Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: An eye movement analysis

Readers’ eye movements were monitored as they read sentences containing lexically ambiguous words whose meanings share a single syntactic category (e.g.,calf), lexically ambiguous words whose meanings belong to different syntactic categories (e.g.,duck), or unambiguous control words. Information provided prior to the target always unambiguously specified the context-appropriate syntactic-category assignment for the target. Fixation times were longer on ambiguous words whose meanings share a single syntactic category than on controls, both when prior context was semantically consistent with the subordinate interpretation of a biased ambiguous word (Experiment 1) and when prior context was semantically neutral as to the intended interpretation of a balanced ambiguous word (Experiment 2). These ambiguity effects, which resulted from differences in difficulty with meaning resolution, were not found when the ambiguity crossed syntactic categories. These data indicate that, in the absence of syntactic ambiguity, syntactic-category information mediates the semantic-resolution process.

[1]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. , 1979 .

[2]  D. Swinney Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[3]  Marie Bienkowski,et al.  Automatic access of the meanings of ambiguous words in context: Some limitations of knowledge-based processing , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  W. Nelson Francis,et al.  FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .

[5]  R. E. Morrison,et al.  Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: evidence for parallel programming of saccades. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Syntactic Context and Lexical Access , 1984 .

[7]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[8]  Curt Burgess,et al.  Activation and selection processes in the recognition of ambiguous words. , 1985 .

[9]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and children's word recognition. , 1986 .

[10]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[11]  K. Rayner,et al.  Resolution of syntactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexically ambiguous sentences☆ , 1987 .

[12]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[13]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Interaction with context during human sentence processing , 1988, Cognition.

[14]  P. Tabossi Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts , 1988 .

[15]  Greg B. Simpson,et al.  Dynamic Contextual Processes and Lexical Access , 1989 .

[16]  K. Rayner,et al.  Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  P. O'Seaghdha The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  Paul Gorrell,et al.  Establishing the loci of serial and parallel effects in syntactic processing , 1989 .

[19]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Chapter 7 Comprehension Processes in Reading Ambiguous Sentences: Reflections from Eye Movements , 1991 .

[21]  Gregory B. Simpson,et al.  Understanding word and sentence , 1991 .

[22]  M. A. Britt,et al.  Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits , 1992 .

[23]  K. Rayner,et al.  The Effect of Meaning Frequency on Processing Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence from Eye Fixations , 1992 .

[24]  Stephen Dopkins,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1992 .

[25]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[26]  M. MacDonald The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity , 1993 .

[27]  Julie E. Boland The role of verb argument structure in sentence processing: Distinguishing between syntactic and semantic effects , 1993, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.

[28]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[29]  Susan A. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1994 .

[30]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[31]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[32]  Lorraine K. Tyler,et al.  Loss of Semantic Memory: Implications for the Modularity of Mind , 1994 .

[33]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Refer-ential context and syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[34]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[35]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Multiple lexical codes in reading: Evidence from eye movements, naming time, and oral reading. , 1995 .

[36]  L. Tyler,et al.  Dissociations of lexical function: Semantics, syntax, and morphology , 1995 .

[37]  Julie E. Boland Resolving Syntactic Category Ambiguities in Discourse Context: Probabilistic and Discourse Constraints☆ , 1997 .

[38]  J. Segui,et al.  Syntactic and semantic processing in schizophrenic patients evaluated by lexical-decision tasks. , 1997, Neuropsychology.

[39]  P G O'Seaghdha Conjoint and dissociable effects of syntactic and semantic context. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  G. Kellas,et al.  Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Katherine S. Binder,et al.  Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading , 1998 .

[42]  Kim Ainsworth-Darnell,et al.  Dissociating Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials , 1998 .

[43]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Dynamical models of sentence processing , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[44]  E. Saffran,et al.  Sentence processing in the face of semantic loss: a case study. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[46]  Orna Peleg,et al.  Salience and Context Effects: Two Are Better Than One , 2001 .

[47]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  What happens to the unselected meaning of an ambiguous word in skilled reading , 2001 .

[48]  Brenda C Rapp,et al.  Handbook of Cognitive Neuropsychology: What Deficits Reveal About the Human Mind , 2001 .