffen Bayer,et al.  Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world , 2004 .

[19]  M. Tushman,et al.  Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator's Dilemma , 2007 .

[20]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  The satisficing principle in capability learning , 2000 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[22]  D. Leonard-Barton CORE CAPABILITIES AND CORE RIGIDITIES: A PARADOX IN MANAGING NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 1992 .

[23]  Stylianos Kavadias,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Managing the New Product Development Portfolio: When and How to Use Strategic Buckets , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[24]  Garry D. Bruton,et al.  STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION , 2011 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[26]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[27]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. , 1990 .

[28]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[29]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .

[30]  Kim Warren,et al.  Competitive Strategy Dynamics , 2002 .

[31]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .