Quantitative plaque features from coronary computed tomography angiography to identify regional ischemia by myocardial perfusion imaging

Aims We aimed to investigate whether quantitative plaque features measured from coronary CT angiography (CCTA) predict ischemia by myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging (MPI). Methods and Results Hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients (63% males) with suspected-coronary artery disease, undergoing hybrid CCTA, and attenuation corrected solid state 99mTc stress/rest MPI and single vessel ischemia were considered. Quantitative analysis of CCTA derived non-calcified plaque (NCP), low-density NCP [< 30 Hounsfield Units (HU)] (LDNCP), calcified and total plaque burdens (%, normalized to vessel volume), maximum diameter stenosis and contrast density difference (CD, maximum difference in HU/lumen area within lesion). Normal thresholds for plaque features were defined as 95th percentile thresholds, from 40% of vessels with non-ischemic MPI regions. These vessels were excluded from further analysis. Regional ischemia (≥ 2%) was quantified from MPI. All plaque features were higher in arteries corresponding to ischemia (P < 0.003 for all). In multi-variable analysis, abnormal NCP burden [odds ratio (OR) 2.6], LDNCP burden (OR 3.9), and CD (OR 2.7) were significantly associated with ischemia, whereas stenosis ≥ 50% was not (P = 0.14). In a subset of vessels with ≥ 50% stenosis, LDNCP burden (OR 4.3, P = 0.008) and CD (OR 3.7, P = 0.029) were associated with ischemia. In subsets of vessels with stenosis 30-69% and ≥ 70%, abnormal LDNCP burden (OR 6.4, P = 0.006) and CD (OR 7.3, P = 0.02) were associated with ischemia. Conclusions Quantitative plaque features obtained from CCTA, LDNCP, and CD, are associated with ischemia by MPI independent of stenosis. LDNCP burden and CD are associated with ischemia in stenosis 30-69% and ≥ 70%, respectively.

[1]  I. Burger,et al.  Validation of a new contrast material protocol adapted to body surface area for optimized low-dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering , 2010, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[2]  T. Callister,et al.  SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[3]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparison of the Short‐Term Survival Benefit Associated With Revascularization Compared With Medical Therapy in Patients With No Prior Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography , 2003, Circulation.

[4]  Alexander Broersen,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography: Does It Predict Functionally Significant Coronary Stenoses? , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  H. Bøtker,et al.  Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions , 2016, European heart journal.

[7]  D. Berman,et al.  Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[8]  G. Hillis,et al.  64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2008, Heart.

[9]  V. Treyer,et al.  Validation of CT Attenuation Correction for High-Speed Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Using a Novel Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Detector Technique , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  D. Dey,et al.  Non-invasive prediction of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenoses by contrast density difference in coronary CT angiography. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[12]  D. Berman,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by CT angiography identify coronary lesions that cause ischemia: a direct comparison to fractional flow reserve. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[13]  Valerie Treyer,et al.  Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with a Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride Detector Technique: Optimized Protocol for Scan Time Reduction , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated three-dimensional quantification of noncalcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography: comparison with intravascular US. , 2010, Radiology.

[15]  P. Serruys,et al.  Gender and the extent of coronary atherosclerosis, plaque composition, and clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  D. Dey,et al.  Vulnerable plaque features on coronary CT angiography as markers of inducible regional myocardial hypoperfusion from severe coronary artery stenoses. , 2011, Atherosclerosis.

[17]  V. Fuster,et al.  Histopathologic characteristics of atherosclerotic coronary disease and implications of the findings for the invasive and noninvasive detection of vulnerable plaques. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  V. Treyer,et al.  Ultrafast nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging on a new gamma camera with semiconductor detector technique: first clinical validation , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  Tianxi Cai,et al.  Iodinated Contrast Opacification Gradients in Normal Coronary Arteries Imaged With Prospectively ECG-Gated Single Heart Beat 320-Detector Row Computed Tomography , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated Quantitative Plaque Burden from Coronary CT Angiography Noninvasively Predicts Hemodynamic Significance by using Fractional Flow Reserve in Intermediate Coronary Lesions. , 2015, Radiology.

[21]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[22]  D. Spevack,et al.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computerized tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Damini Dey,et al.  Automated 3-dimensional quantification of noncalcified and calcified coronary plaque from coronary CT angiography. , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[24]  B. Gersh,et al.  Angiographic Versus Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Stenoses in the FAME Study: Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation , 2011 .

[25]  Hirofumi Anno,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[26]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[27]  M. Pencina,et al.  Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models. , 2012, American journal of epidemiology.