A machine-learning approach for damage detection in aircraft structures using self-powered sensor data

This study proposes a novel strategy for damage identification in aircraft structures. The strategy was evaluated based on the simulation of the binary data generated from self-powered wireless sensors employing a pulse switching architecture. The energy-aware pulse switching communication protocol uses single pulses instead of multi-bit packets for information delivery resulting in discrete binary data. A system employing this energy-efficient technology requires dealing with time-delayed binary data due to the management of power budgets for sensing and communication. This paper presents an intelligent machine-learning framework based on combination of the low-rank matrix decomposition and pattern recognition (PR) methods. Further, data fusion is employed as part of the machine-learning framework to take into account the effect of data time delay on its interpretation. Simulated time-delayed binary data from self-powered sensors was used to determine damage indicator variables. Performance and accuracy of the damage detection strategy was examined and tested for the case of an aircraft horizontal stabilizer. Damage states were simulated on a finite element model by reducing stiffness in a region of the stabilizer’s skin. The proposed strategy shows satisfactory performance to identify the presence and location of the damage, even with noisy and incomplete data. It is concluded that PR is a promising machine-learning algorithm for damage detection for time-delayed binary data from novel self-powered wireless sensors.

[1]  Hoon Sohn,et al.  A Review of Structural Health Review of Structural Health Monitoring Literature 1996-2001. , 2002 .

[2]  Yuchun Lee,et al.  Handwritten Digit Recognition Using K Nearest-Neighbor, Radial-Basis Function, and Backpropagation Neural Networks , 1991, Neural Computation.

[3]  Yan Shi,et al.  Towards packet-less ultrasonic sensor networks for energy-harvesting structures , 2017, Computer Communications.

[4]  Bo Dong,et al.  A pulse switching paradigm for ultra low power cellular sensor networks , 2014, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[5]  Shantanu Chakrabartty,et al.  Structural Assessment and Damage Identification Algorithms Using Binary Data , 2015 .

[6]  Alex Elvin,et al.  Feasibility of structural monitoring with vibration powered sensors , 2006 .

[7]  Trevor J. Hastie,et al.  Matrix completion and low-rank SVD via fast alternating least squares , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Energy Harvesting for Structural Health Monitoring Sensor Networks , 2008 .

[10]  Dimitrios D. Vergados,et al.  A survey on power control issues in wireless sensor networks , 2007, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[11]  Shantanu Chakrabartty,et al.  Calibration and Characterization of Self-Powered Floating-Gate Usage Monitor With Single Electron per Second Operational Limit , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers.

[12]  Jeongyeup Paek,et al.  A wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: performance and experience , 2005, The Second IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors, 2005. EmNetS-II..