Exploring the Interplay Between Standard Products and Customer Specific Solutions

This thesis deals with how a company may handle the interplay between the development of standard products and customer specific solutions. There are three aims of the thesis. The first aim concerns how a buyer and a supplier in interaction arrive at a solution involving a mix of standard and customer specific product features. The second aim concerns how the supplier can manage the balance between exploitation of standard products and exploration of new product features during the development of a particular solution. The third aim concerns how the development of specific solutions affects the development of the standard product. The frame of reference is primarily based on the Industrial Network Approach, and deals with utilization and development of products within networks of interdependent resources. While resource utilisation is seen as dependent on how the resources are embedded into the network, resource development takes place when their features are changed in order to make the resources fit into new combinations. The thesis is based on a case study focusing on a Swedish ERP-system provider's development of new product features. The main part of the case deals with the company's development of a customer specific solution in interaction with one particular buyer whose requirements could not be met by existing product features. The buyer is a subcontractor on the second tier in the automotive industry and implemented the ERP-system in order to improve the coordination of certain sequentially dependent operations. To understand how the products have developed over time, a series of preceding and subsequent customer interactions and their influence on the use and development of the product features is also part of the case. The thesis concludes that when developing specific customer solutions the supplier must exploit on existing resource features while adjusting to the customers' particular resource constellations. Likewise, the customer needs to maintain most of its resource constellation while adjusting some parts of it to the new resource. Different strategies that a supplier and a buyer may apply in order to deal with the effects that a certain change may have on other parts of the resource network are suggested. Furthermore, it is concluded that a company, in order to balance between exploration and exploitation, needs to manage three interrelated aspects of resource embeddedness. First, it needs to economise on existing product features when developing customer specific solutions. Second, the company needs to identify similarities among different customer specific solutions when developing the standard product. Third, it needs to deal with a large number of interdependent interfaces, both within the product itself and towards different customer solutions. Finally, it is concluded that separating the issue of efficiently developing customer solutions, and the issue of developing standard product features, into different organisational units may benefit the balancing between exploration and exploitation.

[1]  Elsebeth Holmen,et al.  A paradox? Homogeneity in the IMP perspective , 2003 .

[2]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  Managing Technological Development , 2002 .

[3]  Jyf Wynstra,et al.  Purchasing involvement in product development , 1998 .

[4]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization , 1997 .

[5]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[6]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Technical development in networks. The importance of third parties , 2011 .

[7]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[8]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[9]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[10]  P. Bourdieu The Logic of Practice , 1990 .

[11]  Mikael Hård,et al.  Technology as Practice: Local and Global Closure Processes in Diesel-Engine Design , 1994 .

[12]  C. Floyd A Systematic Look at Prototyping , 1984 .

[13]  Espen Gressetvold,et al.  Product Development - Effects on a Company's Network of Relationships , 2004 .

[14]  Martin Johanson,et al.  Value Creation in Industrial Networks , 2000 .

[15]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[16]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[17]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[18]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[19]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Dyadic Business Relationships within a Business Network Context , 1994 .

[20]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[21]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[22]  Sol Levine,et al.  Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships , 1961 .

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  J. Fox,et al.  No Business is an Island , 2017 .

[25]  H. Demsetz,et al.  Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization , 1975, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[26]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Resources, Firms, and Strategies: A Reader in the Resource-Based Perspective , 1997 .

[27]  Torkel Wedin,et al.  Networks and Demand. The Use of Electricity in an Industrial Process , 2001 .

[28]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[29]  James A. Narus,et al.  Business Market Management: Understanding, Creating, and Delivering Value (Управление бизнес-рынками: понимание, создание и донесение ценности) , 1998 .

[30]  Ivan Snehota,et al.  Notes on a Theory of Business Enterprise , 1990 .

[31]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[32]  K. Cook,et al.  Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks , 1978 .

[33]  Ian Alexander Managing Industrial Knowledge; Creation, Transfer and Utilization , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Supply Network Strategies , 2001 .

[35]  Jens Laage-Hellman,et al.  Technological Development in Industrial Networks , 1989 .

[36]  H. Håkansson,et al.  Developing relationships in business networks , 1995 .

[37]  Anders Lundgren,et al.  Technological Innovation and Network Evolution , 1995 .

[38]  Karl Habermeier,et al.  Product use and product improvement , 1990 .

[39]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on Technology. , 1978 .

[40]  H. Håkansson International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach , 1982 .

[41]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[42]  H. Håkansson,et al.  A Model of Industrial Networks , 1992 .

[43]  B. Loasby Knowledge, institutions, and evolution in economics , 1999 .

[44]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[45]  H Hkansson,et al.  The Burden Of Relationships Or Who's Next , 1995 .

[46]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  Supporting Active User Involvement in Prototyping , 1990, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Richard N. Langlois,et al.  Firms, Markets and Economic Change: A dynamic Theory of Business Institutions , 1995 .

[48]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[49]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[50]  Lennart Bångens,et al.  Inter-Firm Linkages and Learning. An Empirical Exploration of Firms in the Third World , 1998 .

[51]  Israel M. Kirzner Competition and Entrepreneurship , 1973 .

[52]  H Hkansson,et al.  Path-Dependence: Restricting Or Facilitating Technical Development? , 2002 .

[53]  Thomas Ritter A Framework for Analyzing Interconnectedness of Relationships , 2000 .

[54]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research , 2002 .

[55]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[56]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  Framväxten av en ny mekanisk massateknik : en utvecklingshistoria , 1990 .

[57]  Resource Development and Interaction - The Function of Partial Connections , 2002 .

[58]  J. Mahoney Path dependence in historical sociology , 2000 .

[59]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  System sourcing—opportunities and problems , 2002 .

[60]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[61]  Frida Wennerström,et al.  Projects and the interplay between ends and means - A case study of an inter-organisational research project , 2004 .

[62]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Industrial technological development : a network approach , 1987 .

[63]  K. Weick FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[64]  Guohua Bai Embryonic approach to the development of information systems , 1997, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[65]  David Ford,et al.  How Do Companies Interact , 1986 .

[66]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[67]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[68]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[69]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[70]  Geoff Easton,et al.  Temporally embedded case comparison in industrial marketing research , 2004 .

[71]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[72]  Lars Magnusson,et al.  Evolutionary economics and path-dependence , 1997 .

[73]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Technical Communication in R & D Laboratories: The Impact of Project Work Characteristics , 1978 .

[74]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[75]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[76]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[77]  Mats Magnusson Innovation and Efficiency - A Knowledge-Based Approach to Organizing Industrial Firms , 2000 .

[78]  R. Garud,et al.  Path dependence and creation , 2003 .

[79]  L. Araujo,et al.  Research methods in industrial marketing studies , 2004 .

[80]  Fredrik Von Corswant,et al.  ORGANIZING INTERACTIVE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT , 2004 .

[81]  James Joyce,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977, Medical History.

[82]  David T. Wilson,et al.  Managing Business Relationships , 1998 .

[83]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[84]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[85]  Håkan Håkansson,et al.  Corporate Technological Behaviour: Co-Operation and Networks , 1989 .

[86]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .

[87]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The multiple boundaries of the firm , 2003 .

[88]  Ronnie Ramlogan,et al.  Institutions and Progress , 2001 .

[89]  Anna Dubois,et al.  Organising Industrial Activities - An analytical framework , 1994 .

[90]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[91]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  Managing Interfaces with Suppliers , 1999 .

[92]  Jan-Åke Törnroos,et al.  The role of embeddedness in the evolution of business networks , 1998 .

[93]  M. Denscombe The Good Research Guide: for small-scale social research projects , 1998 .

[94]  A. Stinchcombe Constructing Social Theories , 1970 .

[95]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[96]  Aino Halinen,et al.  Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks , 2005 .

[97]  Magnar Forbord,et al.  New uses of an agricultural product?: A case study of development in an industrial network , 2003 .

[98]  Anirudh Dhebar Complementarity, compatibility, and product change: Breaking with the past? , 1995 .

[99]  Geoffrey Easton,et al.  Methodology and Industrial Networks , 1995 .

[100]  Christiane Floyd,et al.  Outline of a Paradigm Change in Software Engineering , 1993 .

[101]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[102]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[103]  P. David Clio and the Economics of QWERTY , 1985 .

[104]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizing Knowledge , 1998 .

[105]  George J. Stigler,et al.  The Organization of Industry , 1969 .

[106]  K. Blois,et al.  Vertical Quasi-Integration , 1972 .

[107]  E. Holmen,et al.  Strategizing through analyzing and influencing the network horizon , 2003 .

[108]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[109]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[110]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[111]  A. Griffin,et al.  PDMA Success Measurement Project: Recommended Measures for Product Development Success and Failure , 1996 .