Deterministic Quantum Phase Estimation beyond N00N States.

The modern scientific method is critically dependent on precision measurements of physical parameters. A classic example is the measurement of the optical phase enabled by optical interferometry, where the error on the measured phase is conventionally bounded by the so-called Heisenberg limit. To achieve phase estimation at the Heisenberg limit, it has been common to consider protocols based on highly complex N00N states of light. However, despite decades of research and several experimental explorations, there has been no demonstration of deterministic phase estimation with N00N states reaching the Heisenberg limit or even surpassing the shot noise limit. Here we use a deterministic phase estimation scheme based on a source of Gaussian squeezed vacuum states and high-efficiency homodyne detection to obtain phase estimates with an extreme sensitivity that significantly surpasses the shot noise limit and even beats the conventional Heisenberg limit as well as the performance of a pure N00N state protocol. Using a high-efficiency setup with a total loss of about 11%, we achieve a Fisher information of 15.8(6)  rad^{-2} per photon-a significant increase in performance compared to state of the art and beyond an ideal six photon N00N state scheme. This work represents an important achievement in quantum metrology, and it opens the door to future quantum sensing technologies for the interrogation of light-sensitive biological systems.

[1]  E. Knill,et al.  Scalable multiphoton quantum metrology with neither pre- nor post-selected measurements , 2020, Applied Physics Reviews.

[2]  M. Zucco,et al.  Twin beam quantum-enhanced correlated interferometry for testing fundamental physics , 2020, Communications Physics.

[3]  N. Spagnolo,et al.  Photonic quantum metrology , 2020, AVS Quantum Science.

[4]  R. Pooser,et al.  Quantum Sensing with Squeezed Light , 2019, ACS Photonics.

[5]  M. Zucco,et al.  Twin beam quantum-enhanced correlated interferometry for testing fundamental physics , 2018, Communications Physics.

[6]  U. Andersen,et al.  Super sensitivity and super resolution with quantum teleportation , 2018, 1805.05154.

[7]  Geoff J Pryde,et al.  Experimental optical phase measurement approaching the exact Heisenberg limit , 2017, Nature Communications.

[8]  V. Verma,et al.  Unconditional violation of the shot-noise limit in photonic quantum metrology , 2017, 1707.08977.

[9]  Chao Chen,et al.  Experimental Ten-Photon Entanglement. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[10]  S. van de Linde,et al.  Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Tobias Gehring,et al.  Ab initio quantum-enhanced optical phase estimation using real-time feedback control , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[12]  Richard Cole,et al.  Live-cell imaging , 2014, Cell adhesion & migration.

[13]  Warwick P. Bowen,et al.  Quantum metrology and its application in biology , 2014, 1409.0950.

[14]  J. Kołodyński,et al.  Quantum limits in optical interferometry , 2014, 1405.7703.

[15]  The Ligo Scientific Collaboration.  Enhancing the sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light , 2013, 1310.0383.

[16]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[17]  N. Godbout,et al.  Entanglement-enhanced probing of a delicate material system , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[18]  'Angel Rivas,et al.  Sub-Heisenberg estimation of non-random phase shifts , 2011, 1105.6310.

[19]  C. Fabre,et al.  Ultimate sensitivity of precision measurements with Gaussian quantum light : a multi-modal approach , 2011, 1105.2644.

[20]  S. Lloyd,et al.  Advances in quantum metrology , 2011, 1102.2318.

[21]  Aravind Chiruvelli,et al.  Quantum metrology with two-mode squeezed vacuum: parity detection beats the Heisenberg limit. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[22]  Yann R Chemla,et al.  Characterization of photoactivated singlet oxygen damage in single-molecule optical trap experiments. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[23]  E. Bagan,et al.  Phase estimation for thermal Gaussian states , 2008, 0811.3408.

[24]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a hyper-entangled ten-qubit Schr\ , 2008, 0809.4277.

[25]  H. M. Wiseman,et al.  Demonstrating Heisenberg-limited unambiguous phase estimation without adaptive measurements , 2008, 0809.3308.

[26]  J. Dowling.  Quantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states , 2008, 0904.0163.

[27]  D. Berry,et al.  Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation , 2007, Nature.

[28]  Keiji Sasaki,et al.  Beating the Standard Quantum Limit with Four-Entangled Photons , 2007, Science.

[29]  A. Monras.  Optimal phase measurements with pure Gaussian states , 2005, quant-ph/0509018.

[30]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state , 2003, Nature.

[31]  Aephraim M. Steinberg,et al.  Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state , 2003, Nature.

[32]  D. McClelland,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a squeezing-enhanced power-recycled michelson interferometer for gravitational wave detection. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[33]  S. Braunstein,et al.  Statistical distance and the geometry of quantum states. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[34]  B. Yurke,et al.  Squeezed-light-enhanced polarization interferometer. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[35]  C. Caves.  Quantum Mechanical Noise in an Interferometer , 1981 .

[36]  H. Yuen.  Quantum detection and estimation theory , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.