Nonlinear Effects of Weather on Crop Yields: Implications for Climate Change

We estimate the relationship between weather and corn, soybean, and cotton yields using a unique flne-scale data set of daily weather records spanning the entire United States from 1950-2004. Our dataset incorporates the distribution of temperatures between the minimum and maximum within each day and across all days in the growing season. We flnd a robust and signiflcant nonlinear relationship between temperature and yields, which increase linearly in temperature until about 29 ‐ C for corn and soybeans and 33 ‐ C for cotton. However, higher temperatures quickly become very harmful. This sharp nonlinearity implies that studies using average temperatures give a biased estimates of the average impact of temperatures. The estimated relationship between yield and temperature is stable over time and location. Although technological change has increased average yields, it has not increased relative heat tolerance. These flndings suggest there may be limited potential for technological adaptation of plants to changes in climate. The stability of the estimated relationship across regions and crops further suggests that the results may be transferable to other parts of the world. We use the estimated relationship to predict efiects of the latest warming scenarios on crop yields. The predicted impacts are large and signiflcant across speciflcations and predict reductions in yields of 72-80% for the three crops under the most rapid warming scenario in our preferred model speciflcation.

[1]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Climate change and the global harvest , 1998 .

[2]  Michael Greenstone,et al.  The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather , 2007 .

[3]  John W. Wade,et al.  Stochastic trend, weather and US corn yield variability , 1992 .

[4]  R. Darwin,et al.  A FARMer's View of the Ricardian Approach to Measuring Agricultural Effects of Climatic Change , 1999 .

[5]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Temperature and Crop Development , 1991 .

[6]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Modeling Plant and Soil Systems , 1991 .

[7]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[8]  The Impact of Global Warming on U.S. Agriculture: An Econometric Analysis of Optimal Growing Conditions , 2006 .

[9]  J. Black,et al.  Some Evidence on Weather-Crop-Yield Interaction , 1978 .

[10]  W. Michael Hanemann,et al.  Will U.S. Agriculture Really Benefit from Global Warming? Accounting for Irrigation in the Hedonic Approach , 2004 .

[11]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[12]  Timothy G. Conley GMM estimation with cross sectional dependence , 1999 .

[13]  B. McCarl,et al.  A reassessment of the economic effects of global climate change on U.S. agriculture , 1995 .

[14]  J. R. Kiniry,et al.  CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development , 1986 .

[15]  H. C. S. Thom,et al.  NORMAL DEGREE DAYS ABOVE ANY BASE BY THE UNIVERSAL TRUNCATION COEFFICIENT , 1966 .

[16]  W. Nordhaus,et al.  The Impact of Global Warming on Agriculture: A Ricardian Analysis: Reply , 1999 .

[17]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[18]  S. Long,et al.  Global food insecurity. Treatment of major food crops with elevated carbon dioxide or ozone under large-scale fully open-air conditions suggests recent models may have overestimated future yields , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.