EVALUATING SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS BY N–LINEAR RANKING MODEL

Ranking has been applied in many domains using recommendation systems such as search engine, e-commerce, and so on. We will introduce and study N-linear mutual ranking, which can rank n classes of objects at once. The ranking scores of these classes are dependent to the others. For instance, PageRank by Google is a 2-linear ranking model, which ranks the web-pages and links at once. Particularly, we focus to N star ranking model and demonstrate it in ranking conference and journal problems. We have conducted the experiments for the proposed models to classical ones. The experiments are based on the DBLP dataset, which contains more than one million papers, authors and thousands of conferences and journals in computer science. The experimental results show that N -star ranking model evaluates everything much more detail based on the context of their relationships.

[1]  Michael Ley,et al.  DBLP - Some Lessons Learned , 2009, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[2]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars' Journal Basket Via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? , 2013, MIS Q..

[3]  Bill Ravens,et al.  An Introduction to Copulas , 2000, Technometrics.

[4]  Jason J. Jung,et al.  A General Model for Mutual Ranking Systems , 2014, ACIIDS.

[5]  Mercy Paul Selvan,et al.  Survey on Web Page Ranking Algorithms , 2012 .

[6]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  Graph-based algorithms for ranking researchers: not all swans are white! , 2012, Scientometrics.

[8]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Link mining: a survey , 2005, SKDD.

[9]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[10]  Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Quantum Navigation and Ranking in Complex Networks , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Patrick Reuther,et al.  Maintaining an Online Bibliographical Database: The Problem of Data Quality , 2006, EGC.

[12]  Wm. R. Wright General Intelligence, Objectively Determined and Measured. , 1905 .

[13]  Wei-Ying Ma,et al.  Object-level ranking: bringing order to Web objects , 2005, WWW '05.

[14]  M. Kendall A NEW MEASURE OF RANK CORRELATION , 1938 .

[15]  Dilip Kumar Sharma,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Web Page Ranking Algorithms , 2010 .

[16]  James P. Keener,et al.  The Perron-Frobenius Theorem and the Ranking of Football Teams , 1993, SIAM Rev..

[17]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  Ranking-based clustering of heterogeneous information networks with star network schema , 2009, KDD.

[18]  Yizhou Sun,et al.  RankClus: integrating clustering with ranking for heterogeneous information network analysis , 2009, EDBT '09.

[19]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[20]  Trung Kien,et al.  MPageRank: The Stability of Web Graph , 2009 .

[21]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Bibliometrics and beyond: some thoughts on web-based citation analysis , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..