Minimally invasive treatment of displaced femoral shaft fractures with a teleoperated robot-assisted surgical system.

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgical operation of intramedullary (IM) nailing is a standard technique for treating diaphyseal fractures. However, in addition to its advantages, there are some drawbacks such as the frequent occurrence of malalignment, physical fatigue and high radiation exposure to medical staff. The use of robotic and navigation techniques is promising treatments for femoral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS This paper presents a novel robot-assisted manipulator for femoral shaft fracture reduction with indirect contact with the femur. An alternative clinical testing model was proposed for orthopedic surgeons to practice femoral fracture reduction. This model imitates the human musculoskeletal system in shape and functional performance. The rubber tube simulate muscles providing contraction forces, and the silicone simulates passive elasticity of muscles. Two-group experiments were performed for studying feasibility of the teleoperated manipulator. RESULTS The average operative time was about 7min. In the first group experiments, the femur axial, antero-posterior (AP) and lateral views mean errors were 2.2mm, 0.7mm and 1.1mm, respectively, and their maximums were 3.0mm, 0.9mm and 1.5mm; the mean errors of rotation were 0.8° around x-axis, 1.6° around y-axis, 2.0° around z-axis, and their maximums were 1.1°, 2.2°, 2.9°, respectively. For the second group experiments, the femur axial, AP and lateral views mean errors were 1.8mm, 0.4mm and 0.8mm, respectively, and their maximums were 2.2mm, 0.7mm and 1.1mm; the mean errors of rotation were 1.2° around x-axis, 1.6° around y-axis, 1.9° around z-axis, and their maximums were 2.4°, 1.8°, 2.7°, respectively. Reduction for AP view displacement is easier than lateral (p<0.05) because of the tube-shaped anatomy and the muscle contraction forces. Errors around x-axis are smaller than those around y-, and z- axes (p<0.05), i.e., electro-mechanical actuator is easier to control than pneumatic. CONCLUSION An experimental model for simulating human femoral characteristics was proposed. Experiments conducted on the artificial lower limb model demonstrated high reduction accuracy, safety, sufficient working space, and low radiation exposure of the proposed robot-assisted system. Thus, the minimally invasive teleoperated manipulator would have greater development prospect.

[1]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Robot‐assisted fracture reduction using three‐dimensional intraoperative fracture visualization: An experimental study on human cadaver femora , 2010, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  Yonghua Chen,et al.  A Simple and Novel Hybrid Robotic System for Robot-Assisted Femur Fracture Reduction , 2012, Adv. Robotics.

[3]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Robot-assisted Long Bone Fracture Reduction , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[5]  Yingze Zhang,et al.  Displaced femoral shaft fractures treated by antegrade nailing with the assistance of an intramedullary reduction device , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  Christian Krettek,et al.  Overdistraction of the fracture eases reduction in delayed femoral nailing: results of intraoperative force measurements. , 2006, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  Application of 3D printed customized external fixator in fracture reduction. , 2015, Injury.

[8]  Seong Young Ko,et al.  6-DOF force feedback control of robot-assisted bone fracture reduction system using double F/T sensors and adjustable admittances to protect bones against damage , 2016 .

[9]  C. Horstman,et al.  Biological osteosynthesis versus traditional anatomic reconstruction of 20 long-bone fractures using an interlocking nail: 1994-2001. , 2004, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[10]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  A novel combination of computer-assisted reduction technique and three dimensional printed patient-specific external fixator for treatment of tibial fractures , 2016, International Orthopaedics.

[11]  Tianmiao Wang,et al.  Advancing computer‐assisted orthopaedic surgery using a hexapod device for closed diaphyseal fracture reduction , 2015, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[12]  Daniel Kendoff,et al.  A rat model for evaluating physiological responses to femoral shaft fracture reduction using a surgical robot , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  N Weinrich,et al.  A hexapod robot external fixator for computer assisted fracture reduction and deformity correction , 2004, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[14]  Sanghyun Joung,et al.  Development of femoral bone fracture model simulating muscular contraction force by pneumatic rubber actuator , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[15]  Junqiang Wang,et al.  Femoral fracture reduction with a parallel manipulator robot on a traction table , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[16]  H. Lin,et al.  Parallel Manipulator Robot assisted Femoral Fracture Reduction on Traction Table , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[17]  H. Zhan,et al.  Open vs. closed reduction combined with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in humeral fractures , 2016, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[18]  Ju-Hong Lee,et al.  Clinical comparison between open plating and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for displaced proximal humeral fractures: A prospective randomized controlled trial. , 2017, Injury.

[19]  Tianmiao Wang,et al.  A visual servo-based teleoperation robot system for closed diaphyseal fracture reduction , 2015, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[20]  Mamoru Mitsuishi,et al.  Robot-assisted femoral fracture reduction: Preliminary study in patients and healthy volunteers , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[21]  Michael Nerlich,et al.  Reduction of femoral shaft fractures in vitro by a new developed reduction robot system 'RepoRobo'. , 2004, Injury.

[22]  C Krettek,et al.  A surgical telemanipulator for femur shaft fracture reduction , 2006, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[23]  J. Widmaier,et al.  Techniques of obtaining and maintaining reduction during nailing of femur fractures. , 2009, Orthopedics.

[24]  Musa Citak,et al.  Assessment of the accuracy of infrared and electromagnetic navigation using an industrial robot: Which factors are influencing the accuracy of navigation? , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[25]  Sheng Quan Xie,et al.  Design of a Parallel Long Bone Fracture Reduction Robot with Planning Treatment Tool , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[26]  C. Krettek,et al.  Repetitive reduction lead to significant elevated IL-6 and decreased IL-10 levels in femoral osteotomies: A quantitative analysis of a robot-assisted reduction process in a rat model. , 2016, Injury.